2 registered members (Liggio, 1 invisible),
124
guests, and 28
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics42,987
Posts1,074,860
Members10,349
|
Most Online1,100 Jun 10th, 2024
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Trojan]
#1022273
10/24/21 12:01 AM
10/24/21 12:01 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
Sure thing Evita “Just the one assassin [ already in-house] not three No doubt less risky less complicated” Roth had indeed "overthought" the plan being fixated, in framing Pentangeli and ended up in a tangled web Huge and unnecessary risk, smuggling in and then hiding the two assassins who would have had to wait around until Michael entered the bedroom “when whoever killed them [the assassins] could have [easily] carried out the shooting himself Simpler” Besides wasn't enough time? after the machine gun fire when everything was galvanized into immediate action – sirens, spot lights, guards, dogs and everyone was running around all over the Tahoe compound – without being seen, among others - to kill the two machine guns armed assassins
- to drag their bodies into the ditch, where they were found
- to hide their machine guns
Coppola and Puzo too much anisette!
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Lou_Para]
#1022274
10/24/21 12:01 AM
10/24/21 12:01 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
If Kay hadn't mentioned the drapes being open,I have no doubt Mike would've died that day. It's kind of ironic that Kay saved Mike's life,only to have him ruin hers. Hallelujah! Who opened the drapes? has been solved! It was Kay Kay was waiting for Michael to be blasted by machine gun fire and when that didn't happen, Kay asked Michael “Why are the drapes open?” hoping Michael would move closer to the window, to close the drapes so that the assassins could get a better shot at Michael - Let’s be honest Kay ruined Michael's life and became his horror
Kay knew when she married Michael, Michael was Mafia and Kay was quite knowledgeable too Kay: Senators and presidents don't have men killed...
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Trojan]
#1022280
10/24/21 02:38 AM
10/24/21 02:38 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 449
Capri
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 449
|
Roth's interest to keep the finger pointing at Pentangeli spectacularly failed As we debated in Did Roth sort of win? thread: True Woltz let's not overstate the impact he had on Michael and luck had little or nothing to do with it
Michael was expected to be dead, machine gunned in his bedroom I reckon noone would have suspected Roth and his "New York connection." wouldn't have mattered but he overthought it which ended up pointing the finger at him, when Michael survived
How would he know Rocco would say looks like they were hired out of New York unless that was their plan Then was Rocco the second traitor and the one who killed the two assassins?
Then why couldn't Rocco carry out the shooting himself? Just the one assassin not three No doubt less risky less complicated We always knew Michael were too smart to let Roth beat him So we now say Rocco was the second traitor and the one who killed the two assassins?
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Capri]
#1022290
10/24/21 06:04 AM
10/24/21 06:04 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,087
JCrusher
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,087
|
Roth's interest to keep the finger pointing at Pentangeli spectacularly failed As we debated in Did Roth sort of win? thread: True Woltz let's not overstate the impact he had on Michael and luck had little or nothing to do with it
Michael was expected to be dead, machine gunned in his bedroom I reckon noone would have suspected Roth and his "New York connection." wouldn't have mattered but he overthought it which ended up pointing the finger at him, when Michael survived
How would he know Rocco would say looks like they were hired out of New York unless that was their plan Then was Rocco the second traitor and the one who killed the two assassins?
