And for the record on Hostess, here's what the very liberal Wall Street Journal reported:
Your kidding with this comment right? The WSJ is WIDELY known as a conservative newspaper, it is to conservatives what the NYTimes is to Liberals. I like/read both on a daily basis but we have to recognize when a spade is a spade and call it out.
They are widely known to support Reagan style supply-side economics and support of free markets.
"Perhaps it’s pure coincidence that a little over a week before readers go to the polls to decide the fate of Congress, the liberal Times and conservative Journal led with stories that just happen to paint their owners’ political foes as buying the election.
More disconcerting to those who look to the papers for supposedly unbiased news: The “fact” at the core of each story is at odds with the “fact” at the core of the other..."
