1 registered members (Ciment),
71
guests, and 37
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics43,348
Posts1,086,212
Members10,381
|
Most Online1,254 Mar 13th, 2025
|
|
|
Re: Attack On Glasgow Airport
[Re: bogey]
#410974
07/05/07 04:09 PM
07/05/07 04:09 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296 Throggs Neck
pizzaboy
The Fuckin Doctor
|
The Fuckin Doctor

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296
Throggs Neck
|
This is all just too much. I agree, Bogey. Hate is hate.
"I got news for you. If it wasn't for the toilet, there would be no books." --- George Costanza.
|
|
|
Re: Attack On Glasgow Airport
[Re: SC]
#410975
07/05/07 04:10 PM
07/05/07 04:10 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512 Right here, but I'd rather be ...
long_lost_corleone
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
|
Then Nazi's, who represented the ending of millions of human lives, felt just as you do about desicrating [sic] the American Flag. The Nazi's are fools. Additionally, they're just as confused as the people who hold pride in the American flag, because they think desecrating it will actually do something. Like I said earlier, I don't burn flags, and I don't plan to. I just don't see the point in desecrating something that doesn't even hold any real relevancy. Funny thing is that I defended you for your avatar over in the other thread! Imagine my confusion when you decided to bring it up here! My avatar demonstrates an act that hold no real significance.
Just out of curiosity, if the avatar demonstrates something of no significance why'd you pick it as something to represent yourself? Well, (and I say this in all seriousness and respect) if I'm indifferent towards the flag, what represents my indifference more so than the image of a burning flag?
"Somebody told me when the bomb hits, everybody in a two mile radius will be instantly sublimated, but if you lay face down on the ground for some time, avoiding the residual ripples of heat, you might survive, permanently fucked up and twisted like you're always underwater refracted. But if you do go gas, there's nothing you can do if the air that was once you is mingled and mashed with the kicked up molecules of the enemy's former body. Big-kid-tested, motherf--ker approved."
|
|
|
Re: Attack On Glasgow Airport
[Re: Don Cardi]
#410978
07/05/07 04:12 PM
07/05/07 04:12 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512 Right here, but I'd rather be ...
long_lost_corleone
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
|
I mean after all, a person's right is a person's right. Right? And a person's life is a person's life. Right?
"Somebody told me when the bomb hits, everybody in a two mile radius will be instantly sublimated, but if you lay face down on the ground for some time, avoiding the residual ripples of heat, you might survive, permanently fucked up and twisted like you're always underwater refracted. But if you do go gas, there's nothing you can do if the air that was once you is mingled and mashed with the kicked up molecules of the enemy's former body. Big-kid-tested, motherf--ker approved."
|
|
|
Re: Attack On Glasgow Airport
[Re: long_lost_corleone]
#410980
07/05/07 04:15 PM
07/05/07 04:15 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902 New York
SC
Consigliere
|
Consigliere

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902
New York
|
Well, (and I say this in all seriousness and respect) if I'm indifferent towards the flag, what represents my indifference more so than the image of a burning flag? OK, I still don't understand. Maybe I'm dense but it seems to me that if you're indifferent to something it means you have no real interest in it. I just don't understand why you'd pick something that you have no interest in, one way or another, as the subject of your avatar. Maybe I'm wrong, but our avatars represent a subject in which we have an interest (whether it be a movie star, a sports idol, etc.).
.
|
|
|
Re: Attack On Glasgow Airport
[Re: Don Cardi]
#410981
07/05/07 04:15 PM
07/05/07 04:15 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512 Right here, but I'd rather be ...
long_lost_corleone
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
|
Yet you totally avoided my question to you in regards to my having the same right to post a picture that I like as you do to post one that you like.
Do you deny that I have that right? Well, you certainly have the right to post it. However, the two are incomparable. After all, the burning of the flag is protected in the constitution. Where, exactly, does the constitution commend murder? Not to mention, we seem to be completely ignoring the preamble.
Last edited by long_lost_corleone; 07/05/07 04:16 PM.
