If someone is put on death row, why would you sentence them to death while they're still in their 20's or 30's? If you insist on putting a person to death, it should be done when they're in their 60's or 70's after they've served many years and are close to death because of natural causes.
Umm...maybe because it would cost the American government billions each year to sustain these criminals? As it is, it already costs the taxpayers this much in appeals.
I mean, you wouldn't be getting any money to poor people who you seem to identify yourself with.
I also find it funny how many conservatives call abortion murder, which isn't proven or true
Duh...huh...let's see....
A baby is conceived and goes through the 9 month gestation period and is born.
A baby is conceived and is either chemically poison, physically vaccum-sucked from the womb, or has its head slashed by a pair of scissors and it's brain crushed by forceps.
Not much of a grey area there, I'd say that's infanticide.
Regardless of what he or she is done, the death penalty is proven murder and you support that.
Damn straight!
Sentence people to life, not death. Cheers.
Oh, yes. I see the logic here.
Let's not kill the murdering child rapist. Sentance him to life!
But hell yes, it's a womans choice, kill that wholly innocent little baby! It is evil! Sentence THAT to death!
With our President, I'm sure that money wouldn't be used for our poor people. We'd give it to churches and our soldiers so they can have toothbrushes and hair gel.
Oh, you're right. That's why we should just let a 20 year old convicted murderer live out his entire life in prison, since, after all, the money couldn't be put to better use...
Then again, we should really have a president who gives money to baby-killers and trial lawyers. :rolleyes:
Yes. But if we allowed that, than we'd be just as inhumane as him.
Oh-fucking-well. I'd really care.
Regards,
Double-J
