3 registered members (joepuzzles234, m2w, 1 invisible),
1,010
guests, and 12
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics43,336
Posts1,085,986
Members10,381
|
Most Online1,182 1 hour ago
|
|
|
Re: Truth About Modern day Chicago
[Re: IvyLeague]
#875903
02/18/16 10:40 AM
02/18/16 10:40 AM
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 164
slick
Made Member
|
Made Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 164
|
First, one doesn't need to compare all 5 NY families to the Outfit. A comparison with any one of them would make the point. Exception to the rule is your go to when talking about the Outfit huh.lol. The comparison is that with 5 families competing, men have to find other rackets to make money in or be broke. Chicago is one family. Also if you are claiming that all 5 families are more powerful than Chicago, that's laughable, maybe they have more man power but Chicago could go out and make 30 idiots tomorrow and be infested with rats like New York. Power isn't going out and making someone just because he is such and such's second cousin. You forget that the Outfit owns more cops than probably every single New York Family. Probably more than the lower three families put together. Almost every Chicago indictment in the last 30 years has a cop indicted in it or helping the Outfit., some with multiple cops. Also you said that the Outfit had "relatively little involvement in drugs." While I agree with that for the upper echelon, I still think they have more than "relatively little involvement". And finally the Outfit is involved in other rackets, prostitution, real estate scams, police and political corruption, and while the political corruption isn't what it used to be, they still have powerful Chicago politicians in their pockets. As for different types of fraud the Outfit is involved in. Less than a decade ago Sam Galioto was indicted for Medicare Fraud, was just indicted for a real estate related scam. Before that Centracchio was involved in abortion clinics. About 17 years ago Charles Marzano was selling cocaine and laundering the proceeds through the CME.(Chicago Mercantile Exchange) Chicago's "Wall Street".
|
|
|
Re: Truth About Modern day Chicago
[Re: slick]
#875924
02/18/16 03:18 PM
02/18/16 03:18 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,017
SonnyBlackstein
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,017
|
Also if you are claiming that all 5 families are more powerful than Chicago, that's laughable, maybe they have more man power but Chicago could go out and make 30 idiots tomorrow... Chicago would need to make 60 guys 'tomorrow' to be just as large as NYC's smallest. That's a 200% increase to be as big as NYC's bottom family. For the record. And for perspective.
MORGAN: Why didn't you fight him at the park if you wanted to? I'm not goin' now, I'm eatin' my snack. CHUCKIE: Morgan, Let's go. MORGAN: I'm serious Chuckie, I ain't goin'. WILL: So don't go.
|
|
|
Re: Truth About Modern day Chicago
[Re: SonnyBlackstein]
#875962
02/18/16 07:33 PM
02/18/16 07:33 PM
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 164
slick
Made Member
|
Made Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 164
|
Also if you are claiming that all 5 families are more powerful than Chicago, that's laughable, maybe they have more man power but Chicago could go out and make 30 idiots tomorrow... Chicago would need to make 60 guys 'tomorrow' to be just as large as NYC's smallest. That's a 200% increase to be as big as NYC's bottom family. For the record. And for perspective. For the record. And for perspective I could give a **** what you think, I was just throwing a number out. I hope you were also, if not your number is 10 or more higher than it should be, even counting members doing life in prison in both families.
|
|
|
Re: Truth About Modern day Chicago
[Re: slick]
#875996
02/19/16 01:36 AM
02/19/16 01:36 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
IvyLeague
|

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
|
There have been two confirmed making ceremonies in the late eighties: At least three guys in 1988 (Chiaramonti, DiForti, Scarpelli) and Sal Delaurentis at the Como Inn in 1989. They were still doing the ceremony by then because Rocky Infelise expressed surprise that the old ceremony was still in use.
The ceremony was used prior to the eighties as well, although details about it vary. I think you're right about the late 1980s. Thanks for the correction. Exception to the rule is your go to when talking about the Outfit huh.lol.
