Well, let me just say that if someone is ('scuze my French) STUPID enough to get on drugs, a person (who can secure drugs) will be stupid Not to sell them to the one stupid enough to get on drugs.

Yes, drugs are harmful, addictive and life-destroying. Still, people (from every generation) tend to START using drugs even though they know all its bad stuff. Well, how many times can you tell someone that drugs are bad. If they still want'em, why not let'em have it. It's profitable too. It's only illegalized by governments (who claim they are moral.)

However, one should also keep in mind that the so-called "illegal drugs" are fully LEGAL in Holland (The Netherlands), although it's rulled by another "fully moral" government. Which government is right? Which viewpoint is "moral"?

Hey, I'm not defending the Mafia organizations that "Force" people on to drugs (i.e. beating them up for a couple of weeks until they get addicted.) I even doubt those exist. [A flash of Untouchables just passed me when DeNiro says "...it's bad for business..."] I'm only defending those that "procure" demanded products for its customers. It just happens that some people who have the power to make laws don't think those products are good (keep in mind that there are people who get addicted to Tobbacco, Alchohol, SEX!!!, computers, work, and even Coca-Cola)...

Imagine the law prohibiting people from practicing SEX because it's "addictive", or working more than x hours a day.

No I don't think that providing such products is immoral as long as, while doing so, the supplier (the Mafia in this case) doesn't force anyone on it, nor mislead anyone regarding its effects (which is the current practice of Tobbacco and Alchohol companies.)

I mean no offence to anyone's beliefs...It's just business.