1 registered members (joepuzzles234),
980
guests, and 13
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics43,336
Posts1,085,984
Members10,381
|
Most Online1,182 4 minutes ago
|
|
|
What do you think? I chose Jimmy "The Hat" Lanza
#1053556
03/10/23 07:31 PM
03/10/23 07:31 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 12,454
NYMafia
OP
|
OP

Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 12,454
|
After posting our last opinion quiz about which particular Mafia boss, of the five I listed, had lived the best life and enjoyed the best underworld career, it got me thinking about the State of California.
One of the five Mafia bosses I listed was James Lanza, the decades-long boss of San Francisco, California.
So now I’d like to get everybody’s opinion about this little doozy, ok?
My question is: Which of these three Mafia bosses, who headed the three known families that once controlled the State of California, was, overall, the most successful in terms of:
- The wealth he accumulated in terms of money, assets, and legitimate businesses. - The power and influence he wielded. - The longevity of his reign. - The “quality of his life during that reign and happiness he enjoyed during his life. - How much jail time he did.
Was it…
A) James “Jimmy the Hat” Lanza (City of San Francisco) B) Giuseppe “Joe” Cerrito (City of San Jose) C) Ignazio "Jack" Dragna (City of Los Angeles) -
I'm curious as to how everyone on the forum feels about it...Who would you pick?
Last edited by NYMafia; 03/12/23 07:34 PM.
|
|
|
Re: California's Mafia Bosses, What do you think?
[Re: Hollander]
#1053620
03/11/23 09:15 AM
03/11/23 09:15 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 12,454
NYMafia
OP
|
OP

Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 12,454
|
Los Angeles was such an interesting, glamorous place, but Dragna had to deal with so many high profile violent gangsters like Roselli, Siegel and Cohen. No wonder he died of a heart attack at 67. Yep. He was the man. "Dragna" was the big name out in California. Especially that he operated in the major City of LA. And he had major pull and was well-respected on both coasts, especially in NYC. But L.A. was a tough town from the get-go. As you say, he had Mickey Cohen and a lot of other independents and semi-independents to deal with. The "Dragna brothers" and sons became notorious there. Until Apalachin came along in 57', Lanza, as well as, Cerrito mostly stayed in the shadows.
|
|
|
Re: California's Mafia Bosses, What do you think?
[Re: NYMafia]
#1053648
03/11/23 06:52 PM
03/11/23 06:52 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 12,454
NYMafia
OP
|
OP

Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 12,454
|
So aside from Hollander, doesn't anyone else have an opinion about the three Cosa Nostra Families who controlled underworld rackets throughout the State of California? Or, for that matter, the legendary bosses who headed those borgatas; Dragna, Cerrito, or Lanza?
Have at it guys! Why not go ahead and take a shot? Remember that there are NO wrong answers, because it is an "opinion" piece.
Later on, I'll throw my two-cents into the ring, regarding my opinions on the subject.
|
|
|
Re: California's Mafia Bosses, What do you think?
[Re: NYMafia]
#1053649
03/11/23 07:02 PM
03/11/23 07:02 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 29,754
Hollander
|

Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 29,754
|
Los Angeles was such an interesting, glamorous place, but Dragna had to deal with so many high profile violent gangsters like Roselli, Siegel and Cohen. No wonder he died of a heart attack at 67. Yep. He was the man. "Dragna" was the big name out in California. Especially that he operated in the major City of LA. And he had major pull and was well-respected on both coasts, especially in NYC. But L.A. was a tough town from the get-go. As you say, he had Mickey Cohen and a lot of other independents and semi-independents to deal with. The "Dragna brothers" and sons became notorious there. Until Apalachin came along in 57', Lanza, as well as, Cerrito mostly stayed in the shadows. He mostly spoke Sicilian and was also active in San Diego settled in Kensington for a while.
"The king is dead, long live the king!"
|
|
|
Re: California's Mafia Bosses, What do you think?
[Re: Hollander]
#1053651
03/11/23 09:37 PM
03/11/23 09:37 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 12,454
NYMafia
OP
|
OP

Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 12,454
|
Los Angeles was such an interesting, glamorous place, but Dragna had to deal with so many high profile violent gangsters like Roselli, Siegel and Cohen. No wonder he died of a heart attack at 67. Yep. He was the man. "Dragna" was the big name out in California. Especially that he operated in the major City of LA. And he had major pull and was well-respected on both coasts, especially in NYC. But L.A. was a tough town from the get-go. As you say, he had Mickey Cohen and a lot of other independents and semi-independents to deal with. The "Dragna brothers" and sons became notorious there. Until Apalachin came along in 57', Lanza, as well as, Cerrito mostly stayed in the shadows. He mostly spoke Sicilian and was also active in San Diego settled in Kensington for a while. Dragna was also known to be extremely close to NYC boss Gaetano Gagliano, and his then-underboss Gaetano Lucchese. Both men were suspected of having underwritten Dragna's later power play after he relocated out to California and soon took over the Mafia Family in L.A.
|
|
|
Re: California's Mafia Bosses, What do you think?
[Re: NYMafia]
#1053708
03/12/23 07:33 PM
03/12/23 07:33 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 12,454
NYMafia
OP
|
OP

Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 12,454
|
Regarding the question, "Which California boss was the most successful in terms of wealth, power, longevity, quality of his life, and jail time spent, I chose James Lanza. - He led an amazing life. But rather than try and enumerate all the reasons why I liked Lanza best, I decided to write a full biography about him. -
We should be posting it up sometime this coming week.
Last edited by NYMafia; 03/13/23 11:15 AM.
|
|
|
Re: California's Mafia Bosses, What do you think?
[Re: Fleming_Ave]
#1053761
03/13/23 01:50 PM
03/13/23 01:50 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 12,454
NYMafia
OP
|
OP

Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 12,454
|
And Dragna had to deal with cops who were mostly not Italian, didn't grow up around wiseguys, and were not willing to be on the pad like some police in the big East Coast cities. True. The west coast was very different than back east in NY, NJ, PA, NE, etc.
Last edited by NYMafia; 03/13/23 01:50 PM.
|
|
|
Re: California's Mafia Bosses, What do you think?
[Re: NYMafia]
#1053787
03/13/23 08:55 PM
03/13/23 08:55 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,815 Larry's Bar
Giacomo_Vacari
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,815
Larry's Bar
|
Jimmy Lanza, he still got headaches as boss, but his reign was not violent. His power and influence began to wane by the early 1980s, thus he started to make some poor choices. He still had San Francisco and Oakland in his fist, but the times were changing and he had a hard time adapting. He hardly made any new blood, two of the guys he made were a mistake, as one would become a cooperating witness, and the other would run a lucrative racket to the ground that the administration was taking a million or more a year, this was in the eighties so adjust for inflation. By 1985 he was ready to retire, and in 1986 when he felt there was no more Commission ( I am thinking the Paul Castellano hit), he handed the reigns to Junior (Anthony Lima Jr), but stayed active until 1989, as Sciortino declined the top spot and remained as the underboss and street boss.
"I have this Nightmare. I'm on 5th avenue watching the St. Patrick's Day parade and I have a coronary and nine thousand cops march happily over my body." Chief Sidney Green
|
|
|
Re: California's Mafia Bosses, What do you think?
[Re: Giacomo_Vacari]
#1054087
03/17/23 12:04 PM
03/17/23 12:04 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 12,454
NYMafia
OP
|
OP

Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 12,454
|
Jimmy Lanza, he still got headaches as boss, but his reign was not violent. His power and influence began to wane by the early 1980s, thus he started to make some poor choices. He still had San Francisco and Oakland in his fist, but the times were changing and he had a hard time adapting. He hardly made any new blood, two of the guys he made were a mistake, as one would become a cooperating witness, and the other would run a lucrative racket to the ground that the administration was taking a million or more a year, this was in the eighties so adjust for inflation. By 1985 he was ready to retire, and in 1986 when he felt there was no more Commission ( I am thinking the Paul Castellano hit), he handed the reigns to Junior (Anthony Lima Jr), but stayed active until 1989, as Sciortino declined the top spot and remained as the underboss and street boss. This is good info GV
|
|
|
Re: California's Mafia Bosses, What do you think?
[Re: Fleming_Ave]
#1054470
03/22/23 09:23 PM
03/22/23 09:23 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 12,454
NYMafia
OP
|
OP

Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 12,454
|
And Dragna had to deal with cops who were mostly not Italian, didn't grow up around wiseguys, and were not willing to be on the pad like some police in the big East Coast cities. Yes, I've heard that. And if I'm not mistaken there was even a gangster/cop movie made about LA some years ago where they actually highlighted incidents like that. Where the local LA cops started a real harassment campaign against known hoodlums. And the "pad" wasn't really a big thing out there. The cops weren't as receptive as back home in the east.
Last edited by NYMafia; 03/22/23 09:24 PM.
|
|
|
|