Comparing liberals to radical Muslims is probably the stupidest, most ignorant things I have ever seen you post, and that is saying something. Are you suggesting that a mother who has zero chance of surviving giving birth to a child should just have the child anyway? Or what if there is a near certainty that the cold is going to be born with a life threatening affliction that will cause it unimaginable pain, and which may probably end up killing it anyway? You can't see why a mother wouldn't want to bring a child into this world with such a condition? Because I personally know someone who had to make such a decision, and let me tell you, it was the hardest choice she every had to make. Her child was going to be born with many of it's internal organs on the outside of it's body. If taken to full term, the baby had a less than 25 percent chance of surviving, and the mother had a less than 50 percent chance of surviving. So until you've walked a mile in the shoes of someone who has had to make such a decision, I suggest keeping your ignorant fucking mouth shut.
I've said many times that exceptions can be made in the extremely rare instances of rape, incest, where the mother's life is in danger, or the child can't survive outside the womb. I'm talking about the vast majority of abortions that are for nothing more than selfish convenience. You and other libs know this is the case but, of course, you'll always bring up the very small percentage of abortions related to those rare instances above.