When talking about the relative few narcotics cases, yes, because that's what they are. And this latest Grand Ave robbery crew bust is no different. The comparison is that with 5 families competing, men have to find other rackets to make money in or be broke. Chicago is one family. New England is one family too. So is what's left of the mob in Detroit. So what's your point? Some have this idea that all the NY guys are tripping all over each other. These people are apparently unaware of just how big the greater NY metro area is. We're talking the 5 NYC boroughs, Long Island, Westchester and northern suburbs, Southwest Connecticut, and North-into-Central New Jersey. This area dwarfs the area in terms of mob territory anywhere else in the country. There's a reason it's always had 5 families - the 5 biggest families - and that's because it's big enough. You can look at the gambling cases alone as a comparison. Those elsewhere in the country, including Chicago, are rather small compared to the ones in NY. Also if you are claiming that all 5 families are more powerful than Chicago, that's laughable, maybe they have more man power but Chicago could go out and make 30 idiots tomorrow and be infested with rats like New York. Power isn't going out and making someone just because he is such and such's second cousin. You talk as if the relatively small numbers in Chicago is all by design. While they have appeared to streamline their operations and downsize in order to have a smaller profile, attrition has been a big part of this. Anyone who thinks otherwise is in denial. People, including myself, were surprised at the most recent estimates by the feds - 25 to 30 members and a little over 100 associates spread across 4 crews at most. You forget that the Outfit owns more cops than probably every single New York Family. Probably more than the lower three families put together. Almost every Chicago indictment in the last 30 years has a cop indicted in it or helping the Outfit., some with multiple cops. Yes, we still see a dirty cop here or there get busted in Outfit cases. But it's certainly not "almost every" Chicago indictment and there's nowhere near the kind of widespread, institutional corruption like there used to be. And you can find similar examples of dirty cops getting busted here and there in NY as well. To argue for Outfit power based on an outdated idea of police influence isn't going to fly. Also you said that the Outfit had "relatively little involvement in drugs." While I agree with that for the upper echelon, I still think they have more than "relatively little involvement". There's no evidence for that. Like I said, the drug cases involving Outfit guys at any level are few and far between. At best comparable to some of the other small families outside NY. And finally the Outfit is involved in other rackets, prostitution, real estate scams, police and political corruption, and while the political corruption isn't what it used to be, they still have powerful Chicago politicians in their pockets. As for different types of fraud the Outfit is involved in. Less than a decade ago Sam Galioto was indicted for Medicare Fraud, was just indicted for a real estate related scam. Before that Centracchio was involved in abortion clinics. About 17 years ago Charles Marzano was selling cocaine and laundering the proceeds through the CME.(Chicago Mercantile Exchange) Chicago's "Wall Street". If you go down the list of Outfit related cases, many of those things you mentioned above are limited, ad-hoc ventures. Nowhere near the scope we saw in NY with the gas tax scam, phone card scam, pump and dump stock scams, real estate scams, telephone cramming and porn site scams, etc. The political and police corruption is also very limited and often based on speculation and innuendo. Ivy you should have learned your lesson with stupid threads like this. I did I hear you. I have mixed feelings at best on it. People think I just live to get into these tired arguments but I dont. But when someone starts a thread with a post about the Outfit that is just chalk full of wrong or outdated info, what are we to do. No offense to the original poster but much of it was stuff we saw said about the Outfit on the forums a decade ago and I thought had been largely refuted. The stuff about made Guy or not in the Chicago outfit. Check out page 155 in "organized crime in Chicago" by lombardo. According to him "there is a definite distinction between being a made guy and being a worker within the Chicago outfit."
Only Bosses and persons of special status within the organization are made guys. Not at all like in NYC, I guess.
