The problem is that under the system I'm suggesting each game has a rank, or a level, which makes it relative in importance of all of the other games.

The total value of the game and the ponts to be distributed among its first three finishers is based on it's rank, and the number of participants that particular season.

If you start adding "bonus points", then you are weighting more heavily those games that have segments and, therefore, bonus points as well, and making them worth more than those which don't.

And if you consider them to be two separate games, then you're making each segment of, say, Sal Cap Baseball - half a baseball season - as important as a whole football season of, say, Yahoo Football.

BY JG: If someone who's in 4th for both halves beats you, then, you didn't do well enough, did you?

That I don't understand. "Well enough" for what? If we give nothing for overall, then it doesn't matter if a guy who finished 4th in each halves beats the individual winners of each half in overall, because he gets nothing.

Why do I have the feeling that you are being deliberately argumentative? :rolleyes: