Originally posted by Double-J:
These guys deserve to speak, after all, they're the ones laying their lives on the line to fight for Rumsfeld. As one soldier said in the NY Times today, they had a big cavalcade of armored humvees for Rumsfeld, but that's more than he's ever seen for actual in-combat movements.
Is this a case of the troops themselves not supporting the troops? I haven't heard many conservative voices on this one. Finally DJ!
It seems that when I hear: "Support our Troops", it often comes from someone that wants to keep them out there in harms way, while those against the war are "not supporting the troops."
Maybe this twisted logic will finally get untwisted?