Frank the breeze was made as late as 1983 and he was an outfit Guy since the early sixties. It makes more sense if you think of what Lombardo writes. Sounds a lot like NY if you ask me... Affidavit of John J. O'Rourke, former FBI agent and Independent Hearing Officer Laborers Union of North America 15. The FBI maintains an inventory of members and associates of the Chicago Outfit. 16. The FBI defines a "made member" as a person who has participated in a formalized ceremony and has the right to share in the profits of the Chicago Outfit. A made member has the right to run his own street crew; to make loans known as "juice loans"; to extort "street tax" from local businesses and from gamblers and bookmakers; and to otherwise take control of gambling and bookmaking in his area. A made members is also entitled to the respect of other made members. 17. An "associate" of the Outfit is a person who works on behalf of a made member in the day-to-day activities of the Outfit such as collecting interest on juice loans; collecting street tax; contacting bookmakers; and settling debts. Other "associates" of the Outfit do not participate in the day-to-day criminal activities of Organized Crime but help facilitate these activities. 18. The FBI keeps an inventory of individuals who are associates or members of Organized Crime. In order for the FBI to categorize a person as a member or associate of Organized Crime, certain requirements must be met. Generally, those requirements are that two known made members are heard on a wiretap discussing another person as a made member; or that two known made members are heard discussing a third person as a made member, in the presence of an undercover FBI agent; or that two reliable organized crime informants independently identify a person as a made member. http://www.ipsn.org/orourke_affidavit.phpThanks to Snakes from blackhand forum
*=Confirmed position/status
Estimated Administration: Boss: John DiFronzo/86* Acting Boss: Salvatore DeLaurentis/77 Underboss: Salvatore Cataudella/63 Senior Adviser (Consigliere): Marco D'Amico/79
Suspected Territorial Bosses: Frank Caruso/69 - 26th Street* Rudolph Fratto/71 - Elmwood Park James Inendino/72 - Cicero Albert Vena/67 - Grand Avenue*
Suspected Members: Robert Abbinanti/60 Joseph Andriacchi/83 Joseph Calato/65 Michael Caracci/77 Bruno Caruso/71 Leo Caruso/71 Nicholas Cataudella/55 Joseph DiFronzo/81 Peter DiFronzo/82 Robert Dominic/61 Anthony Dote/63 Nicholas Ferriola/40 Gary Gagliano/71 Nicholas Guzzino/74 Rocco Lombardo/75 Michael Magnafichi/53 Michael Marcello/64 Dino Marino/57 Louis Marino/83 John Matassa, Jr./64 Lawrence Pettit/87 Michael Spano, Sr./75 Paul Spano/84 Anthony Spina/61 Christopher Spina/63 Michael Talarico/63 Raymond Tominello/75
Imprisoned Members: Robert Bellavia/76 (05/01/2016) Joseph Lombardo/86 (IP/L) James Marcello/71 (IP/L) Robert Salerno/81 (11/21/2024) Michael Sarno/57 (10/25/2032) Joseph Scalise/77 (05/28/2019)
Suspected Members Who Have Died Since 1998: Donald Angelini (2000) Dominick Basso (2001) Carmine Bastone (2002) Salvatore Bastone (1998) Frank Bonavolante (2002) Dominick Brancato (2005) Frank Buccieri (2004) Eugene Cacciatore (2000) Marshall Caifano (2003) Frank Calabrese, Sr. (2012) Michael Castaldo (2005) Anthony Centracchio (2001) James Cerone (2012) Anthony Chiaramonti (2001) (Murdered) Dominic Cortina (1999) Phillip Cozzo (2015) James Vincent Cozzo (2007) Charles DiCaro (2011) James DiForti (2000) Joseph Grieco (2013) Ernest Rocco Infelise (2005) Angelo LaPietra (1999) Phillip Mesi (2001) William Messino (2002) John Monteleone (2001) Bernard Morgano (2010) Romeo Nappi (2001) Dominick Palermo (2005) Alfred Pilotto (1999) Aldo Piscitelli (2013) Fred Roti (1999) Donald Scalise (2013) Albert Tocco (2005) Alfonso Tornabene (2009) Anthony Zizzo (2006) (Disappeared/Presumed Murdered)
Members Who Have Flipped: Victor Arrigo/Soldier (Dead/Never Testified) Nicholas Calabrese/Soldier Gerald Scarpelli/Soldier (Dead/Suicide/Recanted Testimony) It stands to reason that not all of those guys listed above are made if about 30 members has been the max cited by the FBI in recent years. Also, that administration is largely speculation at this point. I'd wait for more concrete info besides some Internet blogs. Also if you are claiming that all 5 families are more powerful than Chicago, that's laughable, maybe they have more man power but Chicago could go out and make 30 idiots tomorrow... Chicago would need to make 60 guys 'tomorrow' to be just as large as NYC's smallest. That's a 200% increase to be as big as NYC's bottom family. For the record. And for perspective. For the record. And for perspective I could give a **** what you think, I was just throwing a number out. I hope you were also, if not your number is 10 or more higher than it should be, even counting members doing life in prison in both families. Take the Colombo family, which is generally considered to be the smallest family in NY. It is estimated to have about 100 members and approximately 500 associates. I typically don't put a whole lot of stock in associate estimates but, for the sake of comparing apples to apples, look at the estimates for the Outfit. 30 members at most and a little over 100 associates. So, a manpower of something like 600 for the Colombos and perhaps 150 for the Outfit. The smallest NY family being 4 times the size. Those figures for the Outfit are rather similar to estimates for the other remaining small families outside NY, just with the member-to-associate ratio being a little different. In fact you would probably have too add up all the members left not only in Chicago but everywhere else outside the Northeast to come close to the size of the Colombos. Perspective.
Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
|
|
|
Re: Truth About Modern day Chicago
[Re: CabriniGreen]
#876007
02/19/16 05:36 AM
02/19/16 05:36 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
IvyLeague
|

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
|
@ivyleague
chicago still has juice in the damn teamsters union
the difronzo's company did constrution chicago public schools (political corruption)
the grand avenue guys seem to be heavy into narcotics if they're robbing stash houses
the fact that illinois is still crooked will always help the outfit I'm aware of the contacts Difronzo's companies got. You could also bring up the Hired Truck Program. I'm not saying there is no corruption. I'm saying there isn't the kind of widespread, institutionalized corruption that some of you guys seem to be insinuating. The Grand Ave guys targeted stash houses, stealing both money and drugs. Of course they're going to turn around and sell the drugs they've stolen and not just flush them down the toilet. But we're not talking about a crew specifically designed to be in the drug business, ie having an ongoing operation of buying drugs from a supplier and then distributing those drugs to other dealers. These guys were a robbery crew (a much more traditional Outfit venture) who happened to target places where drugs would be. There involvement in narcotics was more of an indirect, ad-hoc nature. What don't we outside of Chicago not understand? You look at that 2004 Stier investigation report and it alleges quite a bit - union members associating with Outfit figures, bid rigging, bribery, banned officials on union payroll, union fund embezzlement, inflated service costs, sham contracts, etc - across several Teamsters locals. But it's interesting how little, if anything, in the way of indictments came as a result of this investigation. Do we believe that the Outfit had the "juice" to stave off indictments from the Justice Department? Or was much of what was in the report more of a residual nature? I'm reminded of that "Mob Lite" article back in 2000 where Howard Abadinsky talks about the more restrained approach the Outfit takes to labor racketeering. And I'm aware of examples people will bring up , such as family members of past Outfit figures being involved in insurance providers that service unions (like Jack Cerone or David Dorfman), the Colis with Local 727, James Glimco with Local 777, and so on. The question is, at what point does much of this stop being labor racketeering activity directly run by and for Outfit interests and begin being more about the descendants of past Outfit figures naturally remaining in unions or related business and operating at various levels of legality? I suppose one could argue this is something of the image you had in mind when you talked about the way the mob in NY should have gone when it came to unions and legitimate business. However, if we're talking about organized crime, by definition there has to be a central hierarchical organization - a mob - at its core. For all the remaining union examples people can bring up, one cannot ignore the fact that the core in Chicago has dwindled considerably to the point where there are little more than two dozen actual members. Once the membership is gone, can one even argue a mob still exists? Sure, Anthony Lapiana made a ton of money selling off his insurance company. He and his blood family are set for life and I imagine he kicked up a good chunk of change to his mob superiors. But none of that changes the overall state of the mob in Detroit. Same thing goes for Chicago above.
Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
|
|
|
Re: Truth About Modern day Chicago
[Re: BlueEyes]
#876019
02/19/16 09:17 AM
02/19/16 09:17 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,408
Snakes
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,408
|
This is a list of the living, *confirmed* made members of the Outfit. These are individuals who have been identified as made by law enforcement sources:
Calabrese, Nicholas (flipped) Caruso, Bruno Caruso, Frank DeLaurentis, Salvatore Fratto, Rudolph Lombardo, Joseph Magnafichi, Michael Marcello, James Matassa, John Jr.
The following are individuals who can be considered made by deductive reasoning, such as holding a leadership position or as a boss of a territory (but only those confirmed by law enforcement sources as holding such):
Andriacchi, Joseph Sarno, Michael Spano, Michael Sr. Vena, Albert
"Snakes... Snakes... I don't know no Snakes."
|
|
|
Re: Truth About Modern day Chicago
[Re: IvyLeague]
#876020
02/19/16 09:56 AM
02/19/16 09:56 AM
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 164
slick
Made Member
|
Made Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 164
|
There have been two confirmed making ceremonies in the late eighties: At least three guys in 1988 (Chiaramonti, DiForti, Scarpelli) and Sal Delaurentis at the Como Inn in 1989. They were still doing the ceremony by then because Rocky Infelise expressed surprise that the old ceremony was still in use.
The ceremony was used prior to the eighties as well, although details about it vary. I think you're right about the late 1980s. Thanks for the correction. Exception to the rule is your go to when talking about the Outfit huh.lol.