"Somebody told me when the bomb hits, everybody in a two mile radius will be instantly sublimated, but if you lay face down on the ground for some time, avoiding the residual ripples of heat, you might survive, permanently fucked up and twisted like you're always underwater refracted. But if you do go gas, there's nothing you can do if the air that was once you is mingled and mashed with the kicked up molecules of the enemy's former body. Big-kid-tested, motherf--ker approved."
|
|
|
Re: Attack On Glasgow Airport
[Re: SC]
#410987
07/05/07 04:19 PM
07/05/07 04:19 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512 Right here, but I'd rather be ...
long_lost_corleone
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
|
Well, (and I say this in all seriousness and respect) if I'm indifferent towards the flag, what represents my indifference more so than the image of a burning flag? OK, I still don't understand. Maybe I'm dense but it seems to me that if you're indifferent to something it means you have no real interest in it. I just don't understand why you'd pick something that you have no interest in, one way or another, as the subject of your avatar. Maybe I'm wrong, but our avatars represent a subject in which we have an interest (whether it be a movie star, a sports idol, etc.). Don't worry, I understand where you're coming from. It's not easy to comprehend my use of the image. It is, partly, I think, my strong dislike for rednecks--in otherwise, the stereotyped social mold that we believe to be patriotic flag-wavers. And, let's face it... Rednecks seem to be America personified.
"Somebody told me when the bomb hits, everybody in a two mile radius will be instantly sublimated, but if you lay face down on the ground for some time, avoiding the residual ripples of heat, you might survive, permanently fucked up and twisted like you're always underwater refracted. But if you do go gas, there's nothing you can do if the air that was once you is mingled and mashed with the kicked up molecules of the enemy's former body. Big-kid-tested, motherf--ker approved."
|
|
|
Re: Attack On Glasgow Airport
[Re: long_lost_corleone]
#410988
07/05/07 04:24 PM
07/05/07 04:24 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902 New York
SC
Consigliere
|
Consigliere

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902
New York
|
Don't worry, I understand where you're coming from. It's not easy to comprehend my use of the image. It is, partly, I think, my strong dislike for rednecks--in otherwise, the stereotyped social mold that we believe to be patriotic flag-wavers. And, let's face it... Rednecks seem to be America personified. I'm still confused by your choice of avatar but its not important. Like I said, I was just curious.
.
|
|
|
Re: Attack On Glasgow Airport
[Re: Don Cardi]
#410990
07/05/07 04:25 PM
07/05/07 04:25 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512 Right here, but I'd rather be ...
long_lost_corleone
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
|
Well, you certainly have the right to post it. Then I've made my point. No, I don't think so. DA's last post pretty much says it best. We're not turned off by your right to post the picture. Just the fact that you find such vast enjoyment in it. It's kind of unnerving to think a man would actually wish dismay upon another man. And again, your right to post it doesn't really have much to do with it. You could be posting the picture and include a caption like "The sad effects of war" or even something much more central like "Islamic Terrorists Lay Dead" and that'd be find, and you'd still be exercising your right. Just, the fact that you actually enjoy looking at it, that's a bit scary and unusual. And that has absolutely nothing to do with your own, personal, constitutional rights.
"Somebody told me when the bomb hits, everybody in a two mile radius will be instantly sublimated, but if you lay face down on the ground for some time, avoiding the residual ripples of heat, you might survive, permanently fucked up and twisted like you're always underwater refracted. But if you do go gas, there's nothing you can do if the air that was once you is mingled and mashed with the kicked up molecules of the enemy's former body. Big-kid-tested, motherf--ker approved."
|
|
|
Re: Attack On Glasgow Airport
[Re: Don Andrew]
#410991
07/05/07 04:26 PM
07/05/07 04:26 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 18,238 The Ravenite Social Club
Don Cardi
OP
Caporegime
|
OP
Caporegime

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 18,238
The Ravenite Social Club
|
Of course you have the right to post that picture. No one is debating that. The only conflict is the enjoyment of the picture. The conflict is within yourself. It's a conflict because YOU don't agree with what someone else enjoys. And only you have the right to challenge it because it's within your civil rights. But if you agree with the content of something that you enjoy, then others don't have that same right to challenge you.  Typical of those who are always quoting the constitution and their rights when they want to advocate their beliefs. But as soon as someone else, who you may not agree with, advocates their own beliefs under those same civil rights, they are wrong. You've really helped me make my point here Don Andrew. Thanks so much!
