2 registered members (m2w, Malavita),
481
guests, and 26
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics43,334
Posts1,085,943
Members10,381
|
Most Online1,100 Jun 10th, 2024
|
|
|
Re: American mafia - Associates?
[Re: MeyerLansky]
#950229
08/15/18 12:32 PM
08/15/18 12:32 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,710
BillyBrizzi
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,710
|
well i guess a mix of politicians, street thugs, wannabes, local businessmens
Politicians, businessmen and corrupt officials are considered more as connections/connected guys, instead of being part of a crew like an enforcer, street thug or wannabe.. That's why the term associate is open to multiple interpretations..
Last edited by BillyBrizzi; 08/15/18 12:36 PM.
FORTIS FORTUNA IUVAT
|
|
|
Re: American mafia - Associates?
[Re: TheKillingJoke]
#950237
08/15/18 01:42 PM
08/15/18 01:42 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 384 Providence, RI
The_Marble_Guy
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 384
Providence, RI
|
Its a loose term for sure. Personally, whenever i hear the term " associate " being used, i think of someone in the rackets, a crew, under someones flag whos not made. When it comes to politicians, cops, judges, businessmen i refer to " so and so with Mob ties/connections ". But that's just my interpretation.
" If you're going to be bad, be good at it "
Jerry Tillinghast
|
|
|
Re: American mafia - Associates?
[Re: The_Marble_Guy]
#950246
08/15/18 02:53 PM
08/15/18 02:53 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,231
TheKillingJoke
OP
Underboss
|
OP
Underboss
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,231
|
Its a loose term for sure. Personally, whenever i hear the term " associate " being used, i think of someone in the rackets, a crew, under someones flag whos not made. When it comes to politicians, cops, judges, businessmen i refer to " so and so with Mob ties/connections ". But that's just my interpretation.
Yeah, personally, that has always been my interpretation as well. I just don't really know how it's interpreted in the estimations.
|
|
|
Re: American mafia - Associates?
[Re: TheKillingJoke]
#950249
08/15/18 03:25 PM
08/15/18 03:25 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 641
NickyfromTampa
BANNED
|
BANNED
Underboss
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 641
|
The official Mafia term for "associate" means somebody is "on record" with a wiseguy, like Donnie Brasco with Lefty, also the media definitely uses it more loosely. I personally believe that when the FBI uses the term associate, they are referring to guys that are "on record," meaning they work for the mob and are under the mob's protection. I don't think this really applies to bikie gangsters or members of other organized crime units, and I've never seen a bikie referred to as a Mafia associate. Also, in today's day and age, local politicians and businessmen would make up a very small percentage of the Mafia associates referred to in FBI figures, simply due to the fact that the Mafia's grip on legitimate industries has really loosened over time. I would say the 750 associates in the Gambino Family are "on record" guys. It wouldn't be an exaggeration to say a soldier could have six guys under him. Some Italian, some not. Some might be proposed for membership, most not. When we see big, bread-and-butter, street-level busts, the number of associates far outranks the number of made guys.
|
|
|
Re: American mafia - Associates?
[Re: NickyfromTampa]
#950274
08/15/18 04:59 PM
08/15/18 04:59 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,231
TheKillingJoke
OP
Underboss
|
OP
Underboss
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,231
|
The official Mafia term for "associate" means somebody is "on record" with a wiseguy, like Donnie Brasco with Lefty, also the media definitely uses it more loosely. I personally believe that when the FBI uses the term associate, they are referring to guys that are "on record," meaning they work for the mob and are under the mob's protection. I don't think this really applies to bikie gangsters or members of other organized crime units, and I've never seen a bikie referred to as a Mafia associate. Also, in today's day and age, local politicians and businessmen would make up a very small percentage of the Mafia associates referred to in FBI figures, simply due to the fact that the Mafia's grip on legitimate industries has really loosened over time. I would say the 750 associates in the Gambino Family are "on record" guys. It wouldn't be an exaggeration to say a soldier could have six guys under him. Some Italian, some not. Some might be proposed for membership, most not. When we see big, bread-and-butter, street-level busts, the number of associates far outranks the number of made guys. Cheers for the response. A criminal that directly works "for" the mob is definitely the most plausible explanation for the term 'associate'. I was just curious to how for instance the FBI applies the moniker. I've read stuff about bikers associating themselves with mobsters - for instance Mark Polchan with Fat Sarno in Chicago - but I wasn't too sure whether they're regarded as direct mob associates that work "for" the mob or as members of other criminal organizations that work "with" the mob.
|
|
|
Re: American mafia - Associates?
[Re: NickyfromTampa]
#950279
08/15/18 05:37 PM
08/15/18 05:37 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 77
OurThing
Button
|
Button
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 77
|
I would say the 750 associates in the Gambino Family are "on record" guys. When they said 750 they included full-fledged members. I guess all ~750 are confirmed suspected of having some involvement in the criminal activities of the family, at the least. As for which ones are and aren’t members, I bet even the FBI doesn’t know at all times. The ones you hear about made some splash in the underworld, and in LE circles. Who can say with a 100% certainty which Italian guy in a lower tier position is and isn’t made? Few people are going to come out and say “I am a member of an organized crime familyâ€. Regardless of what surveillance techniques or informants they have.
|
|
|
Re: American mafia - Associates?