When talking about the relative few narcotics cases, yes, because that's what they are. And this latest Grand Ave robbery crew bust is no different. The comparison is that with 5 families competing, men have to find other rackets to make money in or be broke. Chicago is one family. New England is one family too. So is what's left of the mob in Detroit. So what's your point? Some have this idea that all the NY guys are tripping all over each other. These people are apparently unaware of just how big the greater NY metro area is. We're talking the 5 NYC boroughs, Long Island, Westchester and northern suburbs, Southwest Connecticut, and North-into-Central New Jersey. This area dwarfs the area in terms of mob territory anywhere else in the country. There's a reason it's always had 5 families - the 5 biggest families - and that's because it's big enough. You can look at the gambling cases alone as a comparison. Those elsewhere in the country, including Chicago, are rather small compared to the ones in NY. Also if you are claiming that all 5 families are more powerful than Chicago, that's laughable, maybe they have more man power but Chicago could go out and make 30 idiots tomorrow and be infested with rats like New York. Power isn't going out and making someone just because he is such and such's second cousin. You talk as if the relatively small numbers in Chicago is all by design. While they have appeared to streamline their operations and downsize in order to have a smaller profile, attrition has been a big part of this. Anyone who thinks otherwise is in denial. People, including myself, were surprised at the most recent estimates by the feds - 25 to 30 members and a little over 100 associates spread across 4 crews at most. You forget that the Outfit owns more cops than probably every single New York Family. Probably more than the lower three families put together. Almost every Chicago indictment in the last 30 years has a cop indicted in it or helping the Outfit., some with multiple cops. Yes, we still see a dirty cop here or there get busted in Outfit cases. But it's certainly not "almost every" Chicago indictment and there's nowhere near the kind of widespread, institutional corruption like there used to be. And you can find similar examples of dirty cops getting busted here and there in NY as well. To argue for Outfit power based on an outdated idea of police influence isn't going to fly. Also you said that the Outfit had "relatively little involvement in drugs." While I agree with that for the upper echelon, I still think they have more than "relatively little involvement". There's no evidence for that. Like I said, the drug cases involving Outfit guys at any level are few and far between. At best comparable to some of the other small families outside NY. And finally the Outfit is involved in other rackets, prostitution, real estate scams, police and political corruption, and while the political corruption isn't what it used to be, they still have powerful Chicago politicians in their pockets. As for different types of fraud the Outfit is involved in. Less than a decade ago Sam Galioto was indicted for Medicare Fraud, was just indicted for a real estate related scam. Before that Centracchio was involved in abortion clinics. About 17 years ago Charles Marzano was selling cocaine and laundering the proceeds through the CME.(Chicago Mercantile Exchange) Chicago's "Wall Street". If you go down the list of Outfit related cases, many of those things you mentioned above are limited, ad-hoc ventures. Nowhere near the scope we saw in NY with the gas tax scam, phone card scam, pump and dump stock scams, real estate scams, telephone cramming and porn site scams, etc. The political and police corruption is also very limited and often based on speculation and innuendo. Ivy you should have learned your lesson with stupid threads like this. I did I hear you. I have mixed feelings at best on it. People think I just live to get into these tired arguments but I dont. But when someone starts a thread with a post about the Outfit that is just chalk full of wrong or outdated info, what are we to do. No offense to the original poster but much of it was stuff we saw said about the Outfit on the forums a decade ago and I thought had been largely refuted. The stuff about made Guy or not in the Chicago outfit. Check out page 155 in "organized crime in Chicago" by lombardo. According to him "there is a definite distinction between being a made guy and being a worker within the Chicago outfit."
Only Bosses and persons of special status within the organization are made guys. Not at all like in NYC, I guess.
Frank the breeze was made as late as 1983 and he was an outfit Guy since the early sixties. It makes more sense if you think of what Lombardo writes. Sounds a lot like NY if you ask me... Affidavit of John J. O'Rourke, former FBI agent and Independent Hearing Officer Laborers Union of North America 15. The FBI maintains an inventory of members and associates of the Chicago Outfit. 16. The FBI defines a "made member" as a person who has participated in a formalized ceremony and has the right to share in the profits of the Chicago Outfit. A made member has the right to run his own street crew; to make loans known as "juice loans"; to extort "street tax" from local businesses and from gamblers and bookmakers; and to otherwise take control of gambling and bookmaking in his area. A made members is also entitled to the respect of other made members. 17. An "associate" of the Outfit is a person who works on behalf of a made member in the day-to-day activities of the Outfit such as collecting interest on juice loans; collecting street tax; contacting bookmakers; and settling debts. Other "associates" of the Outfit do not participate in the day-to-day criminal activities of Organized Crime but help facilitate these activities. 18. The FBI keeps an inventory of individuals who are associates or members of Organized Crime. In order for the FBI to categorize a person as a member or associate of Organized Crime, certain requirements must be met. Generally, those requirements are that two known made members are heard on a wiretap discussing another person as a made member; or that two known made members are heard discussing a third person as a made member, in the presence of an undercover FBI agent; or that two reliable organized crime informants independently identify a person as a made member. http://www.ipsn.org/orourke_affidavit.phpThanks to Snakes from blackhand forum
*=Confirmed position/status
Estimated Administration: Boss: John DiFronzo/86* Acting Boss: Salvatore DeLaurentis/77 Underboss: Salvatore Cataudella/63 Senior Adviser (Consigliere): Marco D'Amico/79
Suspected Territorial Bosses: Frank Caruso/69 - 26th Street* Rudolph Fratto/71 - Elmwood Park James Inendino/72 - Cicero Albert Vena/67 - Grand Avenue*
Suspected Members: Robert Abbinanti/60 Joseph Andriacchi/83 Joseph Calato/65 Michael Caracci/77 Bruno Caruso/71 Leo Caruso/71 Nicholas Cataudella/55 Joseph DiFronzo/81 Peter DiFronzo/82 Robert Dominic/61 Anthony Dote/63 Nicholas Ferriola/40 Gary Gagliano/71 Nicholas Guzzino/74 Rocco Lombardo/75 Michael Magnafichi/53 Michael Marcello/64 Dino Marino/57 Louis Marino/83 John Matassa, Jr./64 Lawrence Pettit/87 Michael Spano, Sr./75 Paul Spano/84 Anthony Spina/61 Christopher Spina/63 Michael Talarico/63 Raymond Tominello/75
Imprisoned Members: Robert Bellavia/76 (05/01/2016) Joseph Lombardo/86 (IP/L) James Marcello/71 (IP/L) Robert Salerno/81 (11/21/2024) Michael Sarno/57 (10/25/2032) Joseph Scalise/77 (05/28/2019)
Suspected Members Who Have Died Since 1998: Donald Angelini (2000) Dominick Basso (2001) Carmine Bastone (2002) Salvatore Bastone (1998) Frank Bonavolante (2002) Dominick Brancato (2005) Frank Buccieri (2004) Eugene Cacciatore (2000) Marshall Caifano (2003) Frank Calabrese, Sr. (2012) Michael Castaldo (2005) Anthony Centracchio (2001) James Cerone (2012) Anthony Chiaramonti (2001) (Murdered) Dominic Cortina (1999) Phillip Cozzo (2015) James Vincent Cozzo (2007) Charles DiCaro (2011) James DiForti (2000) Joseph Grieco (2013) Ernest Rocco Infelise (2005) Angelo LaPietra (1999) Phillip Mesi (2001) William Messino (2002) John Monteleone (2001) Bernard Morgano (2010) Romeo Nappi (2001) Dominick Palermo (2005) Alfred Pilotto (1999) Aldo Piscitelli (2013) Fred Roti (1999) Donald Scalise (2013) Albert Tocco (2005) Alfonso Tornabene (2009) Anthony Zizzo (2006) (Disappeared/Presumed Murdered)
Members Who Have Flipped: Victor Arrigo/Soldier (Dead/Never Testified) Nicholas Calabrese/Soldier Gerald Scarpelli/Soldier (Dead/Suicide/Recanted Testimony) It stands to reason that not all of those guys listed above are made if about 30 members has been the max cited by the FBI in recent years. Also, that administration is largely speculation at this point. I'd wait for more concrete info besides some Internet blogs. Also if you are claiming that all 5 families are more powerful than Chicago, that's laughable, maybe they have more man power but Chicago could go out and make 30 idiots tomorrow... Chicago would need to make 60 guys 'tomorrow' to be just as large as NYC's smallest. That's a 200% increase to be as big as NYC's bottom family. For the record. And for perspective. For the record. And for perspective I could give a **** what you think, I was just throwing a number out. I hope you were also, if not your number is 10 or more higher than it should be, even counting members doing life in prison in both families. Take the Colombo family, which is generally considered to be the smallest family in NY. It is estimated to have about 100 members and approximately 500 associates. I typically don't put a whole lot of stock in associate estimates but, for the sake of comparing apples to apples, look at the estimates for the Outfit. 30 members at most and a little over 100 associates. So, a manpower of something like 600 for the Colombos and perhaps 150 for the Outfit. The smallest NY family being 4 times the size. Those figures for the Outfit are rather similar to estimates for the other remaining small families outside NY, just with the member-to-associate ratio being a little different. In fact you would probably have too add up all the members left not only in Chicago but everywhere else outside the Northeast to come close to the size of the Colombos. Perspective. Every Chicago case ad-hoc, Check. Too funny, like I said before, in New York they have to give a lot more people a taste of everything. In Chicago they only involve who they need to because they are not the size of New York. Spano,Sarno,Family Secrets, and the Panozzo crew had real police gear including badges, now they could have stole them out of a house but I doubt they where given the OK to rob a cops house.
