2 registered members (VitoCahill, 1 invisible),
175
guests, and 22
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics42,986
Posts1,074,853
Members10,349
|
Most Online1,100 Jun 10th, 2024
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: The Last Woltz]
#1022516
10/28/21 01:37 AM
10/28/21 01:37 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 449
Capri
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 449
|
Plus, the assassin's role is pretty much a suicide assignment.
How you figure because dead men tell no tales They still wouldn't know who hired them
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Kangaroo Don]
#1022517
10/28/21 01:41 AM
10/28/21 01:41 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 449
Capri
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 449
|
Michael: He [Roth] acts like I'm his son -- his successor Ahhh! that little farce Roth played, fooled a Corleone [ until Michael survived the Tahoe shooting] Michael still didn't see through Roth even after Roth in Miami was backing up the Rosato brothers in New York against Pentangeli the Corleone caporegime Pentangeli did and warned him
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Kangaroo Don]
#1022518
10/28/21 01:43 AM
10/28/21 01:43 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 449
Capri
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 449
|
How would he [Roth] know Rocco would say looks like they were hired out of New York unless that was their plan Then was Rocco the second traitor and the one who killed the two assassins? Actually who delivered the "New York connection." lines? according to the transcript it was not Rocco, it was a buttonman Looks like they were hired out of New York, I don't recognize them We won't get anything out of them now Another one that makes no sense “I don't recognize them” because whoever said the lines, would know! every contract killer other than “hired out of New York”?! Was it relief "We won't get anything out of them now" that the dead assassins can't implicate anyone Glad it was not Rocco
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Trojan]
#1022555
10/28/21 11:30 PM
10/28/21 11:30 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
There's a big difference between asking someone to provide information, or maybe even open drapes, and asking someone to kill their Don.
First of all, there's a totally different skill set involved. Fredo was apparently very useful to Roth as an informant. But would you trust him to carry out a hit?
Plus, the assassin's role is pretty much a suicide assignment. If no assassins were found on the compound, it would point to a very small group of suspects (even if the killer was not caught in the act, was able to hide the gun, get back to their room, etc.). Any chance of advancement in the new Corleone Family would be ruined even if they survived. Why would they agree to do that for Roth? Good points Woltz makes perfect sense Same as Paulie and Tessio setting up but not actually pulling the trigger If Michael had died, would there be any Corleone Family? I reckon in the ensuing chaos the likely scenarios are with noone knowing Fredo's involvement Tom probably would have taken off unless he felt responsible for Fredo and stayed around for awhile to help him out Futile though Fredo might try to claim the Family as the only blood male left but can't see it happening The most likely outcome as I see is, Neri and Rocco fighting each other for control and Roth sitting pretty to pick up the Corleone business after all the bloodshed There is also this implausible sequence of events even superman couldn't have pulled it off! Besides wasn't enough time? after the machine gun fire when everything was galvanized into immediate action – sirens, spot lights, guards, dogs and everyone was running around all over the Tahoe compound – without being seen, among others - to kill the two machine guns armed assassins
- to drag their bodies into the ditch, where they were found
- to hide their machine guns
Coppola and Puzo too much anisette! Sure thing “There's a big difference” in “setting up but not actually pulling the trigger” However the fact remains there was a traitor in the family who was complicit in the murder attempt on Michael – it still “would point to a very small group of suspects” one or more, who set their Don up to be murdered “If no assassins were found on the compound” I believe it would have worked even more in Roth's favour because of the unease of mistrust that one of their own was not just complicit but actually killed Michael and everyone watching their backs, contributing to “the ensuing chaos” and "bloodshed" It also would eliminate the Huge and unnecessary risk, smuggling in and then hiding the two assassins who would have had to wait around until Michael entered the bedroom
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Trojan]
#1022556
10/28/21 11:30 PM
10/28/21 11:30 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
I started a thread about Roth's plan and how stupid/unnecessary it was. All he had to do was bide his time for a couple of weeks, have Michael killed in Cuba, use his connections to the Bautista regime to blame it on Castro and his rebels and he wins. Maybe, but I think it was more like a few months. That's a long time to wait. A lot could have happened in that time, such as Michael figuring out that Roth is his enemy (actually, I think Michael already knew, but didn't expect such an aggressive move from Roth), Michael making further inroads in Roth's Nevada holdings, Fredo slipping up and revealing something, etc. If there was no Tahoe shooting and Michael was to be killed in Havana, there would have been no need to recruit Fredo or backing up the Rosatos I am not sure Michael was figuring out that Roth He acts like I'm his son -- his successor is his enemy until after the Tahoe shooting I reckon that's where Roth was slippin' Michael would have turned up completely relaxed and confident, in their friendship and be a sitting duck However it still could have certainly raised significant suspicions that Michael was the only one who died My take, for what it is worth! I doubt Michael was “figuring out that Roth is his enemy” Michael seemed to have been completely taken in! by Roth even after the Tahoe shooting Michael initially believed it was someone inside telling Tom They [Tahoe assassins] are dead already, killed by somebody close to us inside ie: It seems Roth was not even suspected Roth had Michael, pretty much in the palm of his hand! I believe where the incredibly resourceful and astute Roth erred in his meticulous preparation is his overthinking and the recurring, people overestimating themselves and underestimating their opponents instead of KISS!! thus showing his hand Also hiring assassins who couldn't shoot fish in a barrel! Michael was lapping up! everything Roth was spinning in his web of deceit until the Tahoe shooting We see how Michael was disgusted with himself that he hadn't seen through Roth's deceit when having drinks with Fredo in Havana Roth would have quietly taken back! whatever Nevada holdings Roth 'lost' to Michael and continued to live like our average neighbour, harmless old man, retired investor on a pension!
