1 registered members (m2w),
349
guests, and 32
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics43,337
Posts1,086,004
Members10,381
|
Most Online1,245 2 hours ago
|
|
|
Re: State of the Chicago Outfit
[Re: jonnynonos]
#722513
06/26/13 02:20 PM
06/26/13 02:20 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 699 Illinois
Chicago
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 699
Illinois
|
Jonnynonos, Thank you. This is what I've been saying but a couple of guys find it hard to believe. The bottom line is that Noone can say for sure how many poker machines there are on the North Side. Compared to the South Side, it would be far less. The point is that IF there are some on the North Side, DiFronzo etc. doesn't want to even know about them. Side note: There are some in Melrose Park which is technically on the North Side. However, any street rackets in Melrose park are controlled by Cicero.
Last edited by Chicago; 06/26/13 02:20 PM.
|
|
|
Re: State of the Chicago Outfit
[Re: cookcounty]
#722614
06/26/13 10:29 PM
06/26/13 10:29 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 699 Illinois
Chicago
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 699
Illinois
|
Cook County, Google I-Team Lunch with No Nose. It has Chuck Goudie trying to interview DiFronzo back in 2009. It's hysterical. Chuck Goudie, The newsman, calls every made guy in Chicago a Boss. According to him, Everyone in Cook County is a Boss. Secondly, he sensationalizes the whole thing by saying it's a meeting of the upper crust of the Outfit. John DiFronzo would NEVER have a meeting like that in a public place. NEVER. Secondly, look who's at the lunch meeting at the Loon Café: John DiFronzo, Pete DiFronzo, Joe DiFronzo & Marco D'Amico. Johnny, his 2 Brothers & Marco. All deactivated men with Elmwood Park who don't give a shit about the Outfit. If you'll notice, there's NO ONE there from Cicero or 26th St. Hardly a Mob meeting. LOL. Chuck Goudie will do anything to get people to watch him on Television. I love it when Goudie asks DiFronzo if Marco D'Amico was there eating pizza with him, and DiFronzo tells Goudie he doesn't know Marco. It's great entertainment.
Last edited by Chicago; 06/27/13 03:38 AM.
|
|
|
Re: State of the Chicago Outfit
[Re: Chicago]
#722619
06/26/13 11:09 PM
06/26/13 11:09 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809 Scotland
Camarel
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
|
Cook County, Google I-Team Lunch with No Nose. It has Chuck Goudie trying to interview DiFronzo back in 2009. It's hysterical. Chuck Goudie, The newsman, calls every made guy in Chicago a Boss. According to him, Everyone in Cook county is a Boss. Secondly, he sensationalizes the whole thing by saying it's a meeting of the upper crust of the Outfit. John DiFronzo would NEVER have a meeting like that in a public place. NEVER. Secondly, look who's at the lunch meeting at the Loon Café: John DiFronzo, Pete DiFronzo, Joe DiFronzo & Marco D'Amico. Johnny, his 2 Brothers & Marco. All deactivated men with Elmwood Park who don't give a shit about the Outfit. If you'll notice, there's NO ONE there from Cicero or 26th St. Hardly a Mob meeting. LOL. Chuck Goudie will do anything to get people to watch him on Television. I love it when Goudie asks DiFronzo if Marco D'Amico was there eating pizza with him, and DiFronzo tells Goudie he doesn't know Marco. It's great entertainment. Here's the video Chicago is talking about if anyone hasn't seen it - http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/iteam&id=6705293
|
|
|
Re: State of the Chicago Outfit
[Re: cookcounty]
#722631
06/27/13 12:43 AM
06/27/13 12:43 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 198
PP
Made Member
|
Made Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 198
|
Cook County, I didn't say there was no gambling or poker machines on the North Side. I said there were none in Elmwood Park. As far as that activity being done on the North Side, it exists. But again, DiFronzo etc. have retreated from the Outfit which means any activity on the North is being done independently or is controlled by the South Side. If you choose to believe those guys never retreated then that's fine with me. No problem. somebody up north should get everything in line before difronzo dies because cicero or the southside is gonna try to take advantage I'm surprised someone hasn't already. Seems like a huge void is just waiting to be filled. If Difronzo hasn't been really active in like 10 years, what's the hold up? Perhaps it's a lack of someone to fill the void? I can't see another family just sitting around and dying because the boss decided to hang it up. Perhaps the southern group has taken over up there and they just stay away from anyone associated with DiFronzo.
