Originally posted by mr. soprano:
so this is back again? well double j obviously you don't know much about human anatomy to say that she isn't doing anything to herself. brush up on biology my friend. the fact is that its inside of her...so in truth, the doctors are doing it to her! second...unless you have some proof that life starts at conception(which according to science it does not) then obviously its not murder.
For someone who tells me to look at biology, I'd check up on that yourself.
1.) She isn't doing anything to herself...the doctors are doing it to her???
WHO IS LETTING THEM KILL HER BABY? SHE IS! :rolleyes:
2.) Telling someone who has taken upper level anatomy and biology to brush up is a tad insulting.
Last time I checked, cellular respiration, the process that is synonymous with life, is carried out from the second conception occurs. The zygote divides, absorbs, excretes, and respirates, all of which are parts of the basic life functions.
If you had a clue, you'd realize science does suggest that life begins at conception. It isn't as if some dead cellular mass has the ability to grow (she'd have a rather nasty case of peritinitis if that was the case), there is a reason the cells are dividing and growing.
So, go open up a textbook, or get a clue. Whichever you prefer.
Then what about the Death Penalty?
Oh sure, make excuses, but as you say...."an act of murder, plain and simple!"
c'mon, am I wrong?
So are you saying that a wholly innocent life deserves to be killed, but a convicted murderer who has no chance of being rehabilitated and would kill again should be saved? Some kind of convoluted morality, methinks.
