2 registered members (Montrose, 1 invisible),
115
guests, and 26
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics42,987
Posts1,074,859
Members10,349
|
Most Online1,100 Jun 10th, 2024
|
|
|
Re: "Something in it for me"
[Re: Turnbull]
#1037952
07/30/22 05:53 PM
07/30/22 05:53 PM
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,498
Lou_Para
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,498
|
In Fredo's case,I think a safe bet would be a large sum of cash. After all,if Ola would have promised a piece of Roth's business interests.or something along the lines of bankrolling a Club for Fredo,then surely even Fredo would figure out that Mike would have known something was amiss,if anything like that came to pass. Even if it wasn't a hit,once Mike saw Fredo in a non-Corleone business 'there would have been a very intense investigation. So IMHO,the best course of action for Roth would have been to promise a nice fat envelope, perhaps as much as a half million,for Fredo.knowing that Mike would soon be a dead man. This way,they pay out nothing,and Fredo has no way to collect. I mean, what's Fredo gonna do,go to Tom and tell him that Roth had Mike killed,and he knows it because he helped set Mike up,but he was duped?
|
|
|
Re: "Something in it for me"
[Re: mustachepete]
#1037979
07/30/22 11:15 PM
07/30/22 11:15 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
Well, I'll take him at his word that he didn't know it would be a hit, which means he wouldn't be promised a piece of the Corleone operation. I'll guess he'd want to go back to his original plan, manage one or several of Roth"s casinos, with points. Fredo's word is not worth his....well....He didn't know “how do you say banana daiquiri"? Fredo: Oh -- well that's great -- Havana's great -- it's my kinda town -- anybody I know in Havana? Michael: Oh, Hyman Roth, Johnny Ola Fredo: No -- I never met them Fredo's only met superman Fredo telling Michael about Questadt was painful to watch like pulling teeth Fredo: I haven't got a lot to say Mike I was kept pretty much in the dark I didn't know all that much [yeah right] Michael: What about now Is there anything you can help me out with Anything you can tell me now Fredo: They've got Pentangeli that's all I can tell you After Fredo's outburst Michael: Is there -- you can tell me about this investigation? Fredo: The Senate Lawyer Questadt -- he belongs to Roth [finally]
|
|
|
Re: "Something in it for me"
[Re: mustachepete]
#1037981
07/31/22 02:09 AM
07/31/22 02:09 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 449
Capri
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 449
|
Well, I'll take him at his word that he didn't know it would be a hit, which means he wouldn't be promised a piece of the Corleone operation. I'll guess he'd want to go back to his original plan, manage one or several of Roth"s casinos, with points. What original plan? The Donship
|
|
|
Re: "Something in it for me"
[Re: Capri]
#1038091
08/03/22 01:38 AM
08/03/22 01:38 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635 AZ
Turnbull
OP
|
OP
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635
AZ
|
I'm going out on a limb here, but:
I'm guessing that Ola didn't promise Fredo anything specific--because he didn't have to. Here's the dialog:
"Johnny Ola bumped into me in Beverly Hills -- and he said that he wanted to talk -- he said that you and -- and -- ROTH were in on a -- a -- big deal together. And that there was something in it for me if I'd help 'em out. He said that -- he said that -- you were bein' tough on the negotiations. But if they could get a little help -- and close the deal fast -- it'd be good for the family.
MICHAEL
You believed that story. You believed that.
FREDO
He said there was something in it for me -- on my own."
I'm guessing that Ola did "bump into" Fredo in Beverly Hills. He promptly steered Fredo to the nearest lounge, plied him with drinks, all the while commiserating about how rotten it was that deserving older brother Fredo got passed over for the Donship. So Fredo, getting more drunk, and more self-pitying, was ready to listen when Ola told him that if he gave Roth and him "help" with the Cuba deal, there'd be something in it for him. That "something" was the Donship--but Ola didn't have to explicitly say it, he let Fredo infer it.
Fredo obviously wasn't in on Michael's Cuba discussions and couldn't pass on inside info to Ola that might have earned him his reward. But, when Ola asked him to open the drapes to Michael's bedroom, Fredo finally saw something he could do to get his Donship. He might have asked Ola why he wanted the drapes opened, and Ola might have said, "We just wanna take your brother away somewhere and talk some sense to him"--just what Fredo might want to hear to assuage his "conscience" (and might have led him to his "you guys lied to me" remark later). But, the only way Fredo could even have a shot at the Donship was if Michael was dead--and Fredo knew it without being told.
Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu, E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu... E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
|
|
|
Re: "Something in it for me"
[Re: Turnbull]
#1038095
08/03/22 07:02 AM
08/03/22 07:02 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,471 No. Virginia
mustachepete
Special
|
Special
Underboss
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,471
No. Virginia
|
He went to Las Vegas to learn the casino business. Edit: just restating from previous threads, the Fredo we see in GF2 is quite a break from what we've seen before. In the book, he had nearly achieved legitimacy, and under Moe he was at least in a business that was respectable to the other gangsters. The sleazy guy we see in GF2 has never been seen before.
Last edited by mustachepete; 08/03/22 08:24 AM.
"All of these men were good listeners; patient men."
|
|
|
Re: "Something in it for me"
[Re: mustachepete]
#1038128
08/03/22 06:06 PM
08/03/22 06:06 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 813
Trojan
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 813
|
He went to Las Vegas to learn the casino business. He went to Las Vegas to learn the casino business, to manage the Corleone casinos not Roth"s Exactly the long and short of it, The Donship
|
|
|
Re: "Something in it for me"
[Re: Turnbull]
#1038174
08/04/22 11:24 AM
08/04/22 11:24 AM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 773 Pittsburgh, PA
The Last Woltz
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 773
Pittsburgh, PA
|
I don't think Ola promised Fredo anything specific, and I don't think Fredo even inferred anything specific.
I think Fredo was being mostly honest with Michael about how the meeting with Ola went.
Ola recognized Fredo's desire for respect and just implied that Fredo wouldn't be stuck running Mickey Mouse nightclubs if the deal went through. That was all it took to get Fredo to betray Michael.
Fredo wasn't exactly a deep thinker, so I doubt he really considered exactly what he would end up with or how that would happen.
"A man in my position cannot afford to be made to look ridiculous!"
|
|
|
Re: "Something in it for me"
[Re: Turnbull]
#1038254
08/05/22 11:07 PM
08/05/22 11:07 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
Coppola gave us enough ammunition! in just this one dialogue among others Johnny Ola: Fredo, this is Johnny – Johnny Ola We need some more help Fredo: Johnny, Jesus Christ, what the hell time is it? Johnny Ola: Listen good, Fredo Fredo: What are you calling me here for? I don't want to talk to you Johnny Ola: Pentangeli set up a meeting with the Rosato brothers -- says he's gonna go for their deal Fredo: Oh, God -- Johnny Ola: Will he come alone? Fredo: I don't know anything -- you got me in deep enough already Johnny Ola: Just go along, everything will be alright [after Michael's murder in Havana] Pentangeli says he's willing to make the deal All we want to know is if he's on the level or if he's gonna bring his boys.... Fredo: You guys lied to me -- I don't want you to call me anymore Johnny Ola: Your brother's not going to find out we talked Fredo: I don't know what you're talking about Ola knew Fredo wouldn't know anything about Pentangeli-Rosatos meeting, let alone....same as “Fredo obviously wasn't in on Michael's Cuba discussions and couldn't pass on inside info to Ola” I believe, the phone call was a warning, veiled threat “Your brother's not going to find out we talked” Don't go squealing to your brother or else.... and to let us, the audience know who is the traitor in the family
|
|
|
Re: "Something in it for me"
[Re: Turnbull]
#1038255
08/05/22 11:07 PM
08/05/22 11:07 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
LW, your explanation is more logical than mine .(I admitted I was going out on a limb).. But, I'd like to know how you interpret Fredo's "You guys lied to me" comeback to Johnny Ola. If I may....my take, Fredo's “You guys lied to me” was because Ola didn't deliver on his promise - Michael dead and Fredo the new Don - and now Fredo is in deep.... Fredo: I'm your older brother Mike and I was stepped over! Michael: That's the way Pop wanted it Fredo: It ain't the way I wanted it!
