4 registered members (RushStreet, m2w, 2 invisible),
94
guests, and 36
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics43,347
Posts1,086,194
Members10,381
|
Most Online1,254 Mar 13th, 2025
|
|
|
Re: Was Michael slippin'?
[Re: Lilo]
#559197
11/02/09 12:20 PM
11/02/09 12:20 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 11,468 With Geary in Fredo's Brothel
dontomasso
Consigliere to the Stars
|
Consigliere to the Stars

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 11,468
With Geary in Fredo's Brothel
|
Maybe there were some entertainment related things (nightclubs, call girls, film extortion?) going on in either Cuba or Beverly Hills that would have required Fredo's attention and allowed him a plausible reason to be in those places. Michael should have never allowed Fredo to go to Havana unsupervised whether it was for fun or to do any family business no matter how insignificant.
"Io sono stanco, sono imbigliato, and I wan't everyone here to know, there ain't gonna be no trouble from me..Don Corleone..Cicc' a port!"
"I stood in the courtroom like a fool."
"I am Constanza: Lord of the idiots."
|
|
|
Re: Was Michael slippin'?
[Re: dontomasso]
#559207
11/02/09 01:52 PM
11/02/09 01:52 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,325 MI
Lilo
|

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,325
MI
|
Maybe there were some entertainment related things (nightclubs, call girls, film extortion?) going on in either Cuba or Beverly Hills that would have required Fredo's attention and allowed him a plausible reason to be in those places. Michael should have never allowed Fredo to go to Havana unsupervised whether it was for fun or to do any family business no matter how insignificant. Yes but hindsight is 20/20. I don't think even Michael (who is smarter than anyone else) could have extrapolated that Fredo's incompetence and/or laziness/fear in dealing with Moe Green and the cocktail waitresses would mean that Fredo is a future liability and should be watched constantly. We don't really know what Fredo's role or responsibilities are. He's listed as Underboss on the chart but that's sort of a joke, don't you think? He has men reporting to him but according to Fredo's rant he doesn't have any meaningful responsibilities, something I think Michael would agree with. I think Michael did what he could in granting Fredo jobs or roles he thought his brother could handle. It was likely while doing one of those supposedly pedestrian jobs that Fredo complained to the wrong people and Roth/Ola were made aware of his discontent. That raises the question of why Michael wasn't aware. I think , as I mentioned before that Michael's pride blinded him to Fredo's resentments. Also more pragmatically, assuming that anyone else knew, which person among the Western regimes would want to stick his neck out and inform Michael of Fredo's discontent or meetings with Ola? Such a person would be taking a big risk. Michael didn't take bad news well. Maybe like Vito Genovese, Michael would have dealt with Fredo and then gotten rid of whoever told on Fredo, because well that person was a "rat"...
"When the snows fall and the white winds blow, the lone wolf dies but the pack survives." Winter is Coming
Now this is the Law of the Jungle—as old and as true as the sky; And the wolf that shall keep it may prosper, but the wolf that shall break it must die. As the creeper that girdles the tree-trunk, the Law runneth forward and back; For the strength of the Pack is the Wolf, and the strength of the Wolf is the Pack.
|
|
|
Re: Was Michael slippin'?
[Re: Turnbull]
#559211
11/02/09 02:10 PM
11/02/09 02:10 PM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 773 Pittsburgh, PA
The Last Woltz
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 773
Pittsburgh, PA
|
I tend to agree with Lilo that Michael probably believed that he was giving Fredo enough responsibility to keep him happy. After all, Fredo seems to relish his tour-guide role in Cuba. And someone who bangs cocktail waitresses two at a time might be expected to enjoy running a nightclub or a brothel.
While we can talk about how unperceptive Michael was, we should keep in mind his background. No blood relatives - even the rebellious and ambitious Michael - would ever have considered betraying Vito. Michael draws a distinction between "businessmen" and family members as regards loyalty. Even in the bloody world he was raised in, betrayal by a brother was beyond the pale.
Last edited by The Last Woltz; 11/02/09 02:11 PM.
"A man in my position cannot afford to be made to look ridiculous!"
|
|
|
Re: Was Michael slippin'?
[Re: The Last Woltz]
#559212
11/02/09 03:10 PM
11/02/09 03:10 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 11,468 With Geary in Fredo's Brothel
dontomasso
Consigliere to the Stars
|
Consigliere to the Stars

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 11,468
With Geary in Fredo's Brothel
|
While we can talk about how unperceptive Michael was, we should keep in mind his background. No blood relatives - even the rebellious and ambitious Michael - would ever have considered betraying Vito. Michael draws a distinction between "businessmen" and family members as regards loyalty. Even in the bloody world he was raised in, betrayal by a brother was beyond the pale. Not so sure. Michael knew he was "losing" his family well before he spoke to him mother about the subject after Havana. Recall Mama says "you can never lose your family," and Michael replies, "tempi cambi."
"Io sono stanco, sono imbigliato, and I wan't everyone here to know, there ain't gonna be no trouble from me..Don Corleone..Cicc' a port!"
"I stood in the courtroom like a fool."
"I am Constanza: Lord of the idiots."
|
|
|
|