Don Cardi Five - ten years from now, they're gonna wish there was American Cosa Nostra. Five - ten years from now, they're gonna miss John Gotti.
|
|
|
Re: Attack On Glasgow Airport
[Re: SC]
#410992
07/05/07 04:27 PM
07/05/07 04:27 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512 Right here, but I'd rather be ...
long_lost_corleone
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
|
I'm still confused by your choice of avatar but its not important. Like I said, I was just curious.
Yeah, I understand where you're coming from, completely. Don't worry about it. 
"Somebody told me when the bomb hits, everybody in a two mile radius will be instantly sublimated, but if you lay face down on the ground for some time, avoiding the residual ripples of heat, you might survive, permanently fucked up and twisted like you're always underwater refracted. But if you do go gas, there's nothing you can do if the air that was once you is mingled and mashed with the kicked up molecules of the enemy's former body. Big-kid-tested, motherf--ker approved."
|
|
|
Re: Attack On Glasgow Airport
[Re: Don Cardi]
#410996
07/05/07 04:31 PM
07/05/07 04:31 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512 Right here, but I'd rather be ...
long_lost_corleone
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
|
Of course you have the right to post that picture. No one is debating that. The only conflict is the enjoyment of the picture. The conflict is within yourself. It's a conflict because YOU don't agree with what someone else enjoys. And only you have the right to challenge it because it's within your civil rights. But if you agree with the content of something that you enjoy, then others don't have that same right to challenge you.  Typical of those who are always quoting the constitution and their rights when they want to advocate their beliefs. But as soon as someone else, who you may not agree with, advocates their own beliefs under those same civil rights, they are wrong. You've really helped me make my point here Don Andrew. Thanks so much! Your civil rights have NOTHING to do with this. This is about another persons HUMAN RIGHTS. They're dead, and that's a shame that a few human lives had to be wasted like that, just so we can have a stupid, ignorant, bullshit war that is accomplishing absolutely nothing, and being used to distill fear upon both parties. It just upsets me that you find pleasure in someone else's demise. It's not right. I have more to say, but I've temporarily lost my train of thought.
"Somebody told me when the bomb hits, everybody in a two mile radius will be instantly sublimated, but if you lay face down on the ground for some time, avoiding the residual ripples of heat, you might survive, permanently fucked up and twisted like you're always underwater refracted. But if you do go gas, there's nothing you can do if the air that was once you is mingled and mashed with the kicked up molecules of the enemy's former body. Big-kid-tested, motherf--ker approved."
|
|
|
Re: Attack On Glasgow Airport
[Re: long_lost_corleone]
#410999
07/05/07 04:33 PM
07/05/07 04:33 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 18,238 The Ravenite Social Club
Don Cardi
OP
Caporegime
|
OP
Caporegime

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 18,238
The Ravenite Social Club
|
Of course you have the right to post that picture. No one is debating that. The only conflict is the enjoyment of the picture. The conflict is within yourself. It's a conflict because YOU don't agree with what someone else enjoys. And only you have the right to challenge it because it's within your civil rights. But if you agree with the content of something that you enjoy, then others don't have that same right to challenge you.  Typical of those who are always quoting the constitution and their rights when they want to advocate their beliefs. But as soon as someone else, who you may not agree with, advocates their own beliefs under those same civil rights, they are wrong. You've really helped me make my point here Don Andrew. Thanks so much! Your civil rights have NOTHING to do with this. This is about another persons HUMAN RIGHTS. They're dead, and that's a shame that a few human lives had to be wasted like that, just so we can have a stupid, ignorant, bullshit war that is accomplishing absolutely nothing, and being used to distill fear upon both parties. It just upsets me that you find pleasure in someone else's demise. It's not right. I have more to say, but I've temporarily lost my train of thought. Point really made now!  You and Don Andrew are doing a great job on my behalf! ThankS!