|
|
|
Re: "Something in it for me"
[Re: Turnbull]
#1038256
08/05/22 11:07 PM
08/05/22 11:07 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
- Fredo's “there was something in it for me -- on my own"
I doubt the astute, meticulous Roth would master plan such a do or die, critical operation of murdering a Don, in his own home, in his bedroom, without specifics [on vague / implied] without making it clear to Fredo that the reward is Donship or Roth would have instructed Ola to make sure Fredo listened good and inferred it [Ref: Turnbull] Hooked! They need to ensure, imperative Fredo opened the drapes thus identifying Michael and Kay's bedroom, which is obviously of vital importance to the Tahoe shooting without which there can be no assassination and only the Donship carrot would get the job done Besides even Fredo would have known there was no way he could operate outside the Corleone business, something on his own Fredo knew the only way “Fredo wouldn't be stuck running Mickey Mouse nightclubs” is if Michael was dead Extract: He [Fredo] might have been mostly honest with Michael about how the meeting with Ola went but everything before and since was devious, dishonest, deceitful and he was quite the deep thinker, coming up with all those lies, lie after lie, he was feeding Michael Quick and Clever too including after Ola's phone call Deanna: Who was that? Fredo: Ahh -- wrong number --
|
|
|
Re: "Something in it for me"
[Re: Turnbull]
#1038266
08/06/22 07:38 AM
08/06/22 07:38 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,471 No. Virginia
mustachepete
Special
|
Special
Underboss
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,471
No. Virginia
|
and to let us, the audience know who is the traitor in the family I think the other half of the conversation is to let the audience know that Ola and Roth are the main adversaries. We're seeing one side of a chess game, and don't see much linking Ola-Roth to the shooters until we're very far along. Besides even Fredo would have known there was no way he could operate outside the Corleone business, something on his own Fredo knew the only way “Fredo wouldn't be stuck running Mickey Mouse nightclubs” is if Michael was dead I don't know how anyone can speak with this sort of certainty about what's going on - in particular what some character must be thinking. Fredo, in particular, is hard to pin down because there's no character continuity from the book to first movie, and very little continuity in GF2.
"All of these men were good listeners; patient men."
|
|
|
Re: "Something in it for me"
[Re: mustachepete]
#1038315
08/07/22 08:36 AM
08/07/22 08:36 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 449
Capri
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 449
|
Besides even Fredo would have known there was no way he could operate outside the Corleone business, something on his own Fredo knew the only way “Fredo wouldn't be stuck running Mickey Mouse nightclubs” is if Michael was dead I don't know how anyone can speak with this sort of certainty about what's going on - in particular what some character must be thinking. Fredo, in particular, is hard to pin down because there's no character continuity from the book to first movie, and very little continuity in GF2. speech bubble for what some character must be thinking
|
|
|
Re: "Something in it for me"
[Re: Turnbull]
#1038325
08/07/22 11:02 AM
08/07/22 11:02 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,471 No. Virginia
mustachepete
Special
|
Special
Underboss
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,471
No. Virginia
|
We already know by the time of the phone call,
...2. It was Roth that tried to have Michael killed
Not even by the end of the phone call, but by the end of the movie, how do we KNOW that ROTH was behind it?
"All of these men were good listeners; patient men."
|
|
|
Re: "Something in it for me"
[Re: mustachepete]
#1038341
08/07/22 06:02 PM
08/07/22 06:02 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 813
Trojan
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 813
|
We already know by the time of the phone call,
...2. It was Roth that tried to have Michael killed Not even by the end of the phone call, but by the end of the movie, how do we KNOW that ROTH was behind it? Michael told Pentangeli "It was Hyman Roth that tried to have me killed. I know it was him."
|
|
|
Re: "Something in it for me"
[Re: Kangaroo Don]
#1038523
08/10/22 01:49 PM
08/10/22 01:49 PM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 773 Pittsburgh, PA
The Last Woltz
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 773
Pittsburgh, PA
|
LW, your explanation is more logical than mine .(I admitted I was going out on a limb).. But, I'd like to know how you interpret Fredo's "You guys lied to me" comeback to Johnny Ola. If I may....my take, Fredo's “You guys lied to me” was because Ola didn't deliver on his promise - Michael dead and Fredo the new Don - and now Fredo is in deep.... The "You guys lied to me" could mean anything. It's fun to speculate but there's really no indication in the film on what he means. Maybe he said it because Ola promised him that there would be no violence. Or maybe, as TB has said in the past, it meant that it was going to be a kidnapping, not a hit. Maybe he meant what Lana said, but I don't think the Donship theory stands up to scrutiny. Really, that would be an absurd thing for Roth to promise. How could he make that happen? Did Fredo envision Roth telling people that he killed Michael and now wants Fredo to be Don? There seem to be varying opinions of Fredo's intelligence in this thread, but we know that Fredo is aware that "everyone says" he's dumb. Does he truly think that those same people would sit back and let him take over after Michael's death? That Rocco, Neri, Tom, etc. would stand aside for him? Even the dumbest version of Fredo couldn't have believed that, and wouldn't have trusted such a promise from Roth. I think it was much more of a "We'll make it worth your while" hint than an explicit promise from Roth. But, if a promise was made, I think it wasn't the Donship, but more likely the promise Roth dangled in front of Michael - control of Roth's Havana empire upon his death.
Last edited by The Last Woltz; 08/10/22 01:49 PM.
