Forums21
Topics43,347
Posts1,086,200
Members10,381
|
Most Online1,254 Mar 13th, 2025
|
|
|
Fredo must die?
#751061
12/02/13 02:23 AM
12/02/13 02:23 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1
poorfredo
OP
Associate
|
OP
Associate
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1
|
hello. i am a superfan of Godfather. i like mike but i do not understand why fredo must die. fredo is so sweet. he is not a traitor any more.
Last edited by poorfredo; 12/02/13 02:25 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Fredo must die?
[Re: poorfredo]
#751179
12/02/13 08:02 PM
12/02/13 08:02 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 385 Tampa, FL
waynethegame
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 385
Tampa, FL
|
This has been discussed elsewhere but it boils down to the fact that Fredo had showed twice that he would side against the family (first time with Moe Green, and second with Hyman Roth) and that he could be swayed to act against the family.
I personally think that he would not have been killed if he didn't have that outburst in the boathouse about being passed over; that showed Michael that he *resented* him for being the Don, and THAT meant that Fredo could never be trusted. Even if he was sent away into exile and nobody in the family dealt with him, he could still provide some information to people who wanted to ruin Michael, and likely would have out of resentment. Remember, he was swayed by Hyman Roth by the promise of something for himself, something more than just running a Mickey Mouse nightclub. Who's to say some other gangster wouldn't make him the same promise later on?
Imagine if Fredo wasn't killed; what if Don Altobello or Joey Zasa or Don Luchessi or someone else approached him with the same promise? Help us eliminate Michael and you'll be the new Don of the Corleones. I think the temptation would have been too strong once again for Fredo, as deep down he would still regret being treated like a schmuck (and if he hadn't been killed, would likely harbor even more resentment over being kicked out of the Family, as it were).
Fredo HAD to die, because otherwise there would be no guarantee that he wouldn't try the same thing again.
Wayne
"Finance is a gun. Politics is knowing when to pull the trigger." Don Lucchesi
|
|
|
Re: Fredo must die?
[Re: waynethegame]
#751210
12/02/13 11:06 PM
12/02/13 11:06 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,697 AZ
Turnbull
|

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,697
AZ
|
I personally think that he would not have been killed if he didn't have that outburst in the boathouse about being passed over; that showed Michael that he *resented* him for being the Don, and THAT meant that Fredo could never be trusted. Fredo HAD to die, because otherwise there would be no guarantee that he wouldn't try the same thing again. Absolutely right! Also, Fredo knew that Pentangeli had survived, and that the Senate lawyer, Questadt, "belonged to Roth." Had he told Michael before Michael testified before the Senate committee, Michael could have avoided opening himself up to five counts of perjury. But Fredo didn't tell Michael until after he committed perjury.
Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu, E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu... E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
|
|
|
Re: Fredo must die?
[Re: paprincess]
#751249
12/03/13 10:09 AM
12/03/13 10:09 AM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 773 Pittsburgh, PA
The Last Woltz
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 773
Pittsburgh, PA
|
Good answer Turnbull, I missed the part about Fredo knowing about Pentangeli and the lawyer. Did he confess this to Michael after Michael confronted him about knowing Johnny Ola? During the outburst at the boat house? I think if Fredo would have confessed to Michael he was manipulated by Roth and Johnny Ola after they shot at the house and then called Fredo on the phone when his wife was asleep he could have avoided being killed. In the boathouse. I don't know if Fredo ever could have avoided being killed. Not to re-hash the whole discussion, but I disagree that Fredo was killed because of any potential threat that he posed to Michael. If Michael felt Fredo was a threat, he never would have allowed him to live as long as Mama was alive, much less allow him to visit the compound. Fredo was killed because, as Michael himself says in GFIII, he "injured" Michael. Whether Michael would have been less injured had Fredo come clean on his own is an interesting point of discussion. I tend to think that Michael still would have killed Fredo, because Fredo's treachery led to an attack on Michael "in my home! In my bedroom, where my wife sleeps! Where my children come and play with their toys." This cuts close to Michael's ultimate hypocrisy, that his efforts to "protect" his Family really endangered them. It would be easier for Michael to kill Fredo than to face that.
