Originally posted by plawrence:
... what I do disagree with was this:
"Yeah, he deserves a fair trial, like the one that he and his cohorts gave to everyone that they were responsible for executing.....He deserved to be killed. [b]No rights, no second chances."
Which to me means that you don't think he was entitled to a fair trial in the first place.... [/b]
I'll uncharastically
put my neck out on this, but I believe that the poster was trying to say that while under the legal system Moussaoui (and any other 'terrorist' was
entitled to a trial, while he had the
right to a fair trial as does any other common scumbag criminal ... he simply didn't
deserve a fair trial and should've been taken out and the day it was discovered he was involved in the 9/11 attacks.
Just like the rest of them.
We can run that around in circles with the usual sanctimonious attitude...but I believe that's all the poster was intending to convey.
Apple
