Like I said, it does get complicated and yes I wish the media blitz would end. I could easily do without the slams on each party. Everyone claims they don't like negative ads, but I really think most people like them, although I'm NOT one of them. They did work in destroying Kerry last election.
Anyway, from my understanding of the caucus's is: One MUST show up and literally stand and vote for a particular nominee, in front of everyone. There must be a certain number of people to stand up and say they vote for that person, or that person is eliminated (in that state caucus). "IF" that person doesn't have enough votes these people can go to their next choice (which is why Kucinich told his followers to go to Obama...he assumes he won't have enough votes). Then, from what I understand, there are many Independents and undecideds AND they claim, that young voters, if they show could have an impact. Anyone else who knows more of this procedure and or understands it differently feel free to post. I just don't think this is a fair process.
TIS
"Mankind must put an end to war before war puts an end to mankind. War will exist until that distant day when the conscientious objector enjoys the same reputation and prestige that the warrior does today." JFK
Everyone claims they don't like negative ads, but I really think most people like them, although I'm NOT one of them. They did work in destroying Kerry last election.
