Quote:
Originally posted by Irishman12:
Crash ***

A very good movie that exceeded my expectations very much. A lot of comedy that I wasn't expecting but definintely made the movie more enjoyable. To inform the elitist who desperately need to know what I think about the movie "the camera movement was good. The character depth was good. The acting was good. The script was good. The music was good and used at the appropiate time. The directing was good. The positioning of the camera was good. The pace of the movie was good. The boxart was good. The special features lacked." And to answer the ever famous question 'why' because I said so!
Irish, you're being a mixture of too hard on yourself and too "me against the world"ish, I think.

My thoughts on Crash, not to antagonise you in any way, but to give a different light on the proceedings. Neither a personal attack (not that I expect you'd take it as one) or an elitist's opinion; but one to perhaps get you thinking about your own opinion a bit more and to open you to a different approach:

Crash **
2005, Haggis, Ger/US/Australia

Several people are connected by racially involved incidents over the course of two days in LA.
A film not without its explosive moments of potential, but for a melodrama full of dramatic irony and overkill, the final impression is dubious: an ambitious directorial debut effort, and yet it seems to offer no further insight into racism than what we already know.

Thanks for reading,
Mick


...dot com bold typeface rhetoric.
You go clickety click and get your head split.
'The hell you look like on a message board
Discussing whether or not the Brother is hardcore?