|
|
|
Re: Truth About Modern day Chicago
[Re: ralphie_cifaretto]
#876028
02/19/16 11:36 AM
02/19/16 11:36 AM
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 164
slick
Made Member
|
Made Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 164
|
There isn't much left of the old Chicago crew. There are guys still around, but it's a complete joke compared to what it once was.
And yes, there are a few millionaires still around, but that doesn't mean the family is strong. Same thing with Detroit. I could go into more details, but Ivy has pretty much said it all. Please share your infinite wisdom. With all these great details about how the Outfit is the same as Detroit. I think even Ivy agrees you are wrong there.
|
|
|
Re: Truth About Modern day Chicago
[Re: ralphie_cifaretto]
#876043
02/19/16 01:38 PM
02/19/16 01:38 PM
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 164
slick
Made Member
|
Made Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 164
|
There isn't much left of the old Chicago crew. There are guys still around, but it's a complete joke compared to what it once was.
And yes, there are a few millionaires still around, but that doesn't mean the family is strong. Same thing with Detroit. I could go into more details, but Ivy has pretty much said it all. Please share your infinite wisdom. With all these great details about how the Outfit is the same as Detroit. I think even Ivy agrees you are wrong there. I never said those families were the same. What I'm saying is both of those families aren't strong. Even the weakest NY family is stronger than Chicago. Sure you didn't. I take it you think Boston and Philly are stronger also?
Last edited by slick; 02/19/16 01:42 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Truth About Modern day Chicago
[Re: BlueEyes]
#876052
02/19/16 03:05 PM
02/19/16 03:05 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 904
ChiTown
WestTown
|
WestTown
Underboss
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 904
|
lol "times have truly changed." Well of course they have? Who are you Yogi Berra?
I personally don't think Chicago makes anyone anymore. Why would they? If being made was created to assert status on the street, but you don't want anyone to know your status anymore, what in the fuck is the point?
Chicago guys have never referred to it as "the family." It was always "the business" or "the racket." It's always been about money and while there was definitely a pecking order, Chicago was never like other cities.
Consider that Mikey Davis just went to prison because he extended a juice loan to the nephew of Melrose Park's Mayor. Consider Emil Schullo's son becoming the Chief of the Cicero Police while his fucking father was still in jail. When Emil got out, he was invited to all of the Cicero Police ceremonies by that fat fuck Mayor Larry Dominick, who married the nice of Augie Taddeo. Dominick's two campaign managers, Vince Iaccino and Joe Calomino are relatives of the Buccieri family. Consider the photos I used to post of Fat Carl Dote welcoming the Des Plaines alderman at his new restaurant. Consider that it came out in 2007 that State Senator Jimmy DeLeo was doing business deals with the Spilotro's. To this day, Solly D hosts the Island Lake PD at his lakehouse barbeques. Loose connections? Sure. But use common sense.
For those who consider the mob a "perfect science" with absolute verifications, you really need lessons in common sense and how to excercise it.
