0 registered members (),
404
guests, and 11
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics43,344
Posts1,086,156
Members10,381
|
Most Online1,254 Mar 13th, 2025
|
|
|
Re: How realistic was the Corleone family?
#4293
09/27/03 12:54 PM
09/27/03 12:54 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 783 Iowa
Don Mataya
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 783
Iowa
|
I always wondered why the Corleones only had 2 capos, in probably one of the most powerful crime famlies in the country. The only thing I can think of is that Puzo wrote the book in 1969 and back then they did not have as much info on the mafia as they do today.
I buy you out. You don't buy me out.
|
|
|
Re: How realistic was the Corleone family?
#4296
09/29/03 02:50 AM
09/29/03 02:50 AM
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 47
Hagit
Wiseguy
|
Wiseguy
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 47
|
There are certainly some very real people in all of the GFs. I guess the corleons themselfs are a lot of people whom Puzo couldn't ID to easily plus the GODFATHER is a work of fiction after all!  I would not like it to be no other way.  However let see what little me could get: I was told that Johnny Fortain was Frank Sinara Moe Green is Bagsi Segal Hyman Roth is Meir Lenski The Corleons business in Havana were probebly true...
(I'd whish...!!)
|
|
|
Re: How realistic was the Corleone family?
#4297
09/29/03 05:47 PM
09/29/03 05:47 PM
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 775 No where
Boss_of_bosses
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 775
No where
|
Originally posted by Turnbull: I saw that A&E show on the Gambinos. "Crew" is not synonymous with "regime." Gambino had two capos--Paul Castellano, in charge of "white collar" operatons; and Aniello "Mr. Neil" Dellacroce, who headed "blue collar" work. Each had multiple crews under him. The show often referred to Gotti, on his way up, as a crew chief under Dellacroce. Each of the Corleone capos could have had many crews under him. Tessio had enough men to have 50 of them guard the mall after the Don died. Turnbull? they were Underbosses. Both Paul and Neil. Weren't they? I mean that's what I read. and Crew Ciefs are the same thing as Caporegimes (Or Captains)
|
|
|
Re: How realistic was the Corleone family?
#4298
09/29/03 08:13 PM
09/29/03 08:13 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 63 Miami, FL
babysinister
Button
|
Button
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 63
Miami, FL
|
Crews are small working groups that work on specific jobs. A caporegime heads a regime that contains soldiers, who may be called upon to do different jobs at any given time. They form themselves into crews to carry out those jobs. Some jobs are carried out at the behest of their caporegime, or with his blessing. Crew heads can pull jobs on their own, as long as they stay within the pre-arranged groundrules, one of which is to pay a tribute to the caporegime out of the proceeds of any independent endeavor.
Remember that in GF One, Sonny tells Tom Hagen that the family has 100 buttonmen on the streets 24-7, so if Solozzo shows even a hair in his ass he gets whacked. What happened was that the caporegimes pooled all their crews together for the war against the Tattaglias and Solozzo, under Sonny's orders.
Sanitashun? Ah tole joo to tell dem joo was in a sanatorium. Not sanitashun.
|
|
|
Re: How realistic was the Corleone family?
#4301
10/19/03 12:30 PM
10/19/03 12:30 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 13 New York
Kevin Rooney
Wiseguy
|
Wiseguy
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 13
New York
|
Aniello (Mr. Neil) Dellacroce was THE Underboss (there is only one). Big Paul Castellano was a capo whose juice derived mainly from being cousin and brother-in-law to Don Carlo Gambino. Carlo named Paul as his successor on his deathbed, passing over Dellacroce. Although Mr. Neil was such a traditionalist that he accepted the Don's decision, it created a resentment which caused a rift in the family, and led ultimately to Paul's assassination. Dellacroce remained Paul's Underboss until he predeceased Paul. Castellano's failure to show up at Neil's wake hastened his demise, a short time later.