"A man in my position cannot afford to be made to look ridiculous!"
|
|
|
Re: Fredo must die?
[Re: The Last Woltz]
#751255
12/03/13 10:59 AM
12/03/13 10:59 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 98 New York, NY
Questadt
Button
|
Button
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 98
New York, NY
|
At least this one thing should have been clear to Fredo - right from the start of Michael's ascendancy to the donship: That Michael was utterly treacherous and ruthless, and that if Michael ever felt personally threatened, or felt that the family business was in danger, not even the bonds of brotherhood would keep Fredo safe from Michael's wrath.
Under the circumstances, had I been in Fredo's shoes, I would have been quite content to manage a "Mickey Mouse nightclub" - if it meant that I was removed from all the cutthroat machinations of the family business. I'd have taken care of business, patiently worked my way up - and ultimately asked Michael for a 100% legit business of my own, so as to stay entirely clear of all the murder & mayhem.
And if by chance I had been stupid enough to get taken in by Hyman Roth & Johnny Ola, I think I would try my best to get out ahead of the situation. Realizing that Michael was incredibly smart & resourceful, and would eventually find out about my involvement anyway, I think I would take my chances by going to Michael directly, confessing my disloyalty, apologizing profusely, begging his forgiveness, and promising to never do such a thing again.
No guarantees that doing so would have saved Fredo's life. But there's at least a chance that Michael would have respect for Fredo having stood up, taken responsibility for his actions, tried to make it right, and given Michael the courtesy of a direct confession.
Last edited by Questadt; 12/03/13 11:09 AM.
"A lawyer with his briefcase can steal more than a hundred men with guns."
|
|
|
Re: Fredo must die?
[Re: Questadt]
#751384
12/03/13 09:09 PM
12/03/13 09:09 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,697 AZ
Turnbull
|

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,697
AZ
|
I think I would take my chances by going to Michael directly, confessing my disloyalty, apologizing profusely, begging his forgiveness, and promising to never do such a thing again.
No guarantees that doing so would have saved Fredo's life. But there's at least a chance that Michael would have respect for Fredo having stood up, taken responsibility for his actions, tried to make it right, and given Michael the courtesy of a direct confession. I started a thread awhile back: "If Fredo had come clean..." and told Michael about Pentangeli and Questadt voluntarily, and before Michael's perjured testimony. Would Michael have given him a pass? And, would Michael have done anything different in his Senate testimony? I believe Fredo was far more involved with Roth than he let on: http://www.gangsterbb.net/threads/ubbthr...true#Post472494
Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu, E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu... E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
|
|
|
Re: Fredo must die?
[Re: Turnbull]
#751462
12/04/13 11:50 AM
12/04/13 11:50 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 98 New York, NY
Questadt
Button
|
Button
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 98
New York, NY
|
I read the thread, TB. Truly a fascinating deconstruction of means and motives that are not obviously in evidence. You have a genuine talent for circumstantial inference that is well-matched to the Godfather plot line. The Mario Puzo / FFC collaboration produced a plot of impressive sophistication and nuance, especially intriguing being the elements of the story that are merely implied - not stated outright - but are nevertheless essential to a complete understanding of the characters and the various dynamics in play, as you've accurately expounded. You've made a believer out of me. Clearly Fredo must have been into the conspiracy far deeper than meets the naked eye.
"A lawyer with his briefcase can steal more than a hundred men with guns."
|
|
|
Re: Fredo must die?
[Re: Questadt]
#751489
12/04/13 01:15 PM
12/04/13 01:15 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 11,468 With Geary in Fredo's Brothel
dontomasso
Consigliere to the Stars
|
Consigliere to the Stars

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 11,468
With Geary in Fredo's Brothel
|
I read the thread, TB. Truly a fascinating deconstruction of means and motives that are not obviously in evidence. You have a genuine talent for circumstantial inference that is well-matched to the Godfather plot line. The Mario Puzo / FFC collaboration produced a plot of impressive sophistication and nuance, especially intriguing being the elements of the story that are merely implied - not stated outright - but are nevertheless essential to a complete understanding of the characters and the various dynamics in play, as you've accurately expounded. You've made a believer out of me. Clearly Fredo must have been into the conspiracy far deeper than meets the naked eye. Absolutely correct on all counts Q.
