Forums21
Topics42,968
Posts1,074,161
Members10,349
|
Most Online1,100 Jun 10th, 2024
|
|
|
Re: 2004 Academy Awards
#69598
03/01/04 12:27 AM
03/01/04 12:27 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 110 Berlin, Germany
consiGliera
Made Member
|
Made Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 110
Berlin, Germany
|
nnnnh....GAH! i know this kinds of discussions are bullsh***t (no offense there) since they come down to taste at last, but this whole pro-LOTR/con-LOTR-battle starts to freak me out. even if you don´t like the TriloGy (i do, but i can well understand if people don´t like it) - you cannot deny the effort that Peter Jackson made on this project, speakinG of production ranGe/orGanization/loGistics (and YES, all this belonGs to a movie!!!). coordinatinG this kinds of thinGs is actually called DIRECTING!!! no matter if the script wasn´t the most insiGhtful (it wasn´t) and the actinG wasn´t brilliant (hell i KNOW it wasn´t) - it didn´t win this cateGory, and riGht so! but THE ALL IN ALL effort he made was spectacular. clint eastwood was in the business for decades, Jackson was doinG his first huGe project and look how he pulled it off! puttinG an almost unfilmable, meGa-complex 1000-paGes-novel to screen and keepinG the project under budGet even, can you imaGine what that means?! hell, Lost in Translation (which i love)took 27 days to shoot, LOTR took 3 years! this is not only the hype, or the CGI, it´s keepinG a huGe chunk of film toGether. and this, my friends, is effort, no matter what you think about it! sorry for the rant. off to bed now. niGht.
"i understand you have to deal with a lot of people who try to seem more important than they are. In my case the reverse is true." -Tom Hagen
|
|
|
Re: 2004 Academy Awards
#69599
03/01/04 05:25 AM
03/01/04 05:25 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,543 Gateshead, UK
Capo de La Cosa Nostra
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,543
Gateshead, UK
|
"Jesus" I whisper as I step onto the silent battlefield in the aftermath. I stayed up 'til 5 this morning (it's almost 10.30 now) and thoroughly loved the show--I was neutral until I wanted LOTR to get all eleen--they may as well have done! I can't believe the tears being shed because LOTR won so many. As much as you bash them, and as much as you personally think that other films were better, can you seriously deny LOTR the awards it recieved? Fair enough, you think Jackson shouldn't have won against Eastwood or Coppola, but can you really deny the greatness of LOTR, even if it isn't your personal cup of tea? I think it was a remarkable piece of filmmaking, and every reward it recieved was just--perhaps not the song one which Annie Lennox won, I preferred the Belle Rendevouz one personally. Overall it was a good night, but was I the only one who didn't find Billy Crystal funny at all? In fact, the funniest thing all night was Adrien Brody's freshening his breath before giving Charlize her award... Speaking of Ms. Theron, I'm not really into her to be honest. Naomi Watts was the nicest there that I SAW, with strong competition from Angelina Jolie and Samantha Norton. Mick
...dot com bold typeface rhetoric. You go clickety click and get your head split. 'The hell you look like on a message board Discussing whether or not the Brother is hardcore?
|
|
|
Re: 2004 Academy Awards
#69600
03/01/04 06:57 AM
03/01/04 06:57 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,774 New York
raggingbull2003
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,774
New York
|
I would like to make a suggestion. Now that the Oscars have passed and the saga of Lotr is over, we should never have to talk about these movies again.
I dont know what it is about these movies that gets people on here so passionate, whether it be with hate or love. What ever it is, I accept the fact that I have done nothing to help the cituation to say the least. I dont like the behavior of myself when discussing Lotr, and I dont like the behavior of some others on this board.
I suggest that we finaly, once and for all, agree to stop talking about Lotr. As much as it pains me to say this, I think it is best for all of us if we acknowledge and obey my proposal.
"You can shear a sheep many times, but you can skin him only once." -Amarillo Slim
|
|
|
Re: 2004 Academy Awards
#69603
03/01/04 09:36 AM
03/01/04 09:36 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 25,984 California
The Italian Stallionette
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 25,984
California
|
I saw the awards last night. Although I didn't see any of the movies nominated, just from the previews I've seen, including the powerful one they showed last night, I am glad that Sean Penn won. I always thought he was an excellent actor, and seemed very deserving of the award. Sofia's movie, I hear, is very good as well, and I am assuming she too, was worthy of her oscar. I don't usually see any Billy Crystal movies, nor is he my favorite comedian, but I love it when he hosts the Oscars. I thought he was pretty funny. Matter of taste I guess. TIS
"Mankind must put an end to war before war puts an end to mankind. War will exist until that distant day when the conscientious objector enjoys the same reputation and prestige that the warrior does today." JFK
"War is over, if you want it" - John Lennon
|
|
|
Re: 2004 Academy Awards
#69605
03/01/04 10:54 AM
03/01/04 10:54 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 110 Berlin, Germany
consiGliera
Made Member
|
Made Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 110
Berlin, Germany
|
BillyCrystal isn´t my favorite host either, i much prefer Steve Martin, he was hilarious last year. but i Guess he has this way to keep thinGs repectable and not embarass anyone, he´s the riGht Guy for it, since all the Academy wants is a niGht without bloopers and blunders (i´d loved to have some ). Bill Murray was my favorite for best actor but still a well-deserved win for Sean Penn. he really kept his cool up there (well, more than others) the only award that LOTR did not deserve IMO was that best sonG award. (yeah, but i won´t start that all over aGain...) basically all the oscar-nominated sonGs usually bore me to death(apart from Eminem´s 8 mile last year), but that Bellevue Rendezvous SonG really wasn´t bad, at least not Your Annual Oscar Ballad. as for the score: hottest male: adrian brody hottest chick: Naomi Watts (and am i the only one who thouGht Scarlett Johansson was cute?)