Last edited by PP; 06/27/13 11:07 AM.
|
|
|
Re: State of the Chicago Outfit
[Re: PP]
#722639
06/27/13 01:26 AM
06/27/13 01:26 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 572
Ivan
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 572
|
Jonnynonos and Chicago, You guys are great. I have been saying similar things about the Outfit on mob forums for about three years now, but not based on any firsthand knowledge or anything; my statements have always been stuff that I just inferred from the cases that are actually made in the 21st century. It is gratifying to see that others actually in Chicago can back up my hunches, and that I'm not completely full of crap. To his credit, IvyLeague has also been realistic about the Outfit. I remember everyone making such a big deal out of Family Secrets when it happened, but to me it was like some weird tough-on-crime circus held by the government to show to the public that they were still serious about taking down criminals. But to me the best way to describe what it was like was a "dinosaur hunt", if that makes sense. I know the defendants in that case weren't the kind of people you should feel sorry for, but I almost did. Those convictions would be a great thing to have on your resume if you're a cop or a prosecutor though! "I took down the heirs of Al Capone!" So badass! Chuck Goudie is unintentional comedy gold. The way DiFronzo just looks at him in that stupid ambush interview is hysterical.
|
|
|
Re: State of the Chicago Outfit
[Re: Ivan]
#722647
06/27/13 04:21 AM
06/27/13 04:21 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 699 Illinois
Chicago
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 699
Illinois
|
Ivan, You're absolutely correct. The Family Secrets Trial was largely a 'Dog and Pony' Show put on by the Government. Joey Lombardo already had retreated from the Outfit many years prior. Frank Calabrese was ALREADY in prison and off the streets. The other guys were insignificant and were convicted of crimes they did years ago. The only guy they got who MEANT ANYTHING was JIMMY MARCELLO. Jimmy is the guy who could have invested some of his money, commanded leadership and made some new men. He is REALLY the only guy they got that hurts the CURRENT Outfit. When Jimmy went away in 1993 with Carlisi, the Government ordered him to make $12 Million Dollar restitution in the form of Money and property! Jimmy made a lot of money for himself and knows the streets.
As far as DiFronzo is concerned. Back in 1986 when the Spilotro Brothers were killed, He was the Boss of Elmwood Park and the Underboss of the ENTIRE Outfit. Auippa and Cerone ordered the murders before they went to prison and Carlisi & DiFronzo carried them out. Everybody knows it but nobody can prove it. You cannot convict a man SOLEY on the word of an informant. There has to be at least one other strong piece of evidence to go with it. However, I am surprised the Government didn't even try. WHAT DID THEY REALLY HAVE TO LOSE? Unless they're putting something together right now?
Lastly, either DiFronzo is the smartest, luckiest, most politically connected Boss in the History of the very once proud Outfit, or he is a dry snitch and has made a deal to be left alone in return for retreating with the top men in his crew so they can all be left alone. It's one or the other. Take your choice.
Last edited by Chicago; 06/27/13 04:47 AM.
|
|
|
Re: State of the Chicago Outfit
[Re: Chicago]
#722650
06/27/13 05:01 AM
06/27/13 05:01 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 572
Ivan
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 572
|
The only guy they got who MEANT ANYTHING was JIMMY MARCELLO.