Last edited by ChiTown; 02/19/16 03:10 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Truth About Modern day Chicago
[Re: Snakes]
#876069
02/19/16 08:31 PM
02/19/16 08:31 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
IvyLeague
|

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
|
Every Chicago case ad-hoc, Check. Too funny, like I said before, in New York they have to give a lot more people a taste of everything. In Chicago they only involve who they need to because they are not the size of New York. Spano,Sarno,Family Secrets, and the Panozzo crew had real police gear including badges, now they could have stole them out of a house but I doubt they where given the OK to rob a cops house. I didn't say everything with Chicago is ad-hoc. But I'm talking about the overall state of the Outfit so I'm looking at overall trends. And going by your "the Outfit has all of Chicago to itself" thinking, one could argue the handful of guys left in LA must really be rolling in the money. That's a huge territory and there's only a few of them. If you are talking about number of made men in the weakest New York family then your right. If you are talking about the actual power in the city they live in you are wrong. I don't see anyone in the upper echelon of the Outfit living in trailers and their wives on food stamps. Numbers don't always equal power. I don't underestimate New York like you do Chicago. New York has a huge numbers, and that helps with muscle but it also leads to more rats and longer sentences,and turnover in members. Is the Outfit huge, no not by any means, but its bigger than you are giving it credit for. Not to mention in Chicago almost anyone in politics is corruptible. That goes for a lot of police in the suburbs also. Bigger than who is giving it credit for? We have the most recent estimates by the feds, which nobody here is on a position to argue with. Even if you want to differentiate when it comes to the importance of made guys in Chicago, whether they're still making members, etc, all you have to do is add the members and associates to get an overall picture of the Outfit's size and manpower. 25-30 members and a little over 100 associates. So perhaps 150 or so. Once again, to put that in perspective, that's similar to the other small families remaining outside NY. Numbers can very much equal power. Would anyone argue there's no difference between a 200 member family and a 20 members family. Even more so, numbers provide durability and longevity. Carlos Marcello may have been very powerful in his day but where is the New Orleans mob now? Gone. And it's because they didn't have the numbers. Also, we should be looking at overall trends and not one Colombo guy to make a point. I'm not bringing up Magnafichi being caught shoplifting four times in recent years. The political corruption in Chicago is so deep-rooted and ingrained with bloodlines and nepotism it will take years and years to dilute it.
When other posters say that Chicago "isn't like" the other LCN groups they are telling the truth. Think about Frank Schweihs, a German-Italian who basically ran the Grand Avenue crew on the street after Louie Eboli died and told other made guys (Mike Glitta) to "fuck themselves". Albeit on behalf of Joey Lombardo but I can't imagine that happening anywhere else but Chicago. In that sense, yes, it is very different than the other families. I agree that there is still a lot of corruption in Chicago. It just doesn't all revolve around or is even connected to the mob like some seem to insinuate. Also, while one can find certain unique things about the Outfit, there are more that make Chicago similar to other mob families. Much of what made it different is in the past. Sometimes I think people exaggerate the differences in order to judge Chicago by another set of criteria in order to make it look stronger than it is.
Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
|
|
|
Re: Truth About Modern day Chicago
[Re: BlueEyes]
#876076
02/19/16 10:05 PM
02/19/16 10:05 PM
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 164
slick
Made Member
|
Made Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 164
|
Bigger than who is giving it credit for? We have the most recent estimates by the feds, which nobody here is on a position to argue with. Even if you want to differentiate when it comes to the importance of made guys in Chicago, whether they're still making members, etc, all you have to do is add the members and associates to get an overall picture of the Outfit's size and manpower. 25-30 members and a little over 100 associates. So perhaps 150 or so. Once again, to put that in perspective, that's similar to the other small families remaining outside NY.
[quote]Numbers can very much equal power. Would anyone argue there's no difference between a 200 member family and a 20 members family. Even more so, numbers provide durability and longevity. Carlos Marcello may have been very powerful in his day but where is the New Orleans mob now? Gone. And it's because they didn't have the numbers.
Also, we should be looking at overall trends and not one Colombo guy to make a point. I'm not bringing up Magnafichi being caught shoplifting four times in recent years.
Bigger than Ralph was thinking is what I was talking about. Go ahead and bring up Mags he got booted out of the Outfit more than a decade ago. We can agree to disagree. That's fine with me. Also the most recent quote from the Feds was from 08' there could be more or less members we don't have a clue. When was the last time the feds put out an estimate of each New York family? I have no doubt you have to have more men in New York to survive or compete, especially because of the size of the Gambino's and Genovese. I also am not saying that the Outfit took the right position by keeping smaller numbers of soldiers/not necessarily made. But they did it on purpose, just like they could one day decide to expand, not that I'm saying they are going to. There were claims that Marcello and Sarno both held making ceremony's. But who knows. You are right it was definitely not a smart move for Marcello to keep New Orleans small, but I believe part of that was the Italian population in N.O. dwindled. Chicago still has plenty of Italians, and younger guys they could bring in to the fold at anytime, and no I'm not saying they would make 200 men. You bring up 200 made men and I can tell you right now there are only two families close to or at that, and the Colombo's only have about 90 give or take 5 or 10 and about 20 are in jail and 11 or so are doing life. That's a far shot from 200. But I like how the numbers talk was about the difference between the Outfit and the weakest family, and you come up with 200 vs 20 for your example. Too funny we could do this forever. (and I know you were not referencing the smallest family in NY at 200.) Comparing LA with 4 guys total left to the Outfit that you claim has 150 left is funny. Your a funny guy. And there is a lot of political corruption but the Outfit isn't involved at all. Not only funny he is an insider to.
|
|
|
|