Forums21
Topics43,350
Posts1,086,308
Members10,381
|
Most Online1,254 Mar 13th, 2025
|
|
|
Re: Where would Clemenza have stood???
#31248
08/06/05 02:17 PM
08/06/05 02:17 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512 Right here, but I'd rather be ...
long_lost_corleone
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
|
Originally posted by Don Cardi: Originally posted by AppleOnYa: [b] I suppose he would've had no choice. But I also agree with dontom that had the plan to assasinate Michael been successful, Clemenza's would've soon met a similar fate.
Apple What we all failed to consider is where Al Neri figures into this whole thing. Let's remember that Neri, according to the book, had his own regime also. Now if Neri is still in the picture after a successful assassination of Michael, with his and Clemenza's regimes, there is a possiblilty that they may have been able to give Barzini a good fight.
Don Cardi [/b]I like that. I could see that happening. Anyways, I think Clemenza would have remained trustworth, And attempt to fight off Barzini. However, Barzini basically having the entire commission on his side, would have been victorious. This is all so ironic, considering Clemenza actively helped take the bosses out in Mike's big plan.
"Somebody told me when the bomb hits, everybody in a two mile radius will be instantly sublimated, but if you lay face down on the ground for some time, avoiding the residual ripples of heat, you might survive, permanently fucked up and twisted like you're always underwater refracted. But if you do go gas, there's nothing you can do if the air that was once you is mingled and mashed with the kicked up molecules of the enemy's former body. Big-kid-tested, motherf--ker approved."
|
|
|
|