Ice, how stupid can you be?
"Nowhere in the Constitution does it require one to answer to the draft."
But Article I, Section 8 of that same Constitution does empower the US Congress to raise armies and the last paragraph of that same Section empowers Congress to "make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying nto execution the foregoing powers ... (it's refered to as the Elastic Clause or the Necessary and Proper clause)" To wit: US Code Ttile 50, section 451 through 538. Your induction letter commands one to appear just as a subpoena comands one to appear. If you don't appear, you have demurred the command.
Again, as I said before, the President has the right to declare war, but that doesn't necessarily give him the right to make me fight it for him. Many appealed the Vietnam induction letter in the courts, and many won. That's a fact. You challenge ANYTHING, dude!
"No where does it specifically and unequivocally require one to pay their income taxes...no where."
"No where in writing, will the court be able to positively and undeniably prove that you've broken the law by not paying your income tax."
Title 26, Section I of the US Code defines the imposition of the income tax and Section 6301 empowers the Secretary of the US Treasury to collect said tax. Further Sections of the code define the collection process and what constitutes one's failure to comply with the collection process. So, upon your failure to comply with the collection process, the federal government's burden will be to show that you did not comply with the collection process. Having failed to comply, you have broken the law.
Yes, but that code was written was after a 1908 resolution that stated the US Government would administer NO new taxes. You can challenge on that basis.
Read more about it here:
http://nontaxpayer.org You know Einstein, you won't find any provision of the Constitution or US Code that requires that you drop your weapon when commanded to do so by a federal agent. However, US Code empowers federal law enforcement agencies to use deadly force when their agents believe their lives or well-being are threatened. It also requires that one obey the command of a federal agent. But go ahead and put yourself in the "ambiguous" situation of not doing so and see what happens. On the state and local level, there's nothing in a state law or a municipal ordinance that requires that one operate a motorized vehicle at the posted speed limit, but those same laws and ordinances unequivically state what are the consequences of not doing so.
The traffic sign serves as the written documentation of the law -- whenever one becomes a certified driver in their respective state, they acknowledge that they have been made aware of those signs and the legality that they hold.
And as far as dropping your weapon in the presence of federal agents, that's not written anywhere either b/c again, as I said earlier, that's when "boots and guns" take the place of "law and logic." The boots and guns don't need a law to tell them they can shoot anyone resisting. That's why they're the boots and guns.