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Trojan]
#1022557
10/28/21 11:30 PM
10/28/21 11:30 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
Extracts: Whilst Michael's murder in Havana seemingly such a terribly unfortunate death, caught up in the midst of the rebel uprising in spite of being escorted in a military car, it still could have certainly raised significant suspicions that Michael was the only one who died
Roth has to answer for Michael You organise a massacre and have Michael as one of the many victims. Wrong place. Wrong time. A lot of hand wringing and shedding of crocodile tears still could have certainly raised significant suspicions that Michael was the only one from Roth party who died Why would he be the only one? Easy enough to sacrifice a couple more lesser members Don't know lucab19 how to get the lesser members to go in the ride with Michael? Sightseeing tour! Also no one least of all Roth was expecting the Castro takeover So hard to organise a massacre without the rebel uprising Michael was the only one who had the perception that the "Rebels can win" at the end of the day, it was a stroke of luck for both Michael and Roth as if Batista hadn't been forced to resign, I believe – - Michael would undoubtedly have been murdered by Roth's pre-arranged assassins, in the military car plan or somehow if Michael refused the protection offer
- Roth too would have died smothered by Michael's bodyguard Buscetta in his hospital room
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Kangaroo Don]
#1022586
10/29/21 03:20 PM
10/29/21 03:20 PM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 773 Pittsburgh, PA
The Last Woltz
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 773
Pittsburgh, PA
|
I started a thread about Roth's plan and how stupid/unnecessary it was. All he had to do was bide his time for a couple of weeks, have Michael killed in Cuba, use his connections to the Bautista regime to blame it on Castro and his rebels and he wins. Maybe, but I think it was more like a few months. That's a long time to wait. A lot could have happened in that time, such as Michael figuring out that Roth is his enemy (actually, I think Michael already knew, but didn't expect such an aggressive move from Roth), Michael making further inroads in Roth's Nevada holdings, Fredo slipping up and revealing something, etc. If there was no Tahoe shooting and Michael was to be killed in Havana, there would have been no need to recruit Fredo or backing up the Rosatos I am not sure Michael was figuring out that Roth He acts like I'm his son -- his successor is his enemy until after the Tahoe shooting I reckon that's where Roth was slippin' Michael would have turned up completely relaxed and confident, in their friendship and be a sitting duck However it still could have certainly raised significant suspicions that Michael was the only one who died My take, for what it is worth! I doubt Michael was “figuring out that Roth is his enemy” Michael seemed to have been completely taken in! by Roth even after the Tahoe shooting Michael initially believed it was someone inside telling Tom They [Tahoe assassins] are dead already, killed by somebody close to us inside ie: It seems Roth was not even suspected I'll concede that it's not clear that Michael already suspects Roth. But Michael tells Pentangeli that he knows Roth is backing the Rosatos. It's hard to imagine that it didn't strike ever-paranoid Michael as odd that Roth would insert himself in a turf war over three territories in the Bronx. Backing the Rosatos was not, to coin a phrase, the act of a friend. Michael's failure was not believing that Roth thought of him as a son, it was thinking that Roth wouldn't push back against Michael's aggressiveness, either because there was so much money at stake that Roth wouldn't want to jeopardize their deal or because Michael didn't really think Roth was someone who would resort to violence.