"Io sono stanco, sono imbigliato, and I wan't everyone here to know, there ain't gonna be no trouble from me..Don Corleone..Cicc' a port!"
"I stood in the courtroom like a fool."
"I am Constanza: Lord of the idiots."
|
|
|
Re: Fredo must die?
[Re: Sicilian Babe]
#752334
12/08/13 11:12 PM
12/08/13 11:12 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 341
Iceman999
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 341
|
The one thing that really gets me is when Fredo says, "I didn't know it was going to be a hit, Michael."
I mean Fredo was no genius but are we really supposed to believe with him going through what he went through growing alongside Vito that he didn't know what was really going to happen?
Also, that scene where Johnny Ola calls and wakes up Fredo made me think that Roth must have been blackmailing Fredo into taking part in the plot to kill Michael.
Last edited by Iceman999; 12/08/13 11:14 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Fredo must die?
[Re: Sonny_Black]
#752336
12/09/13 12:32 AM
12/09/13 12:32 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 98 New York, NY
Questadt
Button
|
Button
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 98
New York, NY
|
Am I the only one thinking that this was a troll post or a bot? Maybe I'm just being paranoid here. The OP? It's not exactly the most lucid comment I've ever seen posted to an Internet forum. And that's a pretty low bar already.
Last edited by Questadt; 12/09/13 12:33 AM.
"A lawyer with his briefcase can steal more than a hundred men with guns."
|
|
|
Re: Fredo must die?
[Re: Questadt]
#1022982
11/04/21 06:32 PM
11/04/21 06:32 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 13 Union City, Georgia
TedEssco
Word Up
|
Word Up
Wiseguy
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 13
Union City, Georgia
|
At least this one thing should have been clear to Fredo - right from the start of Michael's ascendancy to the donship: That Michael was utterly treacherous and ruthless, and that if Michael ever felt personally threatened, or felt that the family business was in danger, not even the bonds of brotherhood would keep Fredo safe from Michael's wrath.
Under the circumstances, had I been in Fredo's shoes, I would have been quite content to manage a "Mickey Mouse nightclub" - if it meant that I was removed from all the cutthroat machinations of the family business. I'd have taken care of business, patiently worked my way up - and ultimately asked Michael for a 100% legit business of my own, so as to stay entirely clear of all the murder & mayhem.
And if by chance I had been stupid enough to get taken in by Hyman Roth & Johnny Ola, I think I would try my best to get out ahead of the situation. Realizing that Michael was incredibly smart & resourceful, and would eventually find out about my involvement anyway, I think I would take my chances by going to Michael directly, confessing my disloyalty, apologizing profusely, begging his forgiveness, and promising to never do such a thing again.
No guarantees that doing so would have saved Fredo's life. But there's at least a chance that Michael would have respect for Fredo having stood up, taken responsibility for his actions, tried to make it right, and given Michael the courtesy of a direct confession.
That was dope and very good point Quest.
|
|
|
Re: Fredo must die?
[Re: Turnbull]
#1023111
11/06/21 08:07 PM
11/06/21 08:07 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 89 Adelaide, Australia
lucab19
Button
|
Button
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 89
Adelaide, Australia
|
Neri was right outside the room where Fredo had his outburst--he heard it. If Neri thought Michael had gone soft, he could have started having doubts about Michael's toughness--and started plotting his own ascent.
That's the constant danger a Don is in. Everyone's watching him for signs of weakness. Even friends can become foes if they see a weakness. But Neri looked crestfallen when Michael gave him the look after embracing Fredo; I think Neri would not have minded in the least if Fredo had been allowed to live.
|
|
|
|