1 registered members (Malavita),
92
guests, and 33
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics43,347
Posts1,086,182
Members10,381
|
Most Online1,254 Mar 13th, 2025
|
|
|
Re: Current Outfit Structure/ANP article
[Re: funkster]
#823174
01/10/15 05:45 PM
01/10/15 05:45 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 691
GaryMartin
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 691
|
You just came across it now? Been up for awhile. When I first started reading about the Outfit I visited ANP quite often. I found the comments section interesting and also informative. But some of those guys started arguing, ranting, raving, etc., and were banned. Plus some of the statements were not consistent with historical facts, etc. I just slowly moved away. Ocasionally I go back and read the comments section. But I found this site and you guys provide more info. Also, the moderators don't allow a lot of "flaming."
|
|
|
Re: Current Outfit Structure/ANP article
[Re: jonnynonos]
#823178
01/10/15 05:58 PM
01/10/15 05:58 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 840
funkster
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 840
|
As I mentioned I rarely visit the site anymore and I imagine a lot of other people don't either.
Ain't trying to be a dick...I was legit asking. Definitely an interesting article.
|
|
|
Re: Current Outfit Structure/ANP article
[Re: GaryMartin]
#823183
01/10/15 06:04 PM
01/10/15 06:04 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,094
Moe_Tilden
ForeverBotheringIranians
|
ForeverBotheringIranians

Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,094
|
You just came across it now? Been up for awhile. When I first started reading about the Outfit I visited ANP quite often. I found the comments section interesting and also informative. But some of those guys started arguing, ranting, raving, etc., and were banned. Plus some of the statements were not consistent with historical facts, etc. I just slowly moved away. Ocasionally I go back and read the comments section. But I found this site and you guys provide more info. Also, the moderators don't allow a lot of " flaming." Depends what you mean by flaming. Do you mean the insulting each other back and forth kind of flaming or do you mean the overtly homosexual kind of flaming? Because this is forum is FABULOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I invoke my right under the 5th amendment of the United States constitution and decline to answer the question.
|
|
|
Re: Current Outfit Structure/ANP article
[Re: Moe_Tilden]
#823203
01/10/15 07:20 PM
01/10/15 07:20 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 691
GaryMartin
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 691
|
You just came across it now? Been up for awhile. When I first started reading about the Outfit I visited ANP quite often. I found the comments section interesting and also informative. But some of those guys started arguing, ranting, raving, etc., and were banned. Plus some of the statements were not consistent with historical facts, etc. I just slowly moved away. Ocasionally I go back and read the comments section. But I found this site and you guys provide more info. Also, the moderators don't allow a lot of " flaming." Depends what you mean by flaming. Do you mean the insulting each other back and forth kind of flaming or do you mean the overtly homosexual kind of flaming? Because this is forum is FABULOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!! The insults and name-calling, etc. Yes, I enjoy this forum.
|
|
|
Re: Current Outfit Structure/ANP article
[Re: SinatraClub]
#823324
01/11/15 11:20 AM
01/11/15 11:20 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,156
jonnynonos
OP
Underboss
|
OP
Underboss
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,156
|
What's he talking about, about DiFronzo selling out the Outfit to remain unindicted in the Family Secrets trial? He has long advanced the theory that DiFronzo was a snitch, and, yeah, it started when he didn't get indicted in FS. Other people have wondered as well. The problem of course is that Fosco has an ace to grind. Anyway, I think the more realistic scenario is that they just didn't have enough to charge DiFronzo with. That was the official line. If memory serves Calabrese said DiFronzo was at the Spilotro murder, but, apparently, they didn't have any corroborating evidence. This became a little controversial because people said that other people were convicted on Calabrese's word alone, but that wasn't really true, they had at least some kind if evidence on everyone else. Anyway that is what I remember; it was a long time ago.
|
|
|
|