"A man in my position cannot afford to be made to look ridiculous!"
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: The Last Woltz]
#1022610
10/29/21 11:14 PM
10/29/21 11:14 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
These different, interesting and varied takes, are what keeps this, what a nice board! still going decade after decade indeed Fair points Woltz but the confusing discrepancies for me are - Roth already had the Havana business So Michael is the one who “wouldn't want to jeopardize their [Roth-Michael] deal” because there was so much money at stake for Michael not Roth which I believe Roth knew as well Hence Roth's play on Michael's greed Pentangeli always! knew never to trust Hyman Roth, Michael to never give his loyalty to Roth before his own blood indeed Whilst Michael may have looked sheepish that's exactly what Michael did! because he didn't want his important business with Hyman Roth disturbed ie: greed blinded him even if it did “strike the ever-paranoid Michael as odd Roth backing up the Rosato brothers It seems to me Michael's failure was “ believing that Roth thought of him as a son” but you are right, Michael was not expecting any “push back” from Roth because I believe, among others - - Roth has anointed Michael as his heir apparent! to Roth's Havana business And all it takes to cement this father-son alliance /succession, is an introduction to the Cuban President and a gift of $2 Million
- Roth will go along with Michael moving Klingman out – I doubt it even occurred to Michael as to why Roth and other partners would just let Michael take over their Hotel and be okay with it? [This is different to Greene's because the Corleones bankrolled that Hotel]
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Kangaroo Don]
#1022612
10/30/21 01:38 AM
10/30/21 01:38 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635 AZ
Turnbull
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635
AZ
|
A constant theme in the Trilogy (and the novel) is how greed (and thirst for revenge) blind otherwise intelligent men to obvious dangers to themselves. Michael's greed for Roth's Cuban gaming empire blinded him to the obvious: Why would Roth, who lived in Miami and had business interests in Havana and Nevada, interest himself in a petty quarrel between the Rosatos and Pentangeli over three territories in the Bronx? Didn't it occur to him that Roth might be plotting to put the Rosatos in charge of the "Olive Oil Business" in NYC--Michael's muscle?.
Roth's greed for the $2 million blinded him to the obvious: Why would Michael, whose last words to Roth in Miami were, "Frank Pentangeli is a dead man," then spare Frankie and send him on a mission to "settle these problems with the Rosato Brothers"? Didn't it occur to him that Michael was signaling that he didn't blame Frankie for the Tahoe attack--and might blame Roth instead?
Michael could have had Roth squashed like a bug in Miami. Roth could have had Michael squashed like a bug the moment he stepped off the plane in Havana. Neither did. The marvel of the "This is the business we've chosen" scene in Roth's hotel suite in Havana is that, by that time, each of them probably knew what the other was up to, yet they both hung tough to the bitter end: Michael wanting to learn who was the traitor in his family, Roth for the $2 million.
Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu, E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu... E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Turnbull]
#1022671
10/30/21 11:20 PM
10/30/21 11:20 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
My take, for what it is worth! I believe Roth was not a greedy man, for the Corleones' Nevada properties nor Michael's $2 million [Michael was all set to be murdered New Year's Eve with or without the $2 million] but of course if they fell into Roth's lap, Roth will take it Bonus! and added bonus Michael's own money paying for his own murder Michael's greed, nearly undone himself with Roth [not just people like Paulie, Fabrizio and Tessio] Roth only started plotting revenge on Michael when Roth felt Roth had to “gift” Michael their Hotel, then to stop Michael “making [any] further inroads in Roth's Nevada holdings” and eyeing Roth's Havana business In fairness to Michael, Roth was stringing Michael along among others “gifting” their Hotel and pretending “to go along” instead if Roth had been honest perhaps Michael and Roth could have worked out some mutually beneficial arrangement not dissimilar to Roth's Havana business Then both Michael and Roth could live happily for a hundred years! How'd Michael know it was Roth? I also believe Michael understood that whilst Michael was Roth's successor, the heir apparent, Roth was always going “to hold onto his Havana empire” until Roth's retirement or death and at the time, Michael would inherit Roth's interests in the Havana operation Anybody kinda rooting for Roth to beat Mike? On the other hand, Michael, who could have used violence or murder against Roth, didn't--he was negotiating for the Havana properties. Roth, on the other hand, set up the machine gun attack at Tahoe, and didn't care if Kay was killed in the attack. Moral of story: No honor among thieves