You know, I almost posted this opinion myself, but I wasn't 100% sure if it was true. Did he actually have intent of rebuilding the Outfit? I half suspect that even he knew that it was time to hang it the fuck up, but I don't know the whole story with him.
|
|
|
Re: State of the Chicago Outfit
[Re: cookcounty]
#722727
06/27/13 01:33 PM
06/27/13 01:33 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 699 Illinois
Chicago
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 699
Illinois
|
Cook County, Jimmy Marcello did about 9 years in jail from 1993 to about 2001 or 2002. He got out of jail because HE SERVED ALL HIS TIME.
Last edited by Chicago; 06/27/13 01:38 PM.
|
|
|
Re: State of the Chicago Outfit
[Re: jonnynonos]
#722757
06/27/13 03:45 PM
06/27/13 03:45 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 699 Illinois
Chicago
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 699
Illinois
|
You're both right. It was Frank Jr. who wrote the letter to the Feds in 1998 or 1999 that started the whole ball rolling. Then, Nick flipped later. Why did Frank Jr. write the letter? Answer: He had stolen about $600,000 Dollars from his father's stash of cash. He didn't want to face his father so it was easier for him to keep him in jail. Frank Jr. was a drug user so he had that lying manipulating addict personality. That was the bottom line for the reason Frank Jr. wrote the letter. I have no idea of his drug usage presently. But, once an addict etc....
Last edited by Chicago; 06/27/13 03:46 PM.
|
|
|
Re: State of the Chicago Outfit
[Re: cookcounty]
#722842
06/27/13 08:39 PM
06/27/13 08:39 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 699 Illinois
Chicago
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 699
Illinois
|
Cook County, Yeh, it could have been 2003, I don't have all those dates memorized. LOL. Ivy probably knows. Anyway, the point is that Marcello did several years in jail. When he got out, it was understood that he was the Boss. DiFronzo did not want any part of it.
Last edited by Chicago; 06/27/13 08:39 PM.
|
|
|
Re: State of the Chicago Outfit
[Re: Chicago]
#722864
06/27/13 10:08 PM
06/27/13 10:08 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 691
GaryMartin
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 691
|
A few weeks ago Johnnynonos was talking about Joe Lombardo and I made the erroneous statement that "there was a mountain of evidence against him." There was not. I followed the FS trial and I don't know what I was thinking . Musta hit my head on something.
Jimmy Marcello was in about the same position as Lombardo. If memory serves me well, I believe all the govt had was Michael Spilotro's daughter recognizing his voice out of a recording of 5 or 6 people. Of course they had Nick Calabrese. At the conclusion of the trial, Judge Zagel opioned that Marcello had more ability than his co-defendants. Zagel also would not allow a voice identification expert to testify, saying he had nothing to offer the jury that would be relevant.
I listened to the oral arguments from the Seventh Court Of Appeals (online) and to be very frank, I was surprised at the weak presentation by the govt. It was very, very weak. Apparently they had put all their eggs in one basket with N. Calabrese and thought his testimony would result in convictions, and it did.
The three judge panel of Posner, Woods, and (cant't remember the 3rd one) upheld the district court's decision by a 2-1 vote, with Diane Wood dissenting. This was an interesting case because of the double jeopardy issue. Marcello and Calabrese had both done time for some of the crimes that were included in the indictment. But there were additional charges. IMO there appeared to be two issues: 1. Where does one conspiracy stop and another begin? 2. Did Marcello and Calabrese operate as independent street crews or did they commit crimes for The Outfit ? Posner and the other judge felt that crimes were committed by two different entities ( Street Crews and The Outfit) but by the same people. Judge Wood disagreed.
In my opinion these guys got what they deserved, BUT when you take a really hard look at the entire case, the govt may have been very lucky. Both Marcello and Calabrese had "pulled time" for some of the charges the govt presented, and the overlapping of conspiracy cases (RICO included), was certainly questionable.
Last edited by GaryMartin; 06/28/13 01:08 AM.
|
|
|
|