0 registered members (),
473
guests, and 48
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics43,350
Posts1,086,319
Members10,381
|
Most Online1,254 Mar 13th, 2025
|
|
|
Re: Today In History!
[Re: Don Cardi]
#390508
05/03/07 05:11 PM
05/03/07 05:11 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 45,101
DE NIRO
|

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 45,101
|
If you want to get rid of the games section then do it,i couldn't give a shit... If we lose the games forum -- De Niro loses all of his contacts and half his posts. The other games forum participants might wind up supporting De Niro just to avoid a long--destructive BB war. I think you have posted that one already about irish.. 
The Mafia Is Not Primarily An Organisation Of Murderers. First And Foremost,The Mafia Is Made Up Of Thieves. It Is Driven By Greed And Controlled By Fear.
Between The Law And The Mafia, The Law Is Not The Most To Be Feared
"What if the Mafia were not an organization but a widespread Sicilian attitude of hostility towards the law?"
"Make Love Not War" John Lennon
|
|
|
Re: Today In History!
[Re: Paul Krendler]
#390509
05/03/07 05:12 PM
05/03/07 05:12 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 45,101
DE NIRO
|

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 45,101
|
I think Bogey secretly has the hots for De Niro and thats why she always picks on him I must admit there is that certain je ne sais quoi about their exchanges. C'mon guys, kiss and make up. Or just kiss. Ha Ha. No thanks
The Mafia Is Not Primarily An Organisation Of Murderers. First And Foremost,The Mafia Is Made Up Of Thieves. It Is Driven By Greed And Controlled By Fear.
Between The Law And The Mafia, The Law Is Not The Most To Be Feared
"What if the Mafia were not an organization but a widespread Sicilian attitude of hostility towards the law?"
"Make Love Not War" John Lennon
|
|
|
Re: Today In History!
[Re: Mignon]
#390517
05/03/07 05:59 PM
05/03/07 05:59 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902 New York
SC
Consigliere
|
Consigliere

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902
New York
|
Peter Pan Peanutbutter did.
Peter Pan Peanut Butter is for pud pounding poopypants. Skippy is the only real peanut butter!!
.
|
|
|
Re: Today In History!
[Re: olivant]
#390522
05/03/07 07:18 PM
05/03/07 07:18 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,543 Gateshead, UK
Capo de La Cosa Nostra
|

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,543
Gateshead, UK
|
So, you are saying that the miracles were not supernatural events. You are saying that they are allegories. Fine, but there is absolutely nothing except one's own experience to discredit the Bible's narration of Jesus' miracles as supernatural events, right? Right. And as far as science goes, although I again do not deny anyone the right to believe in them, it is scientifically probable, as in countless millions to one that I am right in not believing they happened, and believers are scientifically countless millions to one wrong in believing they did. That is a scientific fact. The whole notion of faith is believing in something despite the rationality which opposes or questions it.
...dot com bold typeface rhetoric. You go clickety click and get your head split. 'The hell you look like on a message board Discussing whether or not the Brother is hardcore?
|
|
|
Re: Today In History!
[Re: Capo de La Cosa Nostra]
#390540
05/03/07 09:11 PM
05/03/07 09:11 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 17,300 New York
Sicilian Babe
|

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 17,300
New York
|
Capo, Believing in a higher power doesn't deny your self-faith. It enhances it. I have faith. I believe in God. I embrace many of His teachings. However, I don't necessarily believe in the Church, which, as you pointed out, has provoked wars, exploited its power of its simple faithful, and gotten rich at the expense of its congregations. The Church as an organization is often more about politics than about faith, and I make sure that I keep the two very separate.
As for the miracles, I do believe that they occurred. I believe that they still can. I believe that God can heal through His special messengers, be them saints or His only son, or a doctor that He blesses with extraordinary skills.
However, there is a difference between faith and blind faith. What you described in your post is, IMHO, blind faith.
As for peanut butter, I prefer Jif.
President Emeritus of the Neal Pulcawer Fan Club
|
|
|
Re: Today In History!
[Re: Sicilian Babe]
#390541
05/03/07 09:19 PM
05/03/07 09:19 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,900
Beth E
Crabby
|
Crabby

