I have a double-question poll here. First, which ending do you think was more tragic: Michael alone with his flashbacks and conscience in GF II, or Michael dying alone in GF III? Which affected you more deeply or was more effectively executed to you?

Second, the ending image of GF II was very resonant, and I think it made the tragedy of it all indelible on the viewer's mind. You really saw that "crime doesn't pay." Do you think the opening up of the future with the GF III movie diluted that tragic image and message, or otherwise detracted from it?

Which ending was more tragic: GF II or GF III? single choice
	GF II. The final image of Michael alone with his flashbacks affected me more deeply as being tragic.
	GF III. The final image of Michael dying alone affected me me more deeply as being tragic.
Votes accepted starting: 12/31/69 08:00 PM You must vote before you can view the results of this poll.

Did the making of GF III detract from the final image or message of GF II? single choice
	Yes. GF II's final image and ending was just right. GF III was a mistake which disturbed that.
	No. GF III had to be made. I wanted to see what happened to Michael after GF II.
Votes accepted starting: 12/31/69 08:00 PM You must vote before you can view the results of this poll.