Originally posted by The Dr. who fixed Lucy:
Now who's being naive?
It's a more credible reason than asking us to believe that Bush wanted to remove Saddam for the good of the Iraqi people.
Now who's being narrow minded?
I am not going to get into the "we shouldn't have went in," etc. debate. God knows there are plenty of topics already here on the boards if one wants to debate that.
A comment was made that we only invade countries based on their oil production, and I provided fact which anyone with a half of brain could see clearly dispells that theory.
I've provided you with fact here. Look at the percentages of the oil producing nations and do the math. It doesn't take a genius to realize that the ridiculous theory that we went in there for the oil is a weak one.
Don Cardi