Then why couldn't Rocco carry out the shooting himself? Just the one assassin not three No doubt less risky less complicated We always knew Michael were too smart to let Roth beat him So we now say Rocco was the second traitor and the one who killed the two assassins? . Yes Mike was very smart BUT like I mentioned earlier it was just pure dumb luck that he survived. No matter what you think of Roth that old man was extremely smart and cunning without having the type of muscle that Mike had
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Kangaroo Don]
#1022334
10/24/21 06:24 PM
10/24/21 06:24 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 813
Trojan
OP
Underboss
|
OP
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 813
|
Roth's overthought plan of too many assassins, botched a simple hit of machine gunning confined space of a bedroom If he had someone as implausible as it is - to kill the two machine guns armed assassins
- to drag their bodies into the ditch, where they were found
- to hide their machine guns
Why bother with the assassins in the first place “when whoever killed them [the assassins] could have [easily] carried out the shooting himself Simpler” Makes no sense whatsoever
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Capri]
#1022336
10/24/21 06:28 PM
10/24/21 06:28 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 813
Trojan
OP
Underboss
|
OP
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 813
|
Kay biggest hypocrite broke his heart also abortion She told him Anthony knows that you killed Fredo He know she killed his unborn brother Michael and Kay, sentiments aside.... Michael had already told Kay, very clearly, he won't let her take the children from him that it is an impossibility Even after that she tells him about the 'abortion' the murder of their unborn child as if What about the already born son who was left to be around that life, she, the mother was escaping from I bet she didn't tell Anthony about his brother she killed Biggest hypocrite no doubt
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Capri]
#1022337
10/24/21 06:31 PM
10/24/21 06:31 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 813
Trojan
OP
Underboss
|
OP
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 813
|
We always knew Michael were too smart to let Roth beat him
So we now say Rocco was the second traitor and the one who killed the two assassins? No doubt Roth was not as smart and cunning as Michael Also overthought, missed his chance and became the hunted one 1. Rocco or whoever the second traitor who killed the bedroom shooters 2. why there had to be these shooters in the first place Too hard basket! No one has the answer
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Trojan]
#1022345
10/24/21 07:18 PM
10/24/21 07:18 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 89 Adelaide, Australia
lucab19
Button
|
Button
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 89
Adelaide, Australia
|
We always knew Michael were too smart to let Roth beat him
So we now say Rocco was the second traitor and the one who killed the two assassins? No doubt Roth was not as smart and cunning as Michael Also overthought, missed his chance and became the hunted one 1. Rocco or whoever the second traitor who killed the bedroom shooters 2. why there had to be these shooters in the first place Too hard basket! No one has the answer I started a thread about Roth's plan and how stupid/unnecessary it was. All he had to do was bide his time for a couple of weeks, have Michael killed in Cuba, use his connections to the Bautista regime to blame it on Castro and his rebels and he wins. Instead ...
Last edited by lucab19; 10/24/21 07:21 PM. Reason: incomplete
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: lucab19]
#1022361
10/25/21 04:32 AM
10/25/21 04:32 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 449
Capri
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 449
|
We always knew Michael were too smart to let Roth beat him No doubt Roth was not as smart and cunning as Michael Also overthought, missed his chance and became the hunted one I started a thread about Roth's plan and how stupid/unnecessary it was. All he had to do was bide his time for a couple of weeks, have Michael killed in Cuba, use his connections to the Bautista regime to blame it on Castro and his rebels and he wins. Instead ... It's a smart move Roth was always smarter planned attempt good on paper but he overthought it Every plan fizzled out, ended up in a tangled web Sure caused some grief to Michael but Fail Let’s be honest if not for Military Roth was an inch away from being killed pretty brilliant pretty smart yet dead Roth Tahoe shooting Fail two million Fail Havana killing Fail turning Frankie Fail perjury Fail Jew in Israel Fail Buenos Aries Fail Panama Fail retired investor on a pension Fail US return Fail
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Trojan]
#1022418
10/25/21 11:35 PM
10/25/21 11:35 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
