GangsterBB.NET


Funko Pop! Movies:
The Godfather 50th Anniversary Collectors Set -
3 Figure Set: Michael, Vito, Sonny

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 78 guests, and 25 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Shout Box
Site Links
>Help Page
>More Smilies
>GBB on Facebook
>Job Saver

>Godfather Website
>Scarface Website
>Mario Puzo Website
NEW!
Active Member Birthdays
No birthdays today
Newest Members
TheGhost, Pumpkin, RussianCriminalWorld, JohnnyTheBat, Havana
10349 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
Irishman12 69,753
DE NIRO 44,966
J Geoff 31,311
Hollander 27,485
pizzaboy 23,296
SC 22,902
Turnbull 19,635
Mignon 19,066
Don Cardi 18,238
Sicilian Babe 17,300
plawrence 15,058
Forum Statistics
Forums21
Topics42,985
Posts1,074,829
Members10,349
Most Online1,100
Jun 10th, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
McCluskey vs. Vito #49193
02/01/03 11:04 AM
02/01/03 11:04 AM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,849
Netherlands
M.M. Floors Offline OP
Underboss
M.M. Floors  Offline OP
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,849
Netherlands
It's impressive to see some comparasations between McCluskey and Vito. Both helped other people. We all know how Vito helped people, but McCluskey did also. He helped his study-mates, he helped the sister of his wife in Ireland with the dissease and funeral, he helped the Tattaglia family with their Club. He helped his aunts/uncles with their crisp-fields (? Don't know the word) He earned some respect from several people.

He only hadn't a whole crew beneath him. But maybe he could have been a good mobsters too!

Re: McCluskey vs. Vito #49194
02/01/03 11:11 AM
02/01/03 11:11 AM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15,058
The Slippery Slope
plawrence Offline
RIP StatMan
plawrence  Offline
RIP StatMan
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15,058
The Slippery Slope
Quote
Originally posted by M.M. Floors:

He helped his aunts/uncles with their crisp-fields (? Don't know the word)
"potato"


"Difficult....not impossible"
Re: McCluskey vs. Vito #49195
02/01/03 11:56 AM
02/01/03 11:56 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635
AZ
Turnbull Offline
Turnbull  Offline

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635
AZ
But the novel (English-language version) points out that McCluskey was "greedy and untrustworthy to do business with." Vito was a man of his word, he "never disappointed anyone" by failing to keep a pledge.


Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu,
E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu...
E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu
Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
Re: McCluskey vs. Vito #49196
02/01/03 02:04 PM
02/01/03 02:04 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,849
Netherlands
M.M. Floors Offline OP
Underboss
M.M. Floors  Offline OP
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,849
Netherlands
Quote
Originally posted by Turnbull:
But the novel (English-language version) points out that McCluskey was "greedy and untrustworthy to do business with." Vito was a man of his word, he "never disappointed anyone" by failing to keep a pledge.
Absolutely true, the Dutch also mentions that. Another interesting fact was that McCluskey didn't talk with his wife about the things he did, Vito did neither.

Re: McCluskey vs. Vito #49197
02/01/03 04:26 PM
02/01/03 04:26 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15,058
The Slippery Slope
plawrence Offline
RIP StatMan
plawrence  Offline
RIP StatMan
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15,058
The Slippery Slope
Quote
Originally posted by Turnbull:
the novel points out that McCluskey was "greedy and untrustworthy to do business with."
I couldn't find the above quote, TB, but I think the beginning of Chapter 11, Book 1, painted a contrary picture of McCluskey, that of an "honest" dis-honest cop.

"He had been a good cop, a brave cop....he was a very tough cop and a very fair one. He never...goofed off...always made his rounds...gave his stores (on his beat) a lot of protection, a lot of service...He also obeyed the system...he would never make trouble to get an extra payoff for himself...he was content with his share of the station house bag...he never tried to make extras...he was a fair cop who took only clean graft."

When Sollozzo offered him $10,000 to leave Don C. unprotected at the hospital, "he took the money in advance, and did the job. When he recieved a call from Sollozzo that there were still two of Corleone's men in front of the hospital, he had flown into a rage... being a man of principle, he would have to give back the ten grand."

