Originally Posted By: klydon1
Originally Posted By: olivant
Hey Kly, what do you think about this? During an episode of The Big Bang Theory, Sheldon was in traffic court and challenged his citation because he could not confront the witness against him - a red light camera. Would such a contention hold any water?


Sheldon is pretty creative, but the Confrontation Clause no more applies to traffic light cameras as it does to breathalizers in DUI cases. But like breathalizer machines, in order to admit the results of the traffic cameras, there must be some evidence, usually documentary in nature, to establish that the mechanism is properly maintained and calibrated to ensure a reliable result.

I'm no lawyer, but it's ridiculous if you ask me. That's tantamount to a murder being picked up by video surveillance, and the lawyer trying to get the videotape tossed because he can't "confront" it.


"I got news for you. If it wasn't for the toilet, there would be no books." --- George Costanza.