"Keep your friends close, your enemies-closer" - Michael Corleone, quoting Don Vito. "You're a smart lawyer, very smart-but don't get smart with me!" -Rocky Sullivan (Cagney) to Frazier (Bogart) in Angels with Dirty Faces
|
|
|
Re: How realistic was the Corleone family?
#4304
10/20/03 06:01 PM
10/20/03 06:01 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 379 Southeast USA
Don Vanchenzo
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 379
Southeast USA
|
Let's see: A crew is the first "gang" you join. You do jobs, you make your bones. If your good and pure Italian, the Family may open their books put you up for your button. A button is/was a made member of the family. In the 1940's, it was easier to be made than in recent years (more suspcion now for obvious reasons). Made members were the soldiers. Remember when Sonny told Tom that 100 button men were on the streets 24/7 looking for Sollozzo. If you're a good soldier, you get promoted just like in the military. Eventually, hard work, dedication, earning potential and a lot of blood could earn you your own regime, making you a lieutenant or Capo. A Capo ran his own regime of buttons and crews. They reported to the underboss and/or consigliere. Often times, the head capo got the title underboss, if for no other reason by default only. Don's paid more attention to their consigliere than their underboss (Fredo vs. Tom to Mike) So, boys and girls, that's my Schoolhouse Rock version of "I'm just a bill", cosa nostra style. 
"The Godfather was a man to whom everybody came for help and never were they disappointed. He made no empty promises, nor the craven excuse that his hands were tied by more powerful forces in the world than himself. It was not necessary that he be your friend, it was not even important that you had no means with which to repay him. Only one thing was required. That you, yourself, proclaim your friendship. And then, no matter how poor or powerless the supplicant, the Godfather would take that person's troubles to his heart. He would let nothing stand in the way to a solution of that person's woe. His reward? Friendship, the respectful title 'Don' and sometimes the more affectionate salutation of 'Godfather.' Perhaps, to show respect only, never for profit, some humble gift - a gallon or homemade wine or a basket of fresh baked goods on a holiday. It was understood to proclaim that you were in his debt and that he had the right to call upon you at any time to redeem the debt by some small service." -- Mario Puzo, The Godfather (1969).
|
|
|
Re: How realistic was the Corleone family?
#4305
10/22/03 08:14 PM
10/22/03 08:14 PM
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 775 No where
Boss_of_bosses
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 775
No where
|
Originally posted by Don V: Carlo Gambino had 1 Underboss >> Dellacroce. Castellano was a capo. Dellacroce was passed over to become the next don when Gambino passed. Castellano went from capo to Don.
NO!! Carlo had 2. Every info I read simply stated that Neil ran half the faction while Paul ran the other. Carlo had TWO!!!
|
|
|
Re: How realistic was the Corleone family?
#4306
10/23/03 09:52 AM
10/23/03 09:52 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 13 New York
Kevin Rooney
Wiseguy
|
Wiseguy
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 13
New York
|
I'm afraid I must disagree with you, B.O.B. Castellano was NOT an Underboss. There is a lot of truth in what you say about Paul and Mr. Neil running different areas of the business, but they practically split into factions when Paul was named as Boss, skipping over Dellacroce, not before. Many people loyal to Neil, especially John Gotti, were highly upset that he didn't succeed Don Carlo, as he was rightfully in line to do so, as THE Underboss. This created a fault line under the foundations of the Gambino family. Neil magnanimously accepted Don Carlo's decision, however resentments in his faction built against Paul. Paul's greed, his hypocrisy and his self-imposed isolation from the rank-and-file added fuel to this fire. He was so ill-loved that only a few capos cared when he was assassinated.
"Keep your friends close, your enemies-closer" - Michael Corleone, quoting Don Vito. "You're a smart lawyer, very smart-but don't get smart with me!" -Rocky Sullivan (Cagney) to Frazier (Bogart) in Angels with Dirty Faces
|
|
|
Re: How realistic was the Corleone family?
