Forums21
Topics43,337
Posts1,086,010
Members10,381
|
Most Online1,245 4 hours ago
|
|
|
Re: Would you have let Carlo lived?
[Re: dontomasso]
#504265
08/13/08 03:56 PM
08/13/08 03:56 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 276 Huntsville, AL
FrankWhite
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 276
Huntsville, AL
|
If I were Michael, in his shoes... Carlo = DEAD
If I were ME, in Michael's shoes... Carlo = DEAD
"From now on, nothing goes down unless I'm involved. No blackjack no dope deals, no nothing. A nickel bag gets sold in the park, I want in. You guys got fat while everybody starved on the street. Now it's my turn." (King of New York)
|
|
|
Re: Would you have let Carlo lived?
[Re: Rushietto]
#504266
08/13/08 03:57 PM
08/13/08 03:57 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 135 Texas
Lucchese
.90 Caliber
|
.90 Caliber
Made Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 135
Texas
|
If he would take part in "offing" Sonny, then he would take part in "offing" Michael if given the chance. This is what is at the heart of his decision to kill Carlo, IMO.
"The only wealth in this world is children. More than all the money and power on Earth." --Michael Corleone
|
|
|
Re: Would you have let Carlo lived?
[Re: GoldMineTrash]
#504760
08/16/08 01:44 AM
08/16/08 01:44 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,716 Graveyard
The Iceman
Official BB Hitman
|
Official BB Hitman
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,716
Graveyard
|
If you were Michael, would you? Just wanna know what everyone here thinks. Yes I would have given the order to have Carlo killed, after that treacherous act by Carlo no way could Micheal have allowed Carlo to live, Carlo being Married to Connie wouldn't have mattered. And like Turnbull mentioned, had Michael allowed carlo to live, it would have shown that Michael was weak, thus allowing his enemies to take advantage.
|
|
|
|