Sounds like a real honorable and trustworthy guy to me confused


"Difficult....not impossible"
Re: McCluskey vs. Vito #49198
02/02/03 10:25 AM
02/02/03 10:25 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28
Canada
Gina Andolini Offline
Wiseguy
Gina Andolini  Offline
Wiseguy
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28
Canada
McClusky isn't the "oil & vinager" man he seems. He is honest, in a way that only an Italian can appreciate! grin In Italian politics, the graft that's given and recieved is simply part of business; it has no direct bearing on whether the individuals involved are "honest" or not. McClusky does his job well, and gets paid accordingly.


"Who's your father?"

"I'll give you a hint; he's Italian."
Re: McCluskey vs. Vito #49199
02/02/03 10:29 AM
02/02/03 10:29 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635
AZ
Turnbull Offline
Turnbull  Offline

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635
AZ
The "greedy and untrustworthy" quote is from Hagen to Michael, being driven back to the mall after Michael got slugged, p. 128 of the paperback.


Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu,
E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu...
E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu
Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
Re: McCluskey vs. Vito #49200
02/02/03 11:36 AM
02/02/03 11:36 AM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15,058
The Slippery Slope
plawrence Offline
RIP StatMan
plawrence  Offline
RIP StatMan
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15,058
The Slippery Slope
This was Tom's opinion, then. I really don't see the evidence for it. The book even states that one of the reasons McCluskey slugged Michael outside the hospital was because he was pissed off that now he'd have to give Sollozzo his $10,000 back. More carelessness by MP, I guess.


"Difficult....not impossible"
Re: McCluskey vs. Vito #49201
02/02/03 03:05 PM
02/02/03 03:05 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635
AZ
Turnbull Offline
Turnbull  Offline

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635
AZ
Yes, it was Tom's opinion, but his was an informed opinion, since the Corleones did lots of business with McCluskey. But I think the larger issue in this excellent thread is: Is there honor among thieves? Puzo describes the "peculiar" police "code of honor": cops will take bribes to protect so-called "victimless crimes," but "draw the line" at "blood money," like drugs and murder. By that standard of "honor," McCluskey went way over the line. In bodyguarding Sollozzo, he was helping him to establish a major US drugs ring. And by pulling the bodyguards from Vito's hospital, he was actively and knowingly setting up a helpless man to be murdered. He would have been an acccesory to murder--a capital offense in New York at the time.
Vito was scarcely blameless, too. True, he opposed drugs, but mainly because he thought drugs would menace the police and political protection he needed for his regular businesses. And they were hardly "victimless crimes." The big bucks in the illegal gambling business come less from the odds, more from loansharking--a business of broken kneecaps or worse. And every dollar Vito got from the unions was stolen from some working stiff's union dues, which were supposed to buy a better way of life for the working man.


Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu,
E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu...
E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu
Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
Re: McCluskey vs. Vito #49202
02/02/03 05:04 PM
02/02/03 05:04 PM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902
New York
SC Offline
Consigliere
SC  Offline
Consigliere

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902
New York
Quote
Originally posted by Turnbull:
But I think the larger issue in this excellent thread is: Is there honor among thieves?
As usual, Turnbull, you've come to the crux of the discussion.

We want to believe that Vito was a "better" man, and we romanticize his actions while we "look down our noses" at how McCluskey acted, but I believe that Vito and McCluskey were cut from the same cloth.

I think McCluskey's realization that he'd have to return Sollozzo's money (because he didn't properly do his job of clearing away all the "hoods" guarding Vito) was more of a business decision rather than some ethical judgment. McCluskey knew there'd be more opportunities to do business with the Mob, and he'd soon regain that large payment plus some more, but only if he returned the money first. Vito would have come to the same conclusion, and acted the same if the shoe was on the other foot.


.
Re: McCluskey vs. Vito #49203
02/02/03 06:47 PM
02/02/03 06:47 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15,058
The Slippery Slope
plawrence Offline
RIP StatMan
plawrence  Offline
RIP StatMan
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15,058
The Slippery Slope
Quote
Originally posted by Turnbull:
...this excellent thread...
I may not agree with all your opinions here, TB, but I whole heartedly agree with the above. To me, this is the kind of stuff that these forums should be about.

M.M. Floors, my compliments on an excellent topic.


"Difficult....not impossible"
Re: McCluskey vs. Vito #49204
02/03/03 10:22 AM
02/03/03 10:22 AM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,849
Netherlands
M.M. Floors Offline OP
Underboss
M.M. Floors  Offline OP
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,849
Netherlands
Quote
Originally posted by Turnbull:
But I think the larger issue in this excellent thread is: Is there honor among thieves?
Difficult. McCluskey is a thief when he does his normal things as Turnbull describes but he uses the money to help others(see first post). He earns the money with protecting victim-less crimes and stuff like that. That doesn't bother me much. (BTW There are people who steal (being thief)in order to survive. They simply don't have enough money and should find a way to get something.)

