1 registered members (m2w),
1,000
guests, and 29
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics43,337
Posts1,086,004
Members10,381
|
Most Online1,245
|
|
|
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion
#94027
06/19/06 01:05 PM
06/19/06 01:05 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,210
DonVitoCorleone
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,210
|
Originally posted by long_lost_corleone: [quote]Originally posted by DonVitoCorleone: [b] [quote]Originally posted by long_lost_corleone: [b] quote: Originally posted by DonVitoCorleone: quote: Originally posted by ronnierocketAGO: Glad you dug it dude. It was my third time seeing it, just to clarify.  [/b][/quote]That's it? Newb. We've already been into this. I hold the record for "most viewings after school when I was 12, in a three month period". *brags* [/b][/quote]Well...uh...yer...uh...yer GAY. OUT OF THE CLOSETS AND INTO THE STREETS! OUT OF THE CLOSETS AND INTO THE STREETS! OUT OF THE CLOSETS AND INTO THE STREETS! GOD HATES QUEERS! GOD HATES QUEERS!
GOD MADE ADAM AND EVE NOT ADAM AND STEVE!
I dig farmers don't shoot me please!
|
|
|
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion
#94029
06/19/06 10:45 PM
06/19/06 10:45 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,246
MistaMista Tom Hagen
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,246
|
The Age of Innocence 1993/Scorsese
Viewing this film was an interesting expierience because of how accustomed and familiar I've become with Scorsese's style from the early 90's due to my multiplie viewings of Goodfellas and Casino. This film provided a complex mash-up of certain directorial elements of both of those films, as well as a few new techniques. Cape Fear also holds certain characteristics of these early 90's Scorsese flicks, and after finally seeing The Age of Innocence, I've come to regard 1990 - 1995 as a bit of Scorsese golden age. I've yet to see the two films that preceded and followed this 5 year time period (The Last Temptation of Christ and Kundun), so hopefully I can get to those soon.
As for The Age of Innocence itself, Scorsese's flawless use of a nearly constantly moving camera is stunning. I also enjoyed his liberal yet unique use of the fade technique, which is especially evident in the first half of the film. Also, his choice to use an unidentified narrator (unless I missed something in the beginning) was intriguing. With his quadrilogy of early 90's films, I feel like Scorsese really set the precedent for the coming years and showed everyone what can really be done with modern cinematic technology.
Daniel Day Lewis's talent is obvious here, but even more so when considering his other Scorsese performance in Gangs of New York. The interesting thing is that while both films share a similar setting and time period, Day Lewis plays drastically different characters, showing his range. I personally enjoyed both he and Scorsese's work here much more than in Gangs.
One specific element I particularly enjoyed here was the brief glimpses the viewers got into Daniel Day Lewis's character's subconcious thoughts. The nostalgic fantasy sequence right near the end was one of the best expressions of rememberance and regret I've ever seen on the screen. Scorsese's continuing choice of main characters who are members of a society from which they feel ultimately alienated fascinates me as well.
Overall, despite the long line of critically acclaimed films I've seen recently, this is one of the first ones to really jump out at me, invigorate my creative processes, and really just get me excited about watching movies again. This film absolutely reaffirms Scorsese as my favorite director. I was thinking afterwards and after a little research I realized that this was my 10th Scorsese film, tying the most I've seen from any one director. I'm really looking forward to eventually getting to The King of Comedy, The Last Temptation of Christ, and Kundun, as well as rewatches for a couple more of his. And I can't fucking wait for The Departed.
4.5/5 Stars
I dream in widescreen.
|
|
|
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion
#94036
06/20/06 02:27 PM
06/20/06 02:27 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,246
MistaMista Tom Hagen
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,246
|
Anyone seen either of these? If so, any thoughts? Safe 1995/Haynes To Sleep with Anger 1990/Burnett
I dream in widescreen.
