MaryCas,

God Intended this, God Intended that...

Okay, what did God intend with Men having tits?

I mean really....

I guess they would have to wear a Bro or a Mansiere. :rolleyes:

I wonder if you could say the same after you had sex with me... Couldn't resist.

Was that a proposition?

Yes, but you should know, I'm a black widow.

I'd take the challenge.

Yeah, but I still believe that a Man banging another Man is the most horrendous things a Man can do.

And its okay for them to marry? Man & Man?

Nasty perverted uneducated bastards.

Also, I agree with MaryCas.

Totally.

You've heard about the pot and the kettle, I presume?

Well, if you do that's fine and dandy. Perhaps you would care to repond to this, then?:

I'll make it easy for you. Here's what MaryCas said that you "totally agree with"

Here is my response that I'd like you to respond to:
And, when your done responding to that, I'd like to hear yout response to my questions about your previous contribution to this thread, which you have so far conveniently avoided.

This post of yours:

And my response:

Debate and argument become fairly meaningless when one person makes a point, or points, and the other doesn't respond.

So, whenever you have a chance......

"Nasty perverted uneducated bastards."

I'm against Gay Marriage but what in the world does education have to do with someone being gay?
And there are a lot more perverted things going on in this world than just 2 men or 2 women having sex.

How about nasty and perverted? That a fair description?

I think I addressed that in the 2nd part of my post

Dear people, in the quotes below, you can see the difference between
1. someone who carries my total disrespect and
2. someone I don't agree with, but who I respect and who I consider normal

I think I addressed that in the 2nd part of my post [/b][/quote]So you consider homosexual sex to be perverted, although there are more perverted things going on in the world?

I guess it's not fair to ask about "nasty", since that word carries many meanings and I'm not sure which one the original poster means in this case.

I think I addressed that in the 2nd part of my post [/b][/quote]So you consider homosexual sex to be perverted, although there are more perverted things going on in the world?

I guess it's not fair to ask about "nasty", since that word carries many meanings and I'm not sure which one the original poster means in this case. [/b][/quote]I don't consider homosexuality to be perverted but the poster may, I think words like nasty and perverted are different for each person. If he thinks homosexuality is perverted I was just saying there are much more perverted things out there.

I was watching the Simpsons I think a year ago and on the episode it used the word "cuckold". After doing research I found a cuckold is a man who likes his wife to have sex with other men. I'm sure people will read this and say that that is nasty or perverted and other people who will say ok whatever and go on reading. Some people might think oral sex is nasty and perverted.

I can't/don't take objection to what people find gross or nasty, but when someone says uneducated that I can find objection with.

I think a cuckold is a man who's wife has committed adultery.

I don't think his "liking it" is part of the equation.

It would make the relationship easier if he did

Plawrence, when you see those Gay priests getting caught raping little kids, then you'd know what I mean by nasty and perverted. What were they rapping?

Little boys.

I love the simplistic logic that people have against homosexuality, kinda like that fella from Afghanistan, the one that hates wicked people as well. Osama something. Can anyone help me out here?

Really, he thinks homosexuality is "evil" and not what God intended, as MaryCas and Vito seem to believe.

All I know is, no way I want to agree with something in general with someone like that...

What do priests raping young boys have to do with gay marriage?

That's as bad as heterosexual men raping young girls, which, I presume by your definition, would also be "nasty and perverted."

Does that mean there's something wrong with heterosexual relations between two adults?

Dunno why. Maybe you should ask Sodom Hussein though. :rolleyes:

I'd take the challenge. [/b][/quote]Do you know what a female black widow does to the male after having sex with him? She chops his head off. I like that very much. Still interested? :p

Depends on which head she chops off.

You get to choose. I don't think it makes that much difference. Good one Plaw!

Vito, by what you just posted you have a problem with pedophiles not gays.

One problem is that many group gays with pedophiles, molesters, etc. This same mindset is as logical as the ideals of "Super Ancient Aryan Races" that guys like that Adolf once believed, or whatever.

Then again, many people back in the 1950s and 60s in the South really believed that if such things as intermarriage between blacks and whites, especially in the South, would lead to the country breaking down or society being destroyed, blah blah blah. Same garbage was said when people tried to keep the women and blacks from voting, or whatever progressive rights.

If I'm not wrong, gay marriage is legal from today in UK. Elton John should be among the first gays to wed.

Although I am not proud to be from the country that added the word "apartheid" (apartness) to the world dictionary, I am proud that that same country was the first in the world to legalize same sex marriage (as well as prostitution, euthanasia and perhaps in the near future also soft drugs, cannabis and marijuana that is, NOT all the other drugs that are in fact worse for you than alcohol).

The days when the church / organized religion had something to say in politics we call the dark ages (1000 - 1500 AD) over here in Europe.

As many people in the West (Europe and USA) might agree, a period of "Enlightment" where organized religion is seperated from politics so everyone can truely be free would be a good thing in eg: The Middle East looking at extremists there.

However, when I hear Mr Bush talking about "evil", "crusades", abortion, gay marriage, "right" and "wrong" etc I sometimes wonder wether the pilgrims who founded the US did in fact escape from the Enlightment in Europe. What was the date again, 1492? Mmmm...

Don't worry, our prime minister Jan Peter "Harry Potter" Balkenende will continue to lead the World towards freedom ;-)

The USA never had a period of Enlightment, nor did the Middle east had it. Result: too much focus on religion, every problem is created around religion, every conflict is being connected with religion. Ever see that in Europe? No, because it's not a good thing.

Enzo, you are making things too easy. First, USA never had an Enlightenment because they were already enlightened, since the American Revolution was basically founded on Enlightenment ideas to the point that this Revolution took even place BEFORE the French Revolution itself. Plus, from an historical point of view, Europe had a lot of religious conflicts, all over the continent, the last one in Northen Ireland.