But by helping Sollozzo he is doing something totally different. Which I can link with anything except honor. The honor is lost at this point. He only thinks about the money he earns and what he should do with the money.

Quote
Originally posted by Turnbull: Vito was scarcely blameless, too. True, he opposed drugs, but mainly because he thought drugs would menace the police and political protection he needed for his regular businesses. And they were hardly "victimless crimes." The big bucks in the illegal gambling business come less from the odds, more from loansharking--a business of broken kneecaps or worse. And every dollar Vito got from the unions was stolen from some working stiff's union dues, which were supposed to buy a better way of life for the working man.
Can you explain this in easier words for me. I don't get anything of it.

Quote
Originally posted by Plawrence:M.M. Floors, my compliments on an excellent topic.
Thanks

Re: McCluskey vs. Vito #49205
02/03/03 11:07 AM
02/03/03 11:07 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635
AZ
Turnbull Offline
Turnbull  Offline

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635
AZ
Quote
Originally posted by M.M. Floors:
Quote
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Turnbull: [b] Vito was scarcely blameless, too. True, he opposed drugs, but mainly because he thought drugs would menace the police and political protection he needed for his regular businesses. And they were hardly "victimless crimes." The big bucks in the illegal gambling business come less from the odds, more from loansharking--a business of broken kneecaps or worse. And every dollar Vito got from the unions was stolen from some working stiff's union dues, which were supposed to buy a better way of life for the working man.
Can you explain this in easier words for me. I don't get anything of it.

[[/b]
I'm sorry, MM. Your postings are so good that I sometimes forget that English isn't your native language.
I meant to say that most people think that gambling, Vito's business, is a harmless activity in which no one gets hurt. But in America (and probably elsewhere), "loansharking" goes hand-in-hand with gambling. In loansharking, gangsters lend money to degenerate gamblers at sky-high rates--often as much as 6% per week. If the gamblers don't pay up on time, they get their kneecaps broken, or worse.
Gangsters like Vito often exploit labor unions. They seize control of unions by putting their own men into leadership positions. Then they plunder union treasuries and pension funds. All of that money came from working people's union dues, so union members are victimized by gangster activities.
I hope I've explained this to your satisfaction. smile


Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu,
E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu...
E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu
Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
Re: McCluskey vs. Vito #49206
02/03/03 09:53 PM
02/03/03 09:53 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 34
Stanford, CA / Boca Raton, FL
Pacino's Angel Offline
Wiseguy
Pacino's Angel  Offline
Wiseguy
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 34
Stanford, CA / Boca Raton, FL
Part of what I think is fundamentally different about the two is how McClusky punched Micheal in anger. Vito never would have done that. In fact, he wouldn't have wanted his enemy to know he was angry. At least not until he was taking his revenge. McClusky was more of a hot head.

Also, he wasn't very observant. Notice how (both in the book and in the movie) in the restaurant he's so into the food instead of what's going on between Solozzo and Micheal. Granted, he couldn't understand Italian. But if the movie is any indicfation, one look at Micheal's face and both men should've known that something was wrong. Solozzo at least showed suspicion when he frisked Micheal in the restaurant.

I doubt Vito Corleone would've let that slip his notice.


My site: http://www.freewebs.com/salome

"It's not personal, it's strictly business." - Micheal Corleone

"Leave the gun, take the cannoli." - Clemenza

"Don Corleone, I am honored and grateful that you have invited me to your daughter's wedding [pause] on the wedding day of your daughter's wedding [pause]. And I hope that their first child is a masculine child." - Luca Brasi

"My dick's on fire." - Al Pacino in The Recruit
Re: McCluskey vs. Vito #49207
02/04/03 12:47 PM
02/04/03 12:47 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,849
Netherlands
M.M. Floors Offline OP
Underboss
M.M. Floors  Offline OP
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,849
Netherlands
Quote
Originally posted by Pacino's Angel:
Part of what I think is fundamentally different about the two is how McClusky punched Micheal in anger. Vito never would have done that. In fact, he wouldn't have wanted his enemy to know he was angry. At least not until he was taking his revenge. McClusky was more of a hot head.

