3 registered members (Ciment, joepuzzles234, 1 invisible),
1,077
guests, and 33
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics43,337
Posts1,085,999
Members10,381
|
Most Online1,245 1 hour ago
|
|
|
Re: Angelo Bruno- well loved but who was loyal?
[Re: furio_from_naples]
#889067
07/31/16 01:39 AM
07/31/16 01:39 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 2,697 n.e.philly
hoodlum
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 2,697
n.e.philly
|
Bruno's protector was Carlo Gambino. The Genovese would have never made that move. The gambinos and genoveses wanted that Atlantic City as an open city after the casinos become legal. Even if Don Carlo would be alive Bruno would die because the money go first the friendship. No furio, I believe that if carlo remained alive ,he would have guided bruno into a more open minded way of thinking,,that (MY BROTHER ANGELO..THERE IS PLENTY OF WATER FOR OUR OTHER FRIENDS TO WET OUR BEAKS..WON'T YOU PLEASE SEE IT OUR WAY SO WE WON'T ALL STARVE.& THERE IS PLENTY OF LIQUID FOR U TO HAVE A SENIORITY INGROUND POOL..WE GO BACK A LONG WAYS MY CUMPARE..LET'S SPARE US THE TROUBLE OF EMBARRASSMENT & ALL REMAIN "FRIENDS".....
I didn't want to leave blood on your carpet...
|
|
|
Re: Angelo Bruno- well loved but who was loyal?
[Re: Tonytough]
#889071
07/31/16 02:51 AM
07/31/16 02:51 AM
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,679 Chicago
CabriniGreen
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,679
Chicago
|
@Ted
True, but one could also argue that the only reason Tieri was successful was Bruno didn't keep the guys in his family happy enough, giving Tieri the opening..
THAT was Bruno's fault....
@ Furio
I think hoodlum is right, if Carlo was alive, the Gambinos woulda got all of AC, giving up a taste to BRUNO SPECIFICALLY' probably at the expense of the other soldiers, kinda like the Cherry Hill Gambino deal. If a family like the Genovese woulda made a stink, it goes to the table and basically goes like this; Bruno says' "It's my territory, I gave Carlo permission to operate", the Genovese object, they say okay let's vote. The other bosses back Carlo, thus they back Bruno. The Genovese ( probably Tieri) are seething silently, plotting, lol
|
|
|
Re: Angelo Bruno- well loved but who was loyal?
[Re: Tonytough]
#889160
08/01/16 12:14 PM
08/01/16 12:14 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 865 Uk
Tonytough
OP
ba da bing
|
OP
ba da bing
Underboss
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 865
Uk
|
|
|
|
Re: Angelo Bruno- well loved but who was loyal?
[Re: Tonytough]
#889162
08/01/16 12:25 PM
08/01/16 12:25 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 30 CA
joeydoves
Wiseguy
|
Wiseguy
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 30
CA
|
Old school cosa nostra wiseguy he didnt talk at all, a real wiseguy but crazy ass hell
Get da fuck outta hearr
|
|
|
Re: Angelo Bruno- well loved but who was loyal?
[Re: hoodlum]
#917456
07/24/17 11:32 PM
07/24/17 11:32 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 8 oakland, ca
dannygreene
Associate
|
Associate
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 8
oakland, ca
|
U really are a funny guy, hehehehe either would of went to war over it, did he let them wet there beak i wonder
chain snatching jive ass maricon mufackas
|
|
|
Re: Angelo Bruno- well loved but who was loyal?
[Re: Serpiente]
#917477
07/26/17 12:42 PM
07/26/17 12:42 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,710
BillyBrizzi
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,710
|
Bruno was loved by the masses and Philly but held his boys back for the good of the family and his pocket.Bruno was concerned about the attention that the casinos would have on crime. He was happy not having to deal with all that .(other then union)
The state was all over Philly mob by this point so you had the state offices and the Casino Control Commission, then you had the Feds, and the internal revenue service all with there hand out Bruno knew this and was fine with other families with there hand in the pot that would drawl attention from his family.
He wanted local 54 all to himself and all those little things like that stopped his guys from becoming rich or earning .
The ones that were rich in the family were already rich or had a monopoly on his racket and Bruno was at the top of that also.
No doubt with his close confidant Gambino out he was done !!!! The best thing he could've done was retire at the end of the 70's and have a peaceful transition of power to Phil Testa, don't you agree Serp? He had all the money in the world and he should have seen the many writings on the wall, like you said the FBI were starting to get all over LCN and his protector Gambino was dead and rank and file were unhappy. Plus he had the right age to take a step back and enjoy his grandchildren and stuff..
