That reminds me of a story from my long-ago youth:
Aeons ago, I was a reporter for the Wall Street Journal, which was pretty dull in those days. All of us read the New York Daily News avidly for its lively content.

Seemed that the Dutchess of Argyle was being sued for divorce in open court, which was pretty rare in the UK in those days. Hubby alleged that she was a nympho, regularly took on 35 guys at once, etc. Naturally the News was all over that story--they flew 3 reporters to London to provide daily coverage.

In once story, buried way in the middle, was this deathless phrase: "At one point the prosecution entered as evidence a photo purporting to show the Dutchess, nude, in bed with another man. The man could not be identified because his head was obscured."

We all thought that was an example of brilliant journalism. We posted that clipping on our bulletin board: "Why can't we get writing that that in the Journal?"