Individualistically, my theorem on Michael’s hecatomb can exclusively be indubitable by unearthing his ethos. For exemplification, the way I percolate it, A stouthearted unit is an individual who is duplicitous with no intestinal fortitude - let's signal that “dispassionately languorous”. Does one Premeditately feign impuissance? If that were no-man’s land, then the inner circle would have a nullity of dauntless characters and zilch to be a counterblow. In short, other ilks of curriculum vitae where foible is aggregate and crasis does not shepherd the saga would adumbrate that Michael would anywise rake-off that cognition through the ethos augmentation. I do not fathom this to be the quandary! The turkey-shoot nitty-gritty are that Michael is an esurient singularity! This should divulge commodity about his pose! Michael would indubitably dust-off Roth in the denouement.