2 registered members (RushStreet, 1 invisible),
543
guests, and 34
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics42,967
Posts1,074,116
Members10,349
|
Most Online1,100 Jun 10th, 2024
|
|
|
Re: CAMPAIGN 2008
[Re: olivant]
#508565
09/07/08 08:33 PM
09/07/08 08:33 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,029 Texas
olivant
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,029
Texas
|
[quote=Frank_Nitti][quote=olivant][quote=Frank_Nitti][quote=olivant] The Congressional Joint Economic Committee published its fndings in November 2007 that estimated the costs of both the war in Iraq and in Afghanistan at $800 billion. There are 1,000 billions in a trillion. Do the math. Yes, but that's 800 billion that had to be taken away from other programs who in turn had to ...borrow the funds to make up for the insufficiency caused by the allocation of war funds. Thus, when thought of in these terms--the amount of loans sought by those 'programs' who lost their funding to the war--that 800 billion figure begins to swell. That doesn't make any sense. $800 billion is $800 billion. It doesn't matter what it was spent on. You either have the revenue to spend on it or you don't. If you don't, you borrow it. Because federal reveunes from 2001 through 2006 were not sufficiient to pay for federal expenditures during those years, the Republican controlled Congress (which also formulates and approves the annual federal budgets) authorized the Treasury Departmdent to borrow approximately $5 trillion. Governments typically finish in the red each and every fiscal year, there's nothing abnormal about that. The question is, how much. You say it's 5 trillion. And I say when you combine the 800 billion spent for the war (+) additional 800 billion or so that must be borrowed to make up for the 800 billion taken away from 'programs' and allocated to the war (-) about a 1/2 trillion from that 5 trillion figure that is interest accrued (+) about another trillion or so used for homeland security here at home and at our bases and embassies around the world: you end up with a deficit of about 2 trillion and not 5 trillion, with the remaining 3 trillion (rightfully) used in the 'war on terror'...Point Being: Republican is the party of economists, not Democrat. [/quote] Where do you get these figures? They're hugely exaggerated and wrong. Where did you get 2 trillion, or 3 trillion or 5 trillion that you cite? Why do you refer to them as deficits. Do you uinderstand what a budget deficit is? It is the annual difference between what the federal government spends and the revenue it takes in. Do you understand what the national debt is? It is the unretired debt which the US Treasury owes to those who have lent funds to the federal government. The Congress has authoriized a national debt of $10.5 trillion. When President Bush took office the national debt was about $5 trillion. From then through 2006 while the Republicans were in control of the Congress, that debt rose to almost $10 trillion. Those annual Congresses made spending decisions (such as Earmarks) that greatly exceeded anticipated revenues. By the way, someone posted that the last budget surplus was under Nixon in '69. Not so. The federal government experienced surpluses 1998-2001. Also, interest on the national debt is estimated at about $250 billion annually. [/quote]
Last edited by olivant; 09/07/08 10:25 PM.
"Generosity. That was my first mistake." "Experience must be our only guide; reason may mislead us." "Instagram is Twitter for people who can't read."
|
|
|
Re: CAMPAIGN 2008
[Re: AppleOnYa]
#508599
09/08/08 06:58 AM
09/08/08 06:58 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 11,468 With Geary in Fredo's Brothel
dontomasso
OP
Consigliere to the Stars
|
OP
Consigliere to the Stars
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 11,468
With Geary in Fredo's Brothel
|
...Seriously. If You're trying to use a guy's middle name as a reason not to vote for him there is something wrong with you. How about people are using his middle name because it's his middle name. Anyway, even the omitting the middle name doesn't eliminate his decades-long association with known terrorists. Actually, that lunatic Keith Oberman initiated this association by 'middle name' thing during the primaries earlier this year...when he constantly referred to one of the Republican candidates as " Mitt 'Willard' Romney " Apple How come no one uses McCain's middle name. And what terrorists are you referring to Apple? G. Gordon Liddy? I say lets examine how many women and children McCain killed in the 25 bombing missions he flew before he was shot down. If he killed one then he is a terrorist.