#4307
10/23/03 04:26 PM
10/23/03 04:26 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902 New York
SC
Consigliere
|
Consigliere

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902
New York
|
Originally posted by Boss_of_bosses: Carlo had 2. Every info I read simply stated that Neil ran half the faction while Paul ran the other. Carlo had TWO!!! You may be mistaking Gambino's decision (upon his death) to allow Dellacroce to oversee the Family's lucrative Manhattan operations while Castellano had rule over the rest. Gambino wanted the Family to become more legitimate, and knowing that Castellano had a better head for this type of business he appointed Paul as the boss to replace him. Don Carlo also knew there'd be some factions in the Family that wouldn't be happy with this decision, so he "gave" the Manhattan operations to Dellacroce in an effort to placate Neil. It depends on which source of information you follow on who was the Gambino Family underboss. Its generally accepted that when Carlo had taken over (after Albert Anastasia was killed in 1957) the underboss was Joseph Biondo. In the mid 60's Biondo did something pretty foolish - he tried to cheat Gambino on some deals - and Biondo was forced to step down as underboss. Carlo then elevated Dellacroce to be his new underboss. Its been sometimes noted that Dellacroce was Anastasia's underboss, and if in fact he was, it was only for a very short time. (That title had been held by Frank Scalise, who was killed a few months before Anastasia). I have a copy of the Gambino Family chart that the government used in the early 60's (much of the info supplied by Joe Valachi). Both Aniello Dellacroce and Paul Castellano are listed as "Capo". I've never seen any chart which listed Paul as "Underboss".
.
|
|
|
Re: How realistic was the Corleone family?
#4311
11/01/03 07:53 PM
11/01/03 07:53 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,696 AZ
Turnbull
|

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,696
AZ
|
Carlo Gambino was a very clever man: As you probably know, Vito Genovese arranged with Gambino to assassinate Albert (the Mad Hatter) Anastasia, and to have Gambino take over as Don. In return, Gambino would be loyal to Genovese and support his move to legitimize drug traffic (the purpose of the famous 1957 Apalachin meeting was to legitimize Gambino, anoint Genovese as capo di tutti capi, and to ok drug trafficking). But Neil Dellacroce, who was loyal to Anasasia, vowed to avenge him. So Gambino sat him down and made him an offer he couldn't refuse: Neil would be underboss, and have near-autonomy over the family's "traditional" rackets (loan sharking, hijacking, gambling, etc.). Meanwhile, Gambino was encouraging his cousin and brother in law, Paul Castellano, to develop the family's "white collar" rackets (labor and construction racketeering, legitimate businesses such as wholesale meat and poultry, etc.). Castellano never held a big, official title because Gambino didn't want him to attract law enforcement attention that might have diverted his attempts to develop the "legit" side. But everyone in the family (and the hierarchy of other families) knew that Castellano was at least as high up in Gambino's estimation as Dellacroce. As it happened, Gambino was on his deathbed while Dellacroce was in jail, finishing a term for tax evasion. The family needed at least an acting boss, and Castellano was it. Castellano's official anointment as head of the family waited a few weeks until Dellacroce got out of prison. He then had a famous sit-down with Dellacroce and promised him the same deal he'd had with Gambino: autonomy over the "blue collar" rackets. Dellacroce accepted. As you can see, Gambino was lucky as well as clever. The Apalachin meeting was busted up before they were able to name Genovese capo di tutti capi and approve drug trafficking, but they did have time to anoint Gambino. Then Geneovese went away for 15 years on a drug rap, leaving the field clear for Gambino to be the top dog in NYC. And the fact that Gambino had to anoint his own successor while Dellacroce was in prison, worked to his advantage: had Dellacroce been free at the time, he might have fought Castellano for the position no matter what Don Carlo wanted. By the time he got out, Castellano was acting Don and had the blessing of the other families' Dons.
Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu, E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu... E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
|
|
|
|