Also, he wasn't very observant. Notice how (both in the book and in the movie) in the restaurant he's so into the food instead of what's going on between Solozzo and Micheal. Granted, he couldn't understand Italian. But if the movie is any indicfation, one look at Micheal's face and both men should've known that something was wrong. Solozzo at least showed suspicion when he frisked Micheal in the restaurant.

I doubt Vito Corleone would've let that slip his notice.
To alinea 1: Vito one's slapped Johhny Fontane in the face. So don't use the word never.

To alinea 2: Maybe McCluskey didn't had to pay much attention. He didn't understand Italian, Michael (what Sollozzo/McCluskey thought) was weak and not a real mobster. But the best argument: there were 2 other men of Sollozzo in the restaurant. They were paid to pay attention on what was happening. According to the book they say that Sollozzo watches one of the men to see whether there is somebody at the toilet or not.

BTW Turnbull, thanks for explaining it for me! wink

Re: McCluskey vs. Vito #49208
02/04/03 01:26 PM
02/04/03 01:26 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 34
Stanford, CA / Boca Raton, FL
Pacino's Angel Offline
Wiseguy
Pacino's Angel  Offline
Wiseguy
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 34
Stanford, CA / Boca Raton, FL
Quote
Originally posted by M.M. Floors:
Quote
Originally posted by Pacino's Angel:
[b]Part of what I think is fundamentally different about the two is how McClusky punched Micheal in anger. Vito never would have done that. In fact, he wouldn't have wanted his enemy to know he was angry. At least not until he was taking his revenge. McClusky was more of a hot head.

Also, he wasn't very observant. Notice how (both in the book and in the movie) in the restaurant he's so into the food instead of what's going on between Solozzo and Micheal. Granted, he couldn't understand Italian. But if the movie is any indicfation, one look at Micheal's face and both men should've known that something was wrong. Solozzo at least showed suspicion when he frisked Micheal in the restaurant.

I doubt Vito Corleone would've let that slip his notice.
To alinea 1: Vito one's slapped Johhny Fontane in the face. So don't use the word never.

To alinea 2: Maybe McCluskey didn't had to pay much attention. He didn't understand Italian, Michael (what Sollozzo/McCluskey thought) was weak and not a real mobster. But the best argument: there were 2 other men of Sollozzo in the restaurant. They were paid to pay attention on what was happening. According to the book they say that Sollozzo watches one of the men to see whether there is somebody at the toilet or not.

BTW Turnbull, thanks for explaining it for me! wink [/b]
1. I remembered that, but I feel that things are different "inside" the family. I don't think Vito would have done that to an outsider.

2. McClusky underestimated him, definitely. But I think that Vito would've been less likely to underestimate anybody. However, he had started to slip as he didn't realize how far the Turk would go... well, he expected something, but not so quickly.


My site: http://www.freewebs.com/salome

"It's not personal, it's strictly business." - Micheal Corleone

"Leave the gun, take the cannoli." - Clemenza

"Don Corleone, I am honored and grateful that you have invited me to your daughter's wedding [pause] on the wedding day of your daughter's wedding [pause]. And I hope that their first child is a masculine child." - Luca Brasi

"My dick's on fire." - Al Pacino in The Recruit
Re: McCluskey vs. Vito [Re: M.M. Floors] #858067
08/29/15 10:01 AM
08/29/15 10:01 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,471
No. Virginia
mustachepete Offline
Special
mustachepete  Offline
Special
Underboss
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,471
No. Virginia
Originally Posted By: M.M. Floors
It's impressive to see some comparasations between McCluskey and Vito. Both helped other people. We all know how Vito helped people, but McCluskey did also. He helped his study-mates, he helped the sister of his wife in Ireland with the dissease and funeral, he helped the Tattaglia family with their Club. He helped his aunts/uncles with their crisp-fields (? Don't know the word) He earned some respect from several people.

He only hadn't a whole crew beneath him. But maybe he could have been a good mobsters too!


There are several ways in which Puzo tries to draw equivalences between mob life and the "respectable" world. There's Michael telling Kay that all the Presidents had shady characters in their family historiees, and several times Michael as a mobster makes use of or reference to his military experience. My favorite equivalence concerns the Senator on Vito's payroll: "The Senator, like Luca Brasi, was one of the great stones in the Don's power structure, and he too, with this gift, had resworn his loyalty."


"All of these men were good listeners; patient men."

Moderated by  Don Cardi, J Geoff, SC, Turnbull 

Powered by UBB.threads™