"A man in my position cannot afford to be made to look ridiculous!"
|
|
|
Re: "Something in it for me"
[Re: The Last Woltz]
#1038526
08/10/22 03:32 PM
08/10/22 03:32 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635 AZ
Turnbull
OP
|
OP
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635
AZ
|
Really, that would be an absurd thing for Roth to promise. How could he make that happen? Did Fredo envision Roth telling people that he killed Michael and now wants Fredo to be Don?
There seem to be varying opinions of Fredo's intelligence in this thread, but we know that Fredo is aware that "everyone says" he's dumb. Does he truly think that those same people would sit back and let him take over after Michael's death? That Rocco, Neri, Tom, etc. would stand aside for him? Even the dumbest version of Fredo couldn't have believed that, and wouldn't have trusted such a promise from Roth.
Once again, logic is on your side, LW. Of course Roth never could have promised Fredo the Donship because he knew, even if Fredo didn't, that Rocco and Neri would have squashed him like a bug rather than let him take over--not even Tom would have supported him. But, did Fredo in his own mind know it? We see in the Trilogy how greed and lust for vengeance blind the perps to the obvious. Could Paulie seriously think he wouldn't be the prime suspect in setting up Vito? Did Carlo have any right to believe he could get away with setting up Sonny by beating up Connie for a second time?
Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu, E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu... E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
|
|
|
Re: "Something in it for me"
[Re: Turnbull]
#1038535
08/10/22 07:00 PM
08/10/22 07:00 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 813
Trojan
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 813
|
My two cents worth! Here's the thing Roth didn't have to make the Donship happen, obviously he can't but that was never his intention, of course if that did happen, he would have Don Fredo [albeit Roth's puppet] All Roth wanted was Michael dead exactly what he set out to do and his job done He goes back to living his retired investor on a pension exactly as he planned Fredo was so consumed with being stepped over Roth knew that is the only carrot to get him, Roth's pawn, on board I reckon Lana and Turnbull nailed it - Fredo's “there was something in it for me -- on my own"
I doubt the astute, meticulous Roth would master plan such a do or die, critical operation of murdering a Don, in his own home, in his bedroom, without specifics [on vague / implied] without making it clear to Fredo that the reward is Donship or Roth would have instructed Ola to make sure Fredo listened good and inferred it [Ref: Turnbull] Hooked! They need to ensure, imperative Fredo opened the drapes thus identifying Michael and Kay's bedroom, which is obviously of vital importance to the Tahoe shooting without which there can be no assassination and only the Donship carrot would get the job done
|
|
|
Re: "Something in it for me"
[Re: Trojan]
#1038545
08/10/22 11:06 PM
08/10/22 11:06 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
My two cents worth! Here's the thing Roth didn't have to make the Donship happen, obviously he can't but that was never his intention, of course if that did happen, he would have Don Fredo [albeit Roth's puppet]
All Roth wanted was Michael dead exactly what he set out to do and his job done He goes back to living his retired investor on a pension exactly as he planned Sure thing Evita Roth's always an empty promise carrot I still believe the reward was Donship as well. “more likely - control of Roth's Havana empire upon his death” is too distant Remember Roth's been dying of the same heart attack for twenty years! My take, Fredo wants respect! now and within the Corleone empire Roth well he -- he played this one beautifully If Roth had succeeded in killing Michael, it's history making stuff, never been done before, not even Vito would have dreamt that such a thing could be possible Roth would have no further use of Fredo, sits back and waits for all the Corleones' in-fighting to be over and then perhaps even picks up, the Corleones' business after all the bloodshed and nobody, figures out it was Roth all along Fredo can't finger Roth nor show his hand, without incriminating himself in the process Checkmate! Win-Win for Roth Winner takes it all
|
|
|
Re: "Something in it for me"
[Re: Trojan]
#1038549
08/11/22 01:39 AM
08/11/22 01:39 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635 AZ
Turnbull
OP
|
OP
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635
AZ
|
Here's the thing Roth didn't have to make the Donship happen, obviously he can't but that was never his intention, of course if that did happen, he would have Don Fredo [albeit Roth's puppet]
All Roth wanted was Michael dead exactly what he set out to do and his job done He goes back to living his retired investor on a pension exactly as he planned
]
Yes, Roth's primary goal for the Tahoe attack was to get rid of Michael, who'd been horning in on his gaming empire ever since he returned from Sicily, and to blame it on Pentangeli. Secondarily, chaos would have ensued among the Corleone survivors--all of it to Roth's advantage. If Pentangeli were killed in revenge, or took it on the lam, the Corleones' NYC muscle would have fallen to the Rosatos, Roth's allies. A power struggle among Rocco, Neri and Fredo would have distracted and weakened the Corleones in Nevada. And even in the unlikely event that Fredo won, his coglioni would be forever in Roth's pocket.
Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu, E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu... E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
|
|
|
|