|
|
|
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion
#94040
06/22/06 11:10 AM
06/22/06 11:10 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,543 Gateshead, UK
Capo de La Cosa Nostra
|

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,543
Gateshead, UK
|
Waiting for Godot  Michael Lindsay-Hogg 2000 Ireland (1st time; DVD) Two tramps question their existence while waiting by a road for Godot, who never shows. Beckett's play has been interpreted as a religious allegory, though his preoccupations with form merit discussion of Godot as the narrative convention the two characters wait for. In the meantime, its hollow ponderings, quite ingenious in the play, are horribly transferred to film: badly shot, and the sound is terrible.Not I Neil Jordan 2000 Ireland (1st time; DVD) A mouth spits out a monologue about nothing in particular. One of the few adaptations in the "Beckett on Film" series that feels specifically suited to film, and not simply a filmed play, this is shot entirely in close-ups of Julianne Moore's mouth, delivering Beckett's original monologue with mounting despair. It's brilliant stuff; fourteen minutes of speech, to the point where the words don't look like they're coming from the mouth anymore, but have become abstract, almost detached from one another. Only the opening shot, which contextualises what we're about to see, detracts.Ohio Impromptu Charles Sturridge 2000 UK (1st time; DVD) A man reads from a book to a listener, who happens to be the same person. Cinematic in-joke: Jeremy Irons plays the dead ringers here, one of whom talks the whole time, the other simply knocking on the table. If it tries for a tragic tone, it doesn't quite succeed, though there are pleasures to be found in the camera trickery--though most of the time, admittedly, there's no need for it, with match-cutting detaching us from what could have been a far more intimate adaptation.Rough for Theatre I Kieron J. Walsh 2000 Ireland (1st time; DVD) A and B, two tramps who may or may not be the last people on earth, struggle to get on. The problem with this anthology is most evident here; the directors simply aren't good enough, and although this short has one of the more authentic settings of the Beckett adaptations, the actors are far too animated, far too humane, far too recognisable, to evoke the playwright's abstraction.36 Quai des Orfèvres / 36  Olivier Marchal 2004 France (1st time; big screen) Two rival cops try to nab a gang of thieves before the other, in order to get the top job in the service. Both are bent, but one is dirtier than the other. So entrenched in seediness is this thriller, so determined to establish a world of rotten cops, that the ridiculous narrative arc, the mounting body count, and the convenient twists of injustice can't help but entertain. Depardieu and Auteuil, France's two best-known actors, go head-to-head in a battle reminiscent of Mann's Heat (1995), and the gusto with which both performances are captured drives this film along satisfactorily to its predictable climax. A dark, loud film void of the emotion it strives for, which ultimately turns out to be as black-and-white as it doesn't want to be.
...dot com bold typeface rhetoric. You go clickety click and get your head split. 'The hell you look like on a message board Discussing whether or not the Brother is hardcore?
|
|
|
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion
#94049
06/23/06 11:54 AM
06/23/06 11:54 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,210
DonVitoCorleone
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,210
|
Originally posted by MistaMista Tom Hagen: Probably the most stunningly beautiful cinematic depiction of insanity and mental deterioration ever made. For me, that title belongs to Aguirre, Wrath of God.
I dig farmers don't shoot me please!
|
|
|
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion
#94051
06/23/06 12:35 PM
06/23/06 12:35 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512 Right here, but I'd rather be ...
long_lost_corleone
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,512
Right here, but I'd rather be ...
|
Originally posted by DonVitoCorleone: [quote]Originally posted by MistaMista Tom Hagen: [b]Probably the most stunningly beautiful cinematic depiction of insanity and mental deterioration ever made. For me, that title belongs to Aguirre, Wrath of God. [/b][/quote]And not Taxi Driver? I think that's it for me. But, I don't know, I have a strange interest in mental health, or the lack of it, more so. So, I watch far too many movies dealing with the subject to pull a "best" one out of my ass on a wimb.
"Somebody told me when the bomb hits, everybody in a two mile radius will be instantly sublimated, but if you lay face down on the ground for some time, avoiding the residual ripples of heat, you might survive, permanently fucked up and twisted like you're always underwater refracted. But if you do go gas, there's nothing you can do if the air that was once you is mingled and mashed with the kicked up molecules of the enemy's former body. Big-kid-tested, motherf--ker approved."
|
|
|
Re: Movies You Just Watched Discussion
#94055
06/23/06 04:44 PM
06/23/06 04:44 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,246
MistaMista Tom Hagen
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,246
|
The King2006/Marsh This received a 3.5/4 rating in my local paper, so knowing next to nothing about it, I went to an afternoon showing on a whim today. Ah, the joy of summer. This ended up being suprisingly good, with strong performances from Gael GarcĂa Bernal, who I'd never seen before, William Hurt, who I know very little of, Pell James, who effectively played a character a decade younger than her with strong emotional intensity, and Laura Harring, in a stark role reversal from her amnesiac lesbian character in Mulholland Dr., the only other place I'd seen her. Director James Marsh, helming only his 2nd feature film, utilizes a nice dulled color palette to accentuate the dried up, small town feeling of the Texas setting. The film simultaneously explores different character issues while never clearly explaining most of their motivations, which provides for an interesting viewing expierience. The intense moments of violence work well when contrasted with the uber-religious midwestern backdrop, where conflicting morals and values come into play. Overall, a very good film, apparently sorely lacking wide distribution or any sort of marketing. Glad it caught my eye in the paper today. Definitely recommended if you can find anywhere showing it. 4.5/5 Stars Trailer 
I dream in widescreen.
|
|
|
|