http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news...hackers-w455528

All this after leaked emails showed she colluded with the democratic party's top brass to fuck over Bernie Sanders.

And this disgusting pig is talking about democracy being undermined.

What a hypocrite.

Under President Obama and Secretaries of State Hillary Clinton and John Kerry the USA has interfered with Israel's election and try to prevent Benjamin Netanyahu from winning an election, bombed Libya and helped overthrow its leader, supported the terrorist organization Muslim Brotherhood to take over Egypt; bombed Syria, tried to overthrow its leader and supported jihadists terrorists as long as they were against Assad, and bombed and took part in the war in Yemen. Who knows how many countries the USA has hacked. And that's far from everything, yet those who supported and continue to support Obama and Clinton have had almost nothing to say about it. Yet those same supporters are outraged that some Russians who may or may not be connected to the Kremlin hacked Clinton-related emails that gave proof of corruption. Yes, hypocrisy fits better than any other word to describe this faux outrage.

More importantly, when i clicked on the link i saw another story. Apparently, prince harry is having a secret romance. I have to keep my interest in world affairs in strict priority order.

Hillary Clinton talks about rigging Palestinian elections.



Enjoy, Oak.

Donald Trump just appointed an oil executive to secretary of state. This is not an Onion headline. It's real.

http://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/arti...te-10792412.php

No, that would have been when Hillary was appointed Secretary of State.

Tensions between Donald and GOP heating up. There could be a civil war within the Republican party before the (tentative?) inauguration.

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-russia-20161212-story.html

"Republican Party leaders have strenuously denied that their computer systems were hacked. If they were, the fact that no GOP files were released would suggest Russia had decided to avoid disclosures that might embarrass the GOP, and raise suspicions that Moscow has stockpiled Republican files that might be used later in an effort to influence Trump."



Yeah, that's it. *rolls eyes*

Just look at the picture of the person who wrote the article.

Do you honestly expect a dyke librarian hippy who probably hasn't got laid since Nixon was in office to write an impartial article about Trump?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016...bil-chief-putin



Condo represent!

Condoleezza "Mushroom Cloud" Rice, who swore Iraq had nuclear weapons. She's lucky she's not in prison with the rest of the Bush administration.

And, even more good could come out of the hacking probe. A return to a culture of bipartisan oversight in congress.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/pol...pe=sectionfront

That didn't last long...


Fierce fighting halts Aleppo evacuation
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-38314291

had a feeling this was going to happen every time they try and do any sort of negation someones breaks it these things never last more than a couple of days and its the innocents who suffer

US and Russia agreement to bomb ISIS together even broke down after a week after the US "accidently" hit the Syrian Army killing 60 soldiers

[quote=OakAsFan]Condoleezza "Mushroom Cloud" Rice, who swore Iraq had nuclear weapons. She's lucky she's not in prison with the rest of the Bush administration. [/quot

I think Powell made that case not her. He became an obama guy so he would make the case about anyone. Didn't he make the case that obama was a Muslim not a Christian.

I guess he was right about that why else would he bring at least 10 thousand Muslims here and only 55 Christians who even the good muslems have been killing left and right.

The good Muslims also enjoy killing the gays as well. So you better watch out for them.

Two hours? What took them so long?


Jury Finds Dylann Roof Guilty In S.C. Church Shooting


http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2...church-shooting

You called it. Two recent hoaxes uncovered.

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/musl...ticle-1.2910944

Young Muslim woman makes up story of being attacked to cover her tracks for missing curfew.



http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/fi...ticle-1.2903176

Fireman set fire to his OWN house and tried to pin it on BLM activists.

We were warned the GOP's "libertarian" branding in the past 8 years was nothing more than a strategy.

https://twitter.com/matthewstoller/status/809572870452080640

http://www.nydailynews.com/trump-working-class-hero-ceo-best-friend-article-1.2912100

Wanting a black woman in prison? That's racist Oak. You can't criticize her just like you can't Obama. Or how does that work in the liberal mindset?

Wouldn't classify it as "branding". I would say it's more "stating the facts".

I have some understanding about why the girl lied. She's scared to death of her father. Even here in the U.S., Muslim fathers have killed daughters who get out of control or who date outside of their religion. Look at her in court. She's 18 years old, a legal adult, but she submitted to her father shaving all of her hair off. To make it clear to everyone else, I'm not saying that her hoax was okay, just that I understand where she's coming from.

As for the firefighter, he may be a racist and it backfired. If that's the case I'm sure he'll get what's coming to him.

Trump never claimed to be a libertarian, so whatever point you're trying to make bombed on impact.

It's always the very people the articles describe who try the hardest to discredit them.

German-Iraqi boy, 12, 'tried to bomb Christmas market'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-38343124

Yeah I don't get it. Nobody ever thought Trump is libertarian. Nobody really even considers the GOP libertarian either. The libertarian party itself isn't even very libertarian.

lol. Again, it's very fitting that the people the article talks about are the very people that "don't get it".

That makes no sense. The article basically talks about how Trump's economic policies aren't very free market or libertarian. How does this describe people like me?