[Re: NickyfromTampa]
#950295
08/15/18 06:12 PM
08/15/18 06:12 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,940
ralphie_cifaretto
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,940
|
The official Mafia term for "associate" means somebody is "on record" with a wiseguy, like Donnie Brasco with Lefty, also the media definitely uses it more loosely. I personally believe that when the FBI uses the term associate, they are referring to guys that are "on record," meaning they work for the mob and are under the mob's protection. I don't think this really applies to bikie gangsters or members of other organized crime units, and I've never seen a bikie referred to as a Mafia associate. Also, in today's day and age, local politicians and businessmen would make up a very small percentage of the Mafia associates referred to in FBI figures, simply due to the fact that the Mafia's grip on legitimate industries has really loosened over time. I would say the 750 associates in the Gambino Family are "on record" guys. It wouldn't be an exaggeration to say a soldier could have six guys under him. Some Italian, some not. Some might be proposed for membership, most not. When we see big, bread-and-butter, street-level busts, the number of associates far outranks the number of made guys. The media doesn't just use the term loosely. Mob guys themselves use the term loosely. To them, an associate is anyone who is "with" the family but without a button. Meaning it could be a politician, a corrupt cop, a local businessman or a street guy who is on the record. You are wrong in believing that the guys who are on the record represent the majority of those associates. In fact, they only represent about 15 to 20% of the total number of associates. Most are indeed businessmen and criminals who are not on the record. It's much harder for them to find a real street guy than it is for them to get somebody who manages a nightclub to come under their umbrella. If you were familiar with the dynamics of NY then this wouldn't even be a question in your mind. By the way, you are on point with everything else you said. I hope me and you can bury the hatchet someday  .
|
|
|
Re: American mafia - Associates?
[Re: ralphie_cifaretto]
#950312
08/15/18 07:33 PM
08/15/18 07:33 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 641
NickyfromTampa
BANNED
|
BANNED
Underboss
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 641
|
The official Mafia term for "associate" means somebody is "on record" with a wiseguy, like Donnie Brasco with Lefty, also the media definitely uses it more loosely. I personally believe that when the FBI uses the term associate, they are referring to guys that are "on record," meaning they work for the mob and are under the mob's protection. I don't think this really applies to bikie gangsters or members of other organized crime units, and I've never seen a bikie referred to as a Mafia associate. Also, in today's day and age, local politicians and businessmen would make up a very small percentage of the Mafia associates referred to in FBI figures, simply due to the fact that the Mafia's grip on legitimate industries has really loosened over time. I would say the 750 associates in the Gambino Family are "on record" guys. It wouldn't be an exaggeration to say a soldier could have six guys under him. Some Italian, some not. Some might be proposed for membership, most not. When we see big, bread-and-butter, street-level busts, the number of associates far outranks the number of made guys. The media doesn't just use the term loosely. Mob guys themselves use the term loosely. To them, an associate is anyone who is "with" the family but without a button. Meaning it could be a politician, a corrupt cop, a local businessman or a street guy who is on the record. You are wrong in believing that the guys who are on the record represent the majority of those associates. In fact, they only represent about 15 to 20% of the total number of associates. Most are indeed businessmen and criminals who are not on the record. It's much harder for them to find a real street guy than it is for them to get somebody who manages a nightclub to come under their umbrella. If you were familiar with the dynamics of NY then this wouldn't even be a question in your mind. By the way, you are on point with everything else you said. I hope me and you can bury the hatchet someday  . Me too, Ralphie, no point making enemies. If the number of "on-record" associates only makes up 15-20% of the associates that the FBI lists, then that would imply there are not very many "on-record" associates. Take the Colombos. The New Jersey State of Organized Crime report in 2004 ( http://mafianj.com/sci2004/colombo.shtml) listed the Colombos at 112 members and around 500 associates. I'd wager that the number of "on-record" associates compared to made members (for the Colombos) is at least 3:1, probably more. The Jan. 2011 bust showed far more associates than made members in or around Big Anthony Russo's crew. In the 2010 bust of John Franzese, Sonny was the only "made guy" indicted - all of his goons and henchmen were associates, presumably "on-record." In the March 2010 bust, Theodore Persico Jr. and Tom Petrizzo were the only two made guys in a list of eight defendants, most of which were fulltime mob henchmen. What my point is, I guess, is that it would not surprise me at all if the 112:500 figure for made members vs. associates in the Colombos represents only "on-record" associates. Remember, most active soldiers have at least a couple of on-record guys under them to do the dirty work.
|
|
|
Re: American mafia - Associates?
