So in a nutshell, you want socialism, which is essentially putting all the flow of economy in the hands of the government, but then claim there's no requirement for bureaucracy. And if it were to happen, there would be no corruption in the government with distributing all that money. More daydreams.
You can't make this stuff up.
'Putting all the flow of economy in the hands of the government' could easily apply to state capitalism, the very thing I've disassociated myself from in this thread.
It depends on the economy, and that would determine the government.
So to the first list above we can add:
- Socialism 'is essentially putting all the flow of economy in the hands of the government'.
'More daydreams'? You've not put a single argument forward in this thread which isn't utopian or idealist.
I think I should just shoot commies Denny Crane style. There's no point arguing.
Cool! Good luck with that. Make sure you don't do society a favour by shooting them, just make sure you do yourself one.