Tahoe shooting was a brilliant plan but executed poorly Too many variables Huge and unnecessary risks just for the "New York connection." How'd Michael know it was Roth?Roth undoubtedly wanted Michael dead soonest but blinded by revenge, Roth outsmarted himself with the Tahoe shooting plan and messed up big time! If Michael had died?As Turnbull posted All Roth would have to do would be to sit back and let them fight each other Then pick up all the Corleone business after all the bloodshed If Michael had survived without the obvious blind Freddie "New York connection." set up, considering - Roth played this one beautifully Roth had Michael completely relaxed and confident, in their friendship - Michael may not have figured, Michael: It was Hyman Roth that tried to have me killed I know it was him And nobody, figures out it was Roth all along - Also Evita's original question
why there had to be these assassins in the first place “when whoever killed them [the assassins] could have [easily] carried out the shooting himself Simpler” No doubt less risky less complicated Makes no sense whatsoever Again, Roth's fixation in framing Pentangeli was doomed for failure
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: lucab19]
#1022419
10/25/21 11:35 PM
10/25/21 11:35 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
I started a thread about Roth's plan and how stupid/unnecessary it was. All he had to do was bide his time for a couple of weeks, have Michael killed in Cuba, use his connections to the Bautista regime to blame it on Castro and his rebels and he wins. Instead ... from the thread lucab19 started Roth's plan. Really?Havana is great It's Roth's kinda town and Michael was Roth's invited guest
Whilst Michael's murder in Havana seemingly such a terribly unfortunate death, caught up in the midst of the rebel uprising in spite of being escorted in a military car, it still could have certainly raised significant suspicions that Michael was the only one who died
Roth has to answer for Michael I believe the Tahoe shooting would have been a sure-fire hit if, among others - Just the one assassin not three No doubt less risky less complicated
Roth's overthought plan of too many assassins, botched a simple hit of machine gunning confined space of a bedroom Again, Roth's fixation in framing Pentangeli was doomed for failure
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Trojan]
#1022447
10/26/21 11:13 PM
10/26/21 11:13 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
Michael: He [Roth] acts like I'm his son -- his successor Ahhh! that little farce Roth played, fooled a Corleone [ until Michael survived the Tahoe shooting] Michael still didn't see through Roth even after Roth in Miami was backing up the Rosato brothers in New York against Pentangeli the Corleone caporegime
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Trojan]
#1022449
10/26/21 11:13 PM
10/26/21 11:13 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
How would he [Roth] know Rocco would say looks like they were hired out of New York unless that was their plan Then was Rocco the second traitor and the one who killed the two assassins? Actually who delivered the "New York connection." lines? according to the transcript it was not Rocco, it was a buttonman Looks like they were hired out of New York, I don't recognize them We won't get anything out of them now Another one that makes no sense “I don't recognize them” because whoever said the lines, would know! every contract killer other than “hired out of New York”?! Was it relief "We won't get anything out of them now" that the dead assassins can't implicate anyone
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Trojan]
#1022478
10/27/21 02:18 PM
10/27/21 02:18 PM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 773 Pittsburgh, PA
The Last Woltz
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 773
Pittsburgh, PA
|
We always knew Michael were too smart to let Roth beat him
So we now say Rocco was the second traitor and the one who killed the two assassins? No doubt Roth was not as smart and cunning as Michael Also overthought, missed his chance and became the hunted one 1. Rocco or whoever the second traitor who killed the bedroom shooters 2. why there had to be these shooters in the first place Too hard basket! No one has the answer There's a big difference between asking someone to provide information, or maybe even open drapes, and asking someone to kill their Don. First of all, there's a totally different skill set involved. Fredo was apparently very useful to Roth as an informant. But would you trust him to carry out a hit? Plus, the assassin's role is pretty much a suicide assignment. If no assassins were found on the compound, it would point to a very small group of suspects (even if the killer was not caught in the act, was able to hide the gun, get back to their room, etc.). Any chance of advancement in the new Corleone Family would be ruined even if they survived. Why would they agree to do that for Roth? I started a thread about Roth's plan and how stupid/unnecessary it was. All he had to do was bide his time for a couple of weeks, have Michael killed in Cuba, use his connections to the Bautista regime to blame it on Castro and his rebels and he wins. Maybe, but I think it was more like a few months. That's a long time to wait. A lot could have happened in that time, such as Michael figuring out that Roth is his enemy (actually, I think Michael already knew, but didn't expect such an aggressive move from Roth), Michael making further inroads in Roth's Nevada holdings, Fredo slipping up and revealing something, etc.
Last edited by The Last Woltz; 10/27/21 02:19 PM.
"A man in my position cannot afford to be made to look ridiculous!"