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Kangaroo Don]
#1029371
02/02/22 02:28 AM
02/02/22 02:28 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 449
Capri
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 449
|
Besides wasn't enough time? after the machine gun fire when everything was galvanized into immediate action – sirens, spot lights, guards, dogs and everyone was running around all over the Tahoe compound – without being seen, among others - to kill the two machine guns armed assassins
- to drag their bodies into the ditch, where they were found
- to hide their machine guns
Coppola and Puzo too much anisette! red herring assassins killed and bodies into the ditch before machine gun fire
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Trojan]
#1061419
06/09/23 11:09 PM
06/09/23 11:09 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
I hadn't noticed this before Ref: J Geoff Malta Transcript Fredo's boat pulls up to the dock. Fredo and Johnny Ola and others [Ola's men?] get off the boat and onto the dock Did Fredo and Ola come to the party together?! in the same boat? Roth's house in Miami - If Pentangeli was small potatoes how could Pentangeli have engineered the Tahoe bedroom shooting "In my bedroom! where my wife sleeps! In my home!" Roth's Havana Hotel room Roth: Earlier - My sixth sense tells me your brother Fredo brought a bag full of money Where is it? Later - That two million -- in a bag in your room
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Kangaroo Don]
#1061587
06/12/23 03:24 PM
06/12/23 03:24 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635 AZ
Turnbull
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635
AZ
|
I hadn't noticed this before Ref: J Geoff Malta Transcript Fredo's boat pulls up to the dock. Fredo and Johnny Ola and others [Ola's men?] get off the boat and onto the dock Did Fredo and Ola come to the party together?! in the same boat? The transcript is wrong. I just went over that scene, frame by frame. As the boat pulls in, Rocco rushes over to greet the occupants. Fredo isn't among them. The very next scene shows Pentangeli, drinking from a hose, then shouting greetings at Fredo, who's wearing a very distinctive plaid jacket.that we'd have noticed if he'd disembarked from that boat.
Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu, E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu... E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Turnbull]
#1061906
06/16/23 11:07 PM
06/16/23 11:07 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
I hadn't noticed this before Ref: J Geoff Malta Transcript Fredo's boat pulls up to the dock. Fredo and Johnny Ola and others [Ola's men?] get off the boat and onto the dock Did Fredo and Ola come to the party together?! in the same boat? The transcript is wrong. I just went over that scene, frame by frame. As the boat pulls in, Rocco rushes over to greet the occupants. Fredo isn't among them. The very next scene shows Pentangeli, drinking from a hose, then shouting greetings at Fredo, who's wearing a very distinctive plaid jacket.that we'd have noticed if he'd disembarked from that boat. Thanks Turnbull so that was no Fredo ferry service! Fredo was not sent to pick people up! for the party I was under the impression they come by car She was not happy Head of the family is kid brother not Fredo Thanks also Capri - the deleted scene Fredo and Deanna arrive at Anthony's partyDeanna humiliating Fredo in every turn - 1. why Fredo was scared of his kid brother 2. lingering handshake with Merle 3. not a real man insult and in front of all those people at his brother's - the Head of the family - house 4. and in front of all the family, guests, staff Deanna: You know something, those daigos are crazy when it comes to their wives. Never marry a WOP! they treat their wives like shit! Fredo shoulda married a woman like Michael did! -- like Kay
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Trojan]
#1062087
06/19/23 11:08 PM
06/19/23 11:08 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
Michael's questions to Tom in Vegas on Michael's return from Cuba - First - Kay know I'm back?
- Second – Christmas gift for his son Anthony Nothing! about his daughter Mary
Michael: The only wealth in this world is children, more than all the money and power on Earth You [Anthony not?! Mary] are my treasure - Third - Fredo
Michael : Where's my brother? Tom : Uh -- Roth got out on a private boat, he's in a hospital in Miami. Had a stroke but he recovered okay (then) Your Bodyguard's dead Michael : I asked about Fredo Tom : Uh -- I think he got out -- he must be somewhere in New York Michael: Alright -- I want you to get in touch with him -- I know he's scared -- tell him everything's all right Tell him I know Roth misled him -- and he didn't know they were planing to kill me You're still my brotherMichael still offered Fredo safe passage home from Havana even after having “just learned that Fredo had betrayed him, nearly resulting in his and Kay's being killed” What a brother! Such brotherly love because Fredo was still Michael's brother
|
|
|
|