"Io sono stanco, sono imbigliato, and I wan't everyone here to know, there ain't gonna be no trouble from me..Don Corleone..Cicc' a port!"
"I stood in the courtroom like a fool."
"I am Constanza: Lord of the idiots."
|
|
|
Re: CAMPAIGN 2008
[Re: dontomasso]
#508600
09/08/08 07:13 AM
09/08/08 07:13 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,724
Double-J
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,724
|
I say lets examine how many women and children McCain killed in the 25 bombing missions he flew before he was shot down. If he killed one then he is a terrorist.
Yay! We're finally confronting the liberal belief that American soldiers in Vietnam were, in fact, terrorists. Let's hope we don't have to wait much longer for them to get off their saccharine kick of how our current soldiers are "heroes" too so they can get back to their jeers and spitting and Cindy Sheehan.
|
|
|
Re: CAMPAIGN 2008
[Re: Longneck]
#508690
09/08/08 06:00 PM
09/08/08 06:00 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 8,224 New Jersey
AppleOnYa
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 8,224
New Jersey
|
...Any facts to back up your terrorist statement? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxoiZdBSi-gBy the way...how come nobody's posted any poll results today? Apple
A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government.
- THOMAS JEFFERSON
|
|
|
Re: CAMPAIGN 2008
[Re: Longneck]
#508702
09/08/08 08:03 PM
09/08/08 08:03 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,029 Texas
olivant
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,029
Texas
|
The following is from Newsminer.com, August 28:
On Oct. 22, 2006, the Anchorage Daily News asked Palin and the other candidates, “Would you continue state funding for the proposed Knik Arm and Gravina Island bridges?”
Her response: “Yes. I would like to see Alaska’s infrastructure projects built sooner rather than later. The window is now — while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist.”
Palin’s support of the earmark for the bridge was applauded by the late Lew Williams Jr., the retired Ketchikan Daily News publisher who wrote columns on the topic.
Williams wrote on Oct. 29, 2006, that Palin was the only gubernatorial candidate that year who consistently supported the Gravina Island Bridge, the Knik Arm Bridge and improvements to the Parks Highway.
Last edited by olivant; 09/08/08 10:59 PM.
"Generosity. That was my first mistake." "Experience must be our only guide; reason may mislead us." "Instagram is Twitter for people who can't read."
|
|
|
Re: CAMPAIGN 2008
[Re: Sicilian Babe]
#508764
09/09/08 01:10 PM
09/09/08 01:10 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296 Throggs Neck
pizzaboy
The Fuckin Doctor
|
The Fuckin Doctor
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296
Throggs Neck
|
She is a beautiful, intelligent and aggressive woman. Good for her. If it wasn't for the fact that she supports everything I loathe, I'd really like her!
Absolutely.
"I got news for you. If it wasn't for the toilet, there would be no books." --- George Costanza.
|
|
|
Re: CAMPAIGN 2008
[Re: Double-J]
#508768
09/09/08 02:01 PM
09/09/08 02:01 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902 New York
SC
Consigliere
|
Consigliere
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902
New York
|
Now Ted, let me behind the wheel! Mary Jo in the back! Whoo! And you ask dt why he's stuck in Vietnam? Probably for the same reason that you're stuck in Chappaquiddick.
.
|
|
|
Re: CAMPAIGN 2008
[Re: SC]
#508777
09/09/08 02:25 PM
09/09/08 02:25 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,389 Staten Island / New Jersey
Just Lou
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,389
Staten Island / New Jersey
|
McCain ahead in national polls; Obama up in electoral votes
(CNN) -- Sen. John McCain has inched ahead of Sen. Barack Obama in national polls, but the Democratic candidate holds a steady lead in the most recent Electoral College estimates.
In national surveys, McCain leads by two points -- 47 to 45 percent, according to CNN's poll of polls released Monday night.
In the Electoral College standings, the most recent survey shows 243 electoral votes either safely in Obama's column or leaning his way. At this point, McCain can claim only 189.