Don Cardi Five - ten years from now, they're gonna wish there was American Cosa Nostra. Five - ten years from now, they're gonna miss John Gotti.
|
|
|
Re: Attack On Glasgow Airport
[Re: Don Cardi]
#411000
07/05/07 04:34 PM
07/05/07 04:34 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512 Right here, but I'd rather be ...
long_lost_corleone
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
|
I know you're just kidding, but I'm about as far as terrorists are concerned, I wouldn't say I hate them. I don't like them either. It's very sad that someone would have to retort their own dislike for something into violence. That's my one problem with terrorists, and that's my one problem with any army, despite nationality. Both the terrorists and counter-terrorist militaries are just causing one giant step backwards.
"Somebody told me when the bomb hits, everybody in a two mile radius will be instantly sublimated, but if you lay face down on the ground for some time, avoiding the residual ripples of heat, you might survive, permanently fucked up and twisted like you're always underwater refracted. But if you do go gas, there's nothing you can do if the air that was once you is mingled and mashed with the kicked up molecules of the enemy's former body. Big-kid-tested, motherf--ker approved."
|
|
|
Re: Attack On Glasgow Airport
[Re: Don Cardi]
#411006
07/05/07 04:39 PM
07/05/07 04:39 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512 Right here, but I'd rather be ...
long_lost_corleone
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
|
Of course you have the right to post that picture. No one is debating that. The only conflict is the enjoyment of the picture. The conflict is within yourself. It's a conflict because YOU don't agree with what someone else enjoys. And only you have the right to challenge it because it's within your civil rights. But if you agree with the content of something that you enjoy, then others don't have that same right to challenge you.  Typical of those who are always quoting the constitution and their rights when they want to advocate their beliefs. But as soon as someone else, who you may not agree with, advocates their own beliefs under those same civil rights, they are wrong. You've really helped me make my point here Don Andrew. Thanks so much! Your civil rights have NOTHING to do with this. This is about another persons HUMAN RIGHTS. They're dead, and that's a shame that a few human lives had to be wasted like that, just so we can have a stupid, ignorant, bullshit war that is accomplishing absolutely nothing, and being used to distill fear upon both parties. It just upsets me that you find pleasure in someone else's demise. It's not right. I have more to say, but I've temporarily lost my train of thought. Point really made now!  You and Don Andrew are doing a great job on my behalf! ThankS! I don't even think there is a point to be made here. At no point did we deny that you have the right to post that picture, and you know that. Your right to post the picture is not the issue, although you are attempting to make it the issue. The issue at hand, and I know that you are an intelligent person so I know that you are very well aware of it, whether you admit it or not, is that you are finding pleasure in murder and violence, and that is very unhealthy, cruel, and unnecessary. You and I seldom agree, there is no doubt there. But I would never find pleasure in your dismay. And, it's safe to say you 100% disagree with Islamic terrorists, but I can't understand why you'd actually find pleasure in their deaths. I can understand the media hinting that we should find pleasure in their deaths, but I can't understand anyone honestly believing that we should find this pleasure.
"Somebody told me when the bomb hits, everybody in a two mile radius will be instantly sublimated, but if you lay face down on the ground for some time, avoiding the residual ripples of heat, you might survive, permanently fucked up and twisted like you're always underwater refracted. But if you do go gas, there's nothing you can do if the air that was once you is mingled and mashed with the kicked up molecules of the enemy's former body. Big-kid-tested, motherf--ker approved."
|
|
|
Re: Attack On Glasgow Airport
[Re: Mignon]
#411007
07/05/07 04:40 PM
07/05/07 04:40 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512 Right here, but I'd rather be ...
long_lost_corleone
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
|
Hey Rednecks are human beings to LLC Let's not over-estimate them. But, in all seriousness, I don't think I would get excited over a picture of a bunch of dead, bleeding rednecks.
Last edited by long_lost_corleone; 07/05/07 04:41 PM.
"Somebody told me when the bomb hits, everybody in a two mile radius will be instantly sublimated, but if you lay face down on the ground for some time, avoiding the residual ripples of heat, you might survive, permanently fucked up and twisted like you're always underwater refracted. But if you do go gas, there's nothing you can do if the air that was once you is mingled and mashed with the kicked up molecules of the enemy's former body. Big-kid-tested, motherf--ker approved."
|
|
|
|