First off, it's not a 'War' on terror. A war can be won. We cannot put every terrorist in jail or kill them all. It's just the conservative media brainwashing us.
DC - Hey, in like 60 years, all those people you listed, no one is going to care. I'm thrilled you posted that. Does anyone remember what was 2 days ago? Does Pearl Harbor ring a bell? It wasn't mentioned on the nightly news I watched at all. There was no thread made. It is all but forgotten, just like 9/11 will be.
Oh, and to the people who were actually in NY on 9/11, you don't have some kind've priviledge to now curse at me or throw insults just because you were there that day, so please refrain from doing so.
See Enzo I take no offense to mentioning Italian deaths (okay German and Japenese too lol just kidding) because they are soldiers who died fighting for their country. Their job was to defend their country against our SOLDIERS, it was a WAR. These hijackers knowingly attacked civilians, that is why they shouldn't be listed.
DMC - First, why shouldn't the hijackers be part of the people deceased? A life is a life.
Second, you're saying that the enemies in World War II should be mentioned in the number of casualties because they were part of a war. If you insist on stating that the hijackers shouldn't be on that list, does that mean that you agree with me and say that there is no 'war' on terror? You can't have it both ways.
Originally posted by Don Smitty:
[quote]Originally posted by Don Zadjali:
[b] sometimes I wonder...
is it War on Terror...
or War on Islam...
What are you kidding me? :rolleyes: If it was a war on Isalam america wouldn't have lost 2000 soldiers because we would have just wiped out that region of the world. What a foolish thing to say.
DS [/b][/quote]Wasn't it you who suggested we drop a nuke when we pull out of Iraq?