"i understand you have to deal with a lot of people who try to seem more important than they are. In my case the reverse is true." -Tom Hagen
|
|
|
Re: 2004 Academy Awards
#69606
03/01/04 11:09 AM
03/01/04 11:09 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 709 Northern NJ
Daigo Mick Friend
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 709
Northern NJ
|
Congratulations to all the winners.
Congratulations to LOTR for it's big night. It was worthy and deserved every award it received. The scope and size of the overall project is hard to imagine. Peter Jackson deserves the highest acclaim for putting it togheter, getting a team together including actors to buy into it, and pull it off. This LOTR project will be looked at as a high acheivment in film making for many years. It will become a classic like Wizard of Oz, Gone with the Wind, Laurence of Arabia etc, etc. Who will be talking about Mystic River and Lost in Tranlation in 20 years ? It deserves to be recognized as one of the most awarded films.
"Francis can I have a momment"
|
|
|
Re: 2004 Academy Awards
#69611
03/01/04 01:00 PM
03/01/04 01:00 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,078 DC
pacino princess
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,078
DC
|
the only reason I stayed up throughout the entire, surprisingly boring, academy awards last night, was to see my boy Sean win. I knew it was gonna happen but I wanted to see it. I was extremely impressed by the way he handled himself and how gracious he was, just goes to show how Hollywood is always trying to portray him as an asshole. And Johnny Depp, too. Very impressed by how HAPPY he looked...lol. He hardly EVER looks happy. All in all, I missed Steve Martin, and I thought Adrien Brody , Will Ferrell, and Jack B were more funny than Billy. I expected a little more from him, I dunno. Too bad Benny didn't win, but he'll have his chance, soon as he finishes his new film (hasn't even started yet) a biopic about Ernesto Che Guevara, the Lead actor nom will be waiting for him, I KNOW it.
|
|
|
Re: 2004 Academy Awards
#69615
03/01/04 03:36 PM
03/01/04 03:36 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,273 Hell
Mike Sullivan
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,273
Hell
|
The Academy Awards have Fucked Up Many Times IN The past.
1991, 1998, 1999, 2001.
The Silence Of The Lambs won just because JFK was too "controvertial".
Titanic won cause it was a big budget specatle.
Saving Private Ryan lost cause those people in the Academy Are Nuttyer than Squier Turds!
I say the same for "Cast Away".
Last Night they outdid themselfs...
I will never, Ever, EVER, watch the oscars Again...
Madness! Madness! - Major Clipton The Bridge On The River Kwai
GOLD - GOLD - GOLD - GOLD. Bright and Yellow, Hard and Cold, Molten, Graven, Hammered, Rolled, Hard to Get and Light to Hold; Stolen, Borrowed, Squandered - Doled. - Greed
Nothing Is Written Lawrence Of Arabia
|
|
|
Re: 2004 Academy Awards
#69617
03/01/04 04:00 PM
03/01/04 04:00 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,725 ATL
Omar Suarez
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,725
ATL
|
Originally posted by raggingbull2003: I have waited a long 3 and a half years for the lotr trilogy to get the credit it deserves and im gonna enjoy myself god damn it!!! So let me get this straight: For the past three years, our culture has been bombarded with this HUGE spectacle of CGI and Epic nostalgia, making Billions of dollars, having billions of fans, and has become the most overrated thing since Titanic, and NOW it's finally getting the credit it deserves. That makes no sense to me. This has been one of the worst Oscar Ceremony's I have ever seen. Not because LOTR sweeped everything (though that did help), but because it was so predicable. The past few years have been very controversial and surprising, that when we finally get a calmer one, it is boring. Though luckily the humor made up for it. Billy Crystal's opening was one of the funniest things I have ever seen. Especially when he spoofed "Something's Gotta Give". The Stiller/Wilson thing was funny, but they can never top what they did two years ago. The Will Ferrell and Jack Black song was also funny, and it was great to see Adrien Brody again. It seemed like he disappeared off the face of the earth when he won last year's Oscar. He was funny also. Another thing Crystal did that made me laugh was the New Zealand jokes. "Well, it's official: They've run out of people in New Zealand to thank". And after that, "People are now moving to New Zealand, just to be thanked." And whoever said it earliar was right, FFC did look proud of Sofia's screenplay win, as did Nicolas Cage. And in my opinion, Charlize looked the greatest. About the 11 wins, ROTK will never equal (or surpass) the greatness of Ben-Hur.
How am I not myself?
|
|
|
Re: 2004 Academy Awards
#69618
03/01/04 04:00 PM
03/01/04 04:00 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 69,644 The Villa Quatro
Irishman12
UNDERBOSS
|
UNDERBOSS
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 69,644
The Villa Quatro
|
Originally posted by Mike Sullivan: The Academy Awards have Fucked Up Many Times IN The past.
1991, 1998, 1999, 2001.
The Silence Of The Lambs won just because JFK was too "controvertial".
Titanic won cause it was a big budget specatle.
Saving Private Ryan lost cause those people in the Academy Are Nuttyer than Squier Turds!
I say the same for "Cast Away".
Last Night they outdid themselfs...
I will never, Ever, EVER, watch the oscars Again... They also screwed up in 1980 & last year when Martin Scorsese didn't win! I'm in the same boat with you, I don't think I'll ever watch the Oscar's again! I'll follow what happens, but won't watch them all the way through probably.
|
|
|
|