His points are by no means more credible than those of any other Godfather fan. He basically presumes that Fredo would have done everything himself, including killing those assassins, and uses this as an argument to support his case. However, he somehow overlooks that Fredo had his own men, and that it is common practise that he would have used those men to do the "dirty work" for him. If he wanted to write an objective, and unbiased article he should have considered every possibility. The reason that he declines to do this shows that he was prejudiced from the start.
So now you think Fredo had his guys do it? As if they would follow him in an attempt to take out the boss? And whatever happened to these co-conspirators?
He did not have zero motive, like I've states before, he would have always been second choice as long as Michael was around.
You can't just pull a theory like that out of thin air. There's got to be something in the movie to give some basis for it. There is nothing to suggest Rocco wasn't loyal. He basically did a suicide mission, for crying out loud.
See how exaggerated and out there some of your guys' theories get? You guys come up with these insane scenarios and then have to do all sorts of mental gymnastics to justify them.