Many of the state polls used to determine the Electoral College standings, however, were conducted before the conventions.
Monday marked the first time McCain passed Obama in CNN's poll of polls. VideoWatch how the race has tightened »
On Saturday, Obama was up by three in the poll of polls. That lead shrank to just one point Sunday, before disappearing Monday.
In the most recent survey, eight percent of respondents said they were still unsure about who they were going to vote for.
The poll of polls is an average of five surveys: CNN (September 5-7), ABC/Washington Post (September 5-7), CBS (September 5-7), Gallup (September 5-7) and Diageo/Hotline (September 5-7). The poll of polls does not have a sampling error.
The CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll released Monday shows McCain and Obama tied at 48 percent.
The poll, which was conducted Friday through Sunday, carries a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. It was based on 1,022 telephone interviews.
Republicans are hoping that if McCain can close the popular vote gap, he can also make gains in the electoral gap. The Electoral College will ultimately decide who takes over the White House.
Although polls across the country are open on one day, the election is not a national poll but a series of 51 state-level elections that decide the members of the Electoral College.
Technically, voters aren't choosing a candidate but a slate of electors who have pledged to vote for that candidate when the Electoral College meets.
With 538 electors up for grabs, the candidate with more than half -- 270 -- wins the presidency. The number of electors from each state equals the number of senators and representatives the state sends to Congress
Both candidates are turning their focus to battleground areas as they try to stack the states in their column.
According to CNN's electoral map, the states that could go either way are Colorado, Florida, Michigan, Missouri, New Hampshire, Nevada, Ohio and Virginia.
McCain and his running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, are campaigning Tuesday in Lebanon, Ohio, just 30 miles from Obama, who is in Riverside. No Republican has won the White House without winning Ohio.
Obama's running mate, Delaware Sen. Joe Biden, is campaigning in Missouri.
Both parties are putting a lot of emphasis on Missouri. For the last century, the state has voted for the winning presidential candidate in every election except one. (Missouri picked Adlai Stevenson over Dwight Eisenhower in 1956).
McCain and Palin campaigned there Monday. They're hoping the state's landscape will help them take its 11 electoral votes.
The state has the 13th oldest population in the country, and Obama has struggled with older voters.
Also, 37 percent of Missourians are evangelical Christians, according to the Pew Forum. That's substantially higher than the 26 percent nationally.
If McCain can take Missouri and tilt the toss-up states of Florida and Ohio, which also have older populations, he will pull ahead of Obama.
|
|
|
Re: CAMPAIGN 2008
[Re: pizzaboy]
#508802
09/09/08 03:36 PM
09/09/08 03:36 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 19,066 OH, VA, KY
Mignon
Mama Mig
|
Mama Mig
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 19,066
OH, VA, KY
|
She is a beautiful, intelligent and aggressive woman. Good for her. If it wasn't for the fact that she supports everything I loathe, I'd really like her!
Absolutely. I could say the same about Obama.
Dylan Matthew Moran born 10/30/12
|
|
|
Re: CAMPAIGN 2008
[Re: SC]
#508812
09/09/08 04:27 PM
09/09/08 04:27 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,724
Double-J
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,724
|
Now Ted, let me behind the wheel! Mary Jo in the back! Whoo! And you ask dt why he's stuck in Vietnam? Probably for the same reason that you're stuck in Chappaquiddick. As always, you're such a master of obvious sarcasm, SC. Bravo. Incidentally, I'm not stuck in Chappaquiddick like poor Mary Jo Kopechne because fortunately I don't ride in cars with Ted Kennedy, nor do I let any of my friends accept rides from Ed either.
|
|
|
Re: CAMPAIGN 2008
[Re: Double-J]
#508814
09/09/08 04:35 PM
09/09/08 04:35 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902 New York
SC
Consigliere
|
Consigliere
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 22,902
New York
|
As always, you're such a master of obvious sarcasm, SC. Bravo. So, in effect you're saying that my statement doesn't rate your "Rainman" signature? BTW - I took dt's statement about VietNam as being sarcastic. How come you didn't?
.
|
|
|
|