|
1 registered members (Liggio),
192
guests, and 11
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums21
Topics42,954
Posts1,073,782
Members10,349
| |
Most Online1,100
Jun 10th, 2024
|
|
|
Re: WWE Raw
[Re: Irishman12]
#627825
01/04/12 11:31 AM
01/04/12 11:31 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,746
BAM_233
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,746
|
Chris Jericho returned last night, and what does he do? Without saying a single word, he turned that crowd from cheering his return to booing him.
That's a Hall of Fame heel right there. I think it was a horrible idea, him not saying ANYTHING. I'm not quite sure I've ever seen anything like that. What were they thinking? everybody knows he is one of the best on the mic, and everybody was wanting it. all he did was troll the crowd (and showed the heel smirk of his a couple times) and left. it has to be one of the best ways to turn somebody heel. if only cena could remain silent during his promos.
|
|
|
Re: WWE Raw
[Re: Irishman12]
#632493
01/30/12 10:29 PM
01/30/12 10:29 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
ronnierocketAGO
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
|
Not to mention that WTF!?  Why not? Orton and Jericho didn't need a Rumble win notch on their belts. Sheamus was forced to turn face because of the crowd getting behind him last year, and I don't mind that earned his RR nod. I actually believe Sheamus/Bryan at WM has tons of potential,
|
|
|
Re: WWE Raw
[Re: XDCX]
#633463
02/06/12 08:39 PM
02/06/12 08:39 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
ronnierocketAGO
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,145
East Tennessee
|
The "streak" will no doubt be Undertaker's legacy upon his retirement. I can't foresee the McMahon family taking that away with him. The streak is bigger than everything else. It's an institution, it can't be undone. On another note, I sincerely hope that this Kane/Cena thing is being used to eventually turn Cena heel before his match against The Rock at WM. Whether Vince likes it or not, Cena will be the heel in that match ANYWAY, so he might as well just go with it... No no, he still got T-shirts to sell to the kids!
|
|
|
Re: WWE Raw
[Re: ronnierocketAGO]
#636152
02/22/12 08:21 PM
02/22/12 08:21 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,454
California
XDCX
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,454
California
|
Too bad CM Punk will be beating on another Chris at WrestleMania. I'd certainly love to see Punk lock in the Anaconda Vice on this loser! Chris Brown, CM Punk feud rages on: WWE wrestler calls singer a 'sad, cowardly little boy'Source: NYDailyNews.com The latest episode of Chris Brown's most recent Twitter feud just got real — and downright personal too.
WWE wrestler CM Punk has made a video in response to Brown's latest firestorm Wednesday, calling the singer "a sad, cowardly little boy."
"I never intended to include Chris Brown's name in one of my tweets to start some sort of controversy or to get publicity or anything like that," Punk begins in the video. "But now that he's thrown accusations my way about using steroids, I feel the need to reply, so please allow me to retort."
PHOTOS: BIGGEST CELEBRITY FEUDS
The wrestler, dressed in a dark hoodie and standing before a brick wall in a hallway, then goes on to rip into the singer, saying that the two of them are definitely from "different worlds."
"I don't have a manager, I don't have a bodyguard — I don't need a bodyguard," Punk says.
"I don't have an assistant, I have no need for a PR team to tell me what to tweet and when to delete tweets," he continues, in reference to Brown's tendency to lash out angrily on Twitter, only to have his messages deleted moments later.
"And I don't hit women. Period. You don't hit women."
Punk also blasts Brown for what he deems to be inadequate remorse over his brutal treatment of singer Rihanna and his poor attempt to make amends by picking up trash on the side of a highway.
The video comes in the wake of Brown's very personal attack on Twitter just one day prior, in which he questioned Punk's manliness and suggested that the wrestler, 33, uses steroids.
Instead of just sparring with words, however, the wrestler suggests that Brown should "put some gloves on" and put his money where his mouth is.
"So Chris wants to throw stones my way now and I say that's fine, but put some gloves on and get in the ring," Punk invites on the video. "I will choke you out and I will make you feel as weak and powerless and scared and alone as any woman who's had the misfortune of knowing a sad, cowardly little boy such as yourself."
Late Monday night, Punk incited the Twitter feud by posting a random message about wanting to "stomp" on Brown.
The singer, 22, quickly reacted with an angry tweet.
"@CMpunk needs more followers. He's such a leader!" the singer wrote. "Not to mention the roids hes on has made it utterly impossible for him pleasure a women."
"Growing up my dad was like 'You have a great last name, Galifianakis. Galifianakis...begins with a gal...and ends with a kiss...' I'm like that's great dad, can we get it changed to 'Galifianafuck' please?" -- Zach Galifianakis
|
|
|
Re: WWE Raw
[Re: ronnierocketAGO]
#636179
02/22/12 10:42 PM
02/22/12 10:42 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,454
California
XDCX
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,454
California
|
XDCX - that feud is amusingly stupid. And I mean "stupid" as in Brown deciding to respond to Punk. Especially a potentially libelous tweet accusing Punk of taking steroids.
Even putting aside the Rihanna angle, just from reading Chris Brown's tweets it's obviously the guy is a total punk jackass. For his Twitter account alone, I would pay to watch Punk be alone with him for 5 minutes.
But not in a wrestling ring, in a tasteless exploitive PPV storyline that Vince McMahon would love. No, in a back alley.
Except no offense Mr. Punk, but I would prefer it be...say Randy Couture...go kick his ass. Not to mention the fact that CM Punk isn't one of these stacked steroid monkeys like Ezekiel Jackson or Batista. Unfortunately, I could see Vince McMahon reaching out to Chris Brown's people to try to set something up between he and Punk. And Punk would be a fool to accept such a proposition. It would toss every bit of his credibility right out the window. He'd basically be saying "I would never lay a hand on a woman...but I am certainly not against making money off of someone else hitting a woman."
"Growing up my dad was like 'You have a great last name, Galifianakis. Galifianakis...begins with a gal...and ends with a kiss...' I'm like that's great dad, can we get it changed to 'Galifianafuck' please?" -- Zach Galifianakis
|
|
|
|
