Keith Van Horn to the Bucks for Tim Thomas and
Michael Doleac to the Hawks for Nazr Mohammed

I with you plawrence, I couldn't figure it out either why they would trade Keith Van Horn for Tim Thomas? Van Horn was doing better than I thought he would be doing & then they up and trade him for Tim Thomas. It doesn't make much sense, but I heard the guys last night talking about how Thomas likes to run the floor & that will go well with Marbury. I wonder if they got rid of Van Horn just for Marbury?

As you know, their history together as members of the Nets wasn't good.

I don't know how many Knick games you get to watch in Texas, but naturally I see quite a few. They seemed to be playing well together, and that fact has been commented on extensively by the local broadcasters and writers, so it's not just my relatively uninformed opinion.

Maybe I'm a little biased in favor of Van Horn because he's an ex-Net, and because it was in his rookie year that he led the Nets to the playoffs for the first time in ages, but IMO he's not as bad a player as a lot of people think.

Still, four teams in 2 1/2 seasons....

At first I didn't like the trade, but now I'm 50/50. Thomas and Van Horn have had their run-ins with coaches and teammates in the past and both have not panned out from their lottery pick status. Fans here in Milwaukee were sick and tired of waiting for T2 to prove that he was worth that huge contract. He said he was gonna be a leader this year, but when your 5'10" point guard is having bigger rebound games than your supposed "franchise" player at 6'10", there's a problem. Maybe it will be a good trade, we'll see.

That must suck for Van Horn...He's been on NJ, Philadelphia, New York, and now Milwaukee? IN little over a year?

I think it's official to say that the Hawks want to suck and have much cap room.

Of course, they got rid of Shareef

And Sheed is an unrestricted FA at the end of the season too. -Pat

is a fact that the Hawks want to suck, but nobody cares about them..

about the trade, I think the Knicks did a great job getting rid of Van Horn and getting a good player in exchange for him. maybe I'm a little suspicious to talk about this, 'cause I hate him, but I really think it was a great deal for the Knickerbockers

I still dont' know if it was a great deal or not. Van Horn was good for the Knicks & did better than I thought he would be. I don't know about Tim Thomas yet until he proves himself.

Man, Rasheed Wallace is going to Detroit and I was hoping he'd go to New York. Man that sucks!

Im not a van horn fan at all and after they got marbury i knew he would get traded- and i wanted them to. But this trade obviously isnt working. Isiah traded him just to trade him and it ruined der season. Van Horns a pussy but at least he can play. TThomas is athletic as hell which they wanted but he just cant play. If they couldnt get a good trade for van horn they should have just kept him- specially since they were playin real good at the time. There still my team but IKE needs to do some more work in the offseason to make a run in the east

And just think if shithead Layden didnt trade Spree for Van Horn. Theyd be NICE right now.

1 more thing : whens houston commin back

I think Houston already came back last week.