Won't the backdoor way to achieve "gay marriage" be to simply first call it "civil union", then slowly change it look like "marriage"? In the end, would a constitutional amendment be nothing more than a legal semantical rule for how to use the English language?

Why am I wasting my keystrokes on this pointless election year pandering? Does anyone truly believe that 38 states would ratify this?

"A refusal is not the act of a friend"