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,900
|
As for peanut butter, I prefer Jif.
Choosey moms choose Jif.
How about a little less questions and a lot more shut the hell up - Brian Griffin
When there's a will...put me in it.
|
|
|
Re: Today In History!
[Re: Capo de La Cosa Nostra]
#390553
05/03/07 10:17 PM
05/03/07 10:17 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,797 Pennsylvania
klydon1
|

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,797
Pennsylvania
|
So, you are saying that the miracles were not supernatural events. You are saying that they are allegories. Fine, but there is absolutely nothing except one's own experience to discredit the Bible's narration of Jesus' miracles as supernatural events, right? Right. And as far as science goes, although I again do not deny anyone the right to believe in them, it is scientifically probable, as in countless millions to one that I am right in not believing they happened, and believers are scientifically countless millions to one wrong in believing they did. That is a scientific fact. The whole notion of faith is believing in something despite the rationality which opposes or questions it. Yes, but applying scientific principles and rational thought to prove or disprove the existence of that which may be divine is an exercise in futility. Science and the scientific method are products of human thought and rationale. God, if you believe, exists in a plane of reality, not confined by the limits of science. That human thought, which is limited temporally and spacially, can not completely fathom a Being that always was and always will be, does not mean that there isn't another reality, a divine reality, that exists in a plane of timelessness. Thus the absence of evidence is not necessarily evidence of absence. And more importantly, Mignon is dead on correct. Peter Pan is the best peanut butter out there.
Last edited by klydon1; 05/03/07 10:19 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Today In History!
[Re: Capo de La Cosa Nostra]
#390559
05/03/07 10:50 PM
05/03/07 10:50 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,797 Pennsylvania
klydon1
|

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,797
Pennsylvania
|
That's an excellent post, Klydon.
But faith is still a belief in the mysterious. If science attempts to demystify our universe, religion is a rejection of such demystification. To a large extent I agree. Faith implies an adherence to something unknown or perhaps unknowable. I think science and religion are compatible. In fact, while I believe in God, I believe it is our human nature and obligation to advance scientific thought ceaselessly to - as you well stated - "demystify our universe." I celebrate scientific discovery, but just think that there are aspects of our existence that science may not be able to explain. Ithink though that that shouldn't stop science from trying to answer these questions, such as why are we all here. Who knows? maybe as human thought evolves, we will be able to prove scientifically the existence of an Almighty Being. Then science would be religion's best friend, and we would have to be pretty darn almighty ourselves. By the way, what are you still doing awake? Isn't it pretty late in England?
|
|
|
Re: Today In History!
[Re: klydon1]
#390560
05/03/07 10:54 PM
05/03/07 10:54 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,098 Existential Well
svsg
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,098
Existential Well
|
Yes, but applying scientific principles and rational thought to prove or disprove the existence of that which may be divine is an exercise in futility. Science and the scientific method are products of human thought and rationale. God, if you believe, exists in a plane of reality, not confined by the limits of science. That human thought, which is limited temporally and spacially, can not completely fathom a Being that always was and always will be, does not mean that there isn't another reality, a divine reality, that exists in a plane of timelessness. Thus the absence of evidence is not necessarily evidence of absence. And more importantly, Mignon is dead on correct. Peter Pan is the best peanut butter out there. I concur with Capo, that is an excellent post. However I would like to point out that many things that were considered divine and mysterious many centuries ago have be demystified by science today. It is plausible to believe that science will uncover some more truths in future that will possibly remove the mystery out of a few more things. 20 years ago, everyone would have laughed at the idea of cloning. Today it is a reality. It is however possible that science may fail miserably in explaining somethings in all of the future. That is where your philosophy is important. We cannot analyze divinity with scientific methods, though my education biases me to do so. One poster in an usenet forum I used to be active once said something I will always remember. you can't reason somebody out of a position which they did not employ reason to arrive at originally.
|
|
|
Re: Today In History!
[Re: bogey]
#390583
05/04/07 03:23 AM
05/04/07 03:23 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
Ice
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,474
|
I think Bogey secretly has the hots for De Niro and thats why she always picks on him  Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaa I bet she wants to give him a big smooch.  COME ON GUYS, EVERYONE SING ALONG..... Bogey and De Niwo, sittin' in a twee...
|
|
|
|