Last edited by BillyBrizzi; 07/26/17 12:43 PM.
FORTIS FORTUNA IUVAT
|
|
|
Re: Angelo Bruno- well loved but who was loyal?
[Re: BillyBrizzi]
#917491
07/26/17 04:30 PM
07/26/17 04:30 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 2,697 n.e.philly
hoodlum
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 2,697
n.e.philly
|
Carlo dies in what 76 ? He was very tight with Big Paul, I read somewhere that they dined together a lot and that Philly would proxy their commission votes through the Gambino's so Paul had two votes to start every meeting. True, that is why the Genovese family started all those intrigues. They wanted that Philly proxy vote so they would have the upper hand in the Commission. We have to remember that all this was quite some time before 1985, when the Commission still had tremendous power. Also ironic is how towards the end of Bruno's tenure,P.Testa & Nicky Sr. started siding more & more w/ Bobby Manna even though scarfo was since way back..they were both having discretions w/ Bruno ,even provoking Bruno to ask Nicky 2 side w/him..I'm certain they knew the hammer was dropping & from where, maybe not Phil ,but surely nicky..IMO.
I didn't want to leave blood on your carpet...
|
|
|
Re: Angelo Bruno- well loved but who was loyal?
[Re: BillyBrizzi]
#917493
07/26/17 04:48 PM
07/26/17 04:48 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 305
Stubbs
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 305
|
Bruno was loved by the masses and Philly but held his boys back for the good of the family and his pocket.Bruno was concerned about the attention that the casinos would have on crime. He was happy not having to deal with all that .(other then union)
The state was all over Philly mob by this point so you had the state offices and the Casino Control Commission, then you had the Feds, and the internal revenue service all with there hand out Bruno knew this and was fine with other families with there hand in the pot that would drawl attention from his family.
He wanted local 54 all to himself and all those little things like that stopped his guys from becoming rich or earning .
The ones that were rich in the family were already rich or had a monopoly on his racket and Bruno was at the top of that also.
No doubt with his close confidant Gambino out he was done !!!! The best thing he could've done was retire at the end of the 70's and have a peaceful transition of power to Phil Testa, don't you agree Serp? He had all the money in the world and he should have seen the many writings on the wall, like you said the FBI were starting to get all over LCN and his protector Gambino was dead and rank and file were unhappy. Plus he had the right age to take a step back and enjoy his grandchildren and stuff.. Up until the eighties, things were very stable for bosses. I mean, Galante obviously had it coming, but who would've thought back then that Bruno or Castellano could've been clipped? And by rivals within their own families at that? As others have said, Bruno was in tight with the Gambinos, so who could've seen that Castellano couldn't have protected him? Bruno was obviously weak, but Castellano was super powerful and was respected by Gigante and Fat Tony. It makes me wonder if Gigante approved of the hit on Bruno, if it was Funzi by himself plotting or all of the West Side was on board. If the whole West Side was behind it, maybe they didnt think Big Paul was smart enough to figure it out or strong enough to do anything about it. Anyway, just thinking out loud.
"It wasn't very good parsley to begin with, and then the cat went and peed on it." -Sicilian proverb
|
|
|
Re: Angelo Bruno- well loved but who was loyal?
[Re: PHL_Mob]
#917556
07/27/17 05:14 PM
07/27/17 05:14 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,788
Dwalin2011
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,788
|
That's from the 1984 documentary "Crime Inc", the 1st episode. It's a little funny to hear though, when the narrator says "Perhaps Bruno was killed because he opposed drugs. Perhaps younger men simply wanted to take over". "YOUNGER"....Tieri was not only older than Bruno, he was in a worse health shape even, since he died only a year after the hit. And Caponigro was younger...By 2 years, really a HUGE difference  A "generational conflict"! They didn't know yet who killed him when the documentary was made though, but still, now when it's known, defining Tieri as a "younger man" compared to Bruno, when he even had to attend his RICO trial in a wheelchair with an oxygen tank....He barely made it in time to authorize the hit, but could never enjoy the profit he could get out of it...
Willie Marfeo to Henry Tameleo:
1) "You people want a loaf of bread and you throw the crumbs back. Well, fuck you. I ain't closing down."
2) "Get out of here, old man. Go tell Raymond to go shit in his hat. We're not giving you anything."
|
|
|
|