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: The Last Woltz]
#1022491
10/27/21 07:11 PM
10/27/21 07:11 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 813
Trojan
OP
Underboss
|
OP
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 813
|
There's a big difference between asking someone to provide information, or maybe even open drapes, and asking someone to kill their Don.
First of all, there's a totally different skill set involved. Fredo was apparently very useful to Roth as an informant. But would you trust him to carry out a hit?
Plus, the assassin's role is pretty much a suicide assignment. If no assassins were found on the compound, it would point to a very small group of suspects (even if the killer was not caught in the act, was able to hide the gun, get back to their room, etc.). Any chance of advancement in the new Corleone Family would be ruined even if they survived. Why would they agree to do that for Roth? Good points Woltz makes perfect sense Same as Paulie and Tessio setting up but not actually pulling the trigger If Michael had died, would there be any Corleone Family? I reckon in the ensuing chaos the likely scenarios are with noone knowing Fredo's involvement Tom probably would have taken off unless he felt responsible for Fredo and stayed around for awhile to help him out Futile though Fredo might try to claim the Family as the only blood male left but can't see it happening The most likely outcome as I see is, Neri and Rocco fighting each other for control and Roth sitting pretty to pick up the Corleone business after all the bloodshed There is also this implausible sequence of events even superman couldn't have pulled it off! Besides wasn't enough time? after the machine gun fire when everything was galvanized into immediate action – sirens, spot lights, guards, dogs and everyone was running around all over the Tahoe compound – without being seen, among others - to kill the two machine guns armed assassins
- to drag their bodies into the ditch, where they were found
- to hide their machine guns
Coppola and Puzo too much anisette!
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: The Last Woltz]
#1022492
10/27/21 07:17 PM
10/27/21 07:17 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 813
Trojan
OP
Underboss
|
OP
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 813
|
I started a thread about Roth's plan and how stupid/unnecessary it was. All he had to do was bide his time for a couple of weeks, have Michael killed in Cuba, use his connections to the Bautista regime to blame it on Castro and his rebels and he wins. Maybe, but I think it was more like a few months. That's a long time to wait. A lot could have happened in that time, such as Michael figuring out that Roth is his enemy (actually, I think Michael already knew, but didn't expect such an aggressive move from Roth), Michael making further inroads in Roth's Nevada holdings, Fredo slipping up and revealing something, etc. If there was no Tahoe shooting and Michael was to be killed in Havana, there would have been no need to recruit Fredo or backing up the Rosatos I am not sure Michael was figuring out that Roth He acts like I'm his son -- his successor is his enemy until after the Tahoe shooting I reckon that's where Roth was slippin' Michael would have turned up completely relaxed and confident, in their friendship and be a sitting duck However it still could have certainly raised significant suspicions that Michael was the only one who died
|
|
|
Re: Why the Tahoe assassins?
[Re: Trojan]
#1022513
10/28/21 12:52 AM
10/28/21 12:52 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 89 Adelaide, Australia
lucab19
Button
|
Button
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 89
Adelaide, Australia
|
I started a thread about Roth's plan and how stupid/unnecessary it was. All he had to do was bide his time for a couple of weeks, have Michael killed in Cuba, use his connections to the Bautista regime to blame it on Castro and his rebels and he wins. Maybe, but I think it was more like a few months. That's a long time to wait. A lot could have happened in that time, such as Michael figuring out that Roth is his enemy (actually, I think Michael already knew, but didn't expect such an aggressive move from Roth), Michael making further inroads in Roth's Nevada holdings, Fredo slipping up and revealing something, etc. If there was no Tahoe shooting and Michael was to be killed in Havana, there would have been no need to recruit Fredo or backing up the Rosatos I am not sure Michael was figuring out that Roth He acts like I'm his son -- his successor is his enemy until after the Tahoe shooting I reckon that's where Roth was slippin' Michael would have turned up completely relaxed and confident, in their friendship and be a sitting duck However it still could have certainly raised significant suspicions that Michael was the only one who died You organise a massacre and have Michael as one of the many victims. Wrong place. Wrong time. A lot of hand wringing and shedding of crocodile tears.
|
|
|
|