No. But I'm thinking I should get a gun and should shoot some commies. And no, I don't own a house, but I still would shoot commies.
No you woodaaaant!
And I'm sorry, no matter how open minded I'm trying to be, every line of that link makes me cringe.
It's less about being 'open minded' than being rational in thought and sensitive to history thus society. I suspect you didn't read much, and if you did, I'd like to hear some actual response to it that isn't a deliberate attempt to bury one's head up one's ass and admire the puerile view therein.
Anyway, how many times has someone had their cluelessness exposed in an argument only to resort to childish humour? All answers to be sent via PM, Pizzaboy.
Oh, yes, I would. Try me.
Rational? You call seizing people's property rational? Either there is a new meaning to rational, or rational has become subjective as well.
Labor is a commodity, like any other, and its price is therefore determined by exactly the same laws that apply to other commodities. In a regime of big industry or of free competition – as we shall see, the two come to the same thing – the price of a commodity is, on the average, always equal to its cost of production. Hence, the price of labor is also equal to the cost of production of labor.
For example gold is a commodity, wouldn't price of it fall if there are more gold than what we ask for in the market? How is not taken into account?
Do I need to read passed that? And I did, and frankly, some of it only applies to 18 century England. I'm not sure how life under Queen is nowadays. Is it still like that? Only the eldest male get the state? Who else does that anymore? Don't we have mandatory state paid education for all children even under capitalism?
