GangsterBB.NET


Funko Pop! Movies: The Godfather
The Godfather PART II - NEW!

Who's Online Now
1 registered members (RussianCriminalWorld), 426 guests, and 12 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Shout Box
Site Links
>Help Page
>More Smilies
>GBB on Facebook
>Job Saver

>Godfather Website
>Scarface Website
>Mario Puzo Website
NEW!
Active Member Birthdays
No birthdays today
Newest Members
COresearcher, Batman, demonte41, JoeySarcs, legacyaustraliaKG
10381 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
Irishman12 72,993
DE NIRO 45,105
J Geoff 31,333
Hollander 30,011
pizzaboy 23,296
SC 22,902
Turnbull 19,707
Mignon 19,066
Don Cardi 18,238
Sicilian Babe 17,300
plawrence 15,058
Forum Statistics
Forums21
Topics43,379
Posts1,087,162
Members10,381
Most Online1,254
Mar 13th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Michael Kills Sollozzo - Was It Really Personal? #779041
05/19/14 02:58 PM
05/19/14 02:58 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3
F
Fleckman Offline OP
Associate
Fleckman  Offline OP
F
Associate
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3
After Michael outlines his plan to kill Sollozzo and McCluskey to Sonny, he explains that it is strictly business, and not personal.

I think the fact that he wanted to be the triggerman indicates that it was more personal than he let on.

If there was enough time to have the gun placed in the restaurant bathroom, then they could have just as easily had men planted at the restaurant to do the shooting.

Re: Michael Kills Sollozzo - Was It Really Personal? [Re: Fleckman] #779044
05/19/14 03:15 PM
05/19/14 03:15 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 346
North America
Mr. Blonde Offline
Capo
Mr. Blonde  Offline
Capo
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 346
North America
Trouble with that plan is 1) Sol and McCluskey would not have been there had the meeting not taken place, and 2) if you have the meeting under those circumstances, you put Michael in direct danger, which was unacceptable.

To your underlying point, of course it was personal as well as business. If it was *strictly* business, Michael would have never offered, much less insisted, on being the triggerman, even though it was the most effective assassination plan feasible at the time.

Re: Michael Kills Sollozzo - Was It Really Personal? [Re: Mr. Blonde] #779071
05/19/14 04:36 PM
05/19/14 04:36 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 11,468
With Geary in Fredo's Brothel
dontomasso Offline
Consigliere to the Stars
dontomasso  Offline
Consigliere to the Stars

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 11,468
With Geary in Fredo's Brothel
Originally Posted By: Mr. Blonde
Trouble with that plan is 1) Sol and McCluskey would not have been there had the meeting not taken place, and 2) if you have the meeting under those circumstances, you put Michael in direct danger, which was unacceptable.

To your underlying point, of course it was personal as well as business. If it was *strictly* business, Michael would have never offered, much less insisted, on being the triggerman, even though it was the most effective assassination plan feasible at the time.



The only way Solozzo and McCluskey would even be seen in public was at the meeting with Michael, so only he could shoot them. Of course he took what they did personally, but killing Solozzo was stricyly business because as Michael explained, the "key" for Sol was killing Vito. As you may recall Vito told Sol he could do whatever he wanted so long as he did not interfere with the Corleones. Sol decided not to take that advice.


"Io sono stanco, sono imbigliato, and I wan't everyone here to know, there ain't gonna be no trouble from me..Don Corleone..Cicc' a port!"

"I stood in the courtroom like a fool."

"I am Constanza: Lord of the idiots."

Re: Michael Kills Sollozzo - Was It Really Personal? [Re: Fleckman] #779087
05/19/14 05:27 PM
05/19/14 05:27 PM
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,528
L
Lou_Para Offline
Underboss
Lou_Para  Offline
L
Underboss
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,528
I think it was both. Mike knew that he had the best chance to kill Sol and Mac,and that it was the only way to save Vito,(and by extension,the Corleone Family).

But he also would get the chance to kill the guy who sucker punched him.

The necessity of the hit,as outlined by Mike,was strictly business.
Actually putting the bullets in their heads was personal.

Re: Michael Kills Sollozzo - Was It Really Personal? [Re: Lou_Para] #779089
05/19/14 05:47 PM
05/19/14 05:47 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,707
AZ
Turnbull Offline
Turnbull  Offline

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,707
AZ
I agree with Lou.
N.B.:In the novel, Michael said "the sock on the jaw had nothing to do with it." But he also said that everything the Don did was personal, like "knowing each feather that falls off of each sparrow," or something like that.


Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu,
E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu...
E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu
Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.

Moderated by  J Geoff, SC, Turnbull 

Powered by UBB.threads™