[Re: NickyfromTampa]
#950313
08/15/18 08:19 PM
08/15/18 08:19 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,940
ralphie_cifaretto
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,940
|
The official Mafia term for "associate" means somebody is "on record" with a wiseguy, like Donnie Brasco with Lefty, also the media definitely uses it more loosely. I personally believe that when the FBI uses the term associate, they are referring to guys that are "on record," meaning they work for the mob and are under the mob's protection. I don't think this really applies to bikie gangsters or members of other organized crime units, and I've never seen a bikie referred to as a Mafia associate. Also, in today's day and age, local politicians and businessmen would make up a very small percentage of the Mafia associates referred to in FBI figures, simply due to the fact that the Mafia's grip on legitimate industries has really loosened over time. I would say the 750 associates in the Gambino Family are "on record" guys. It wouldn't be an exaggeration to say a soldier could have six guys under him. Some Italian, some not. Some might be proposed for membership, most not. When we see big, bread-and-butter, street-level busts, the number of associates far outranks the number of made guys. The media doesn't just use the term loosely. Mob guys themselves use the term loosely. To them, an associate is anyone who is "with" the family but without a button. Meaning it could be a politician, a corrupt cop, a local businessman or a street guy who is on the record. You are wrong in believing that the guys who are on the record represent the majority of those associates. In fact, they only represent about 15 to 20% of the total number of associates. Most are indeed businessmen and criminals who are not on the record. It's much harder for them to find a real street guy than it is for them to get somebody who manages a nightclub to come under their umbrella. If you were familiar with the dynamics of NY then this wouldn't even be a question in your mind. By the way, you are on point with everything else you said. I hope me and you can bury the hatchet someday  . Me too, Ralphie, no point making enemies. If the number of "on-record" associates only makes up 15-20% of the associates that the FBI lists, then that would imply there are not very many "on-record" associates. Take the Colombos. The New Jersey State of Organized Crime report in 2004 ( http://mafianj.com/sci2004/colombo.shtml) listed the Colombos at 112 members and around 500 associates. I'd wager that the number of "on-record" associates compared to made members (for the Colombos) is at least 3:1, probably more. The Jan. 2011 bust showed far more associates than made members in or around Big Anthony Russo's crew. In the 2010 bust of John Franzese, Sonny was the only "made guy" indicted - all of his goons and henchmen were associates, presumably "on-record." In the March 2010 bust, Theodore Persico Jr. and Tom Petrizzo were the only two made guys in a list of eight defendants, most of which were fulltime mob henchmen. What my point is, I guess, is that it would not surprise me at all if the 112:500 figure for made members vs. associates in the Colombos represents only "on-record" associates. Remember, most active soldiers have at least a couple of on-record guys under them to do the dirty work. I see now where you're coming from. The FBI tends to only label 'on the record' guys as associates, something you accurately stated. Those are the guys we are most interested in learning about, the guys who are on the street and belong to a crew. What I was pointing to are guys who are considered to be 'with' a certain family, but aren't considered 'on the record' street guys. These guys are mostly business people and people who are in legitimate positions doing the mob's bidding. In 2004, the Bonannos had some 2500 people who fit this category. According to Cicale, Basciano came up with around 3000 people he counted as 'associates'. Now they obviously went with the broad definition of the word and they included street guys on the record (a total of around 500).
|
|
|
Re: American mafia - Associates?
[Re: kingoflittlenewyork]
#950324
08/15/18 09:54 PM
08/15/18 09:54 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,822 Where ever needed.
DuesPaid
Banned
|
Banned

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,822
Where ever needed.
|
Early FBI files show how close Luciano and Lepke were, in that the files refer to them as the 'Luciano-Buckhalter Mob.' I don't think early non Italian bosses like Shultz, Lepke, Zwillman could be considered associates, imo. Agree, since induction was not huge in the early stages of American Organizing. However Lanskey & Siegel were in closer to the idea of being only associated since Lucky became a force and corner stone to the more Organized Italian groups.
Be Loyal, Be Loving, Be Quiet.
|
|
|
Re: American mafia - Associates?
[Re: ralphie_cifaretto]
#950331
08/15/18 11:17 PM
08/15/18 11:17 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,441
MeyerLansky
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,441
|
The official Mafia term for "associate" means somebody is "on record" with a wiseguy, like Donnie Brasco with Lefty, also the media definitely uses it more loosely. I personally believe that when the FBI uses the term associate, they are referring to guys that are "on record," meaning they work for the mob and are under the mob's protection. I don't think this really applies to bikie gangsters or members of other organized crime units, and I've never seen a bikie referred to as a Mafia associate. Also, in today's day and age, local politicians and businessmen would make up a very small percentage of the Mafia associates referred to in FBI figures, simply due to the fact that the Mafia's grip on legitimate industries has really loosened over time. I would say the 750 associates in the Gambino Family are "on record" guys. It wouldn't be an exaggeration to say a soldier could have six guys under him. Some Italian, some not. Some might be proposed for membership, most not. When we see big, bread-and-butter, street-level busts, the number of associates far outranks the number of made guys. The media doesn't just use the term loosely. Mob guys themselves use the term loosely. To them, an associate is anyone who is "with" the family but without a button. Meaning it could be a politician, a corrupt cop, a local businessman or a street guy who is on the record. You are wrong in believing that the guys who are on the record represent the majority of those associates. In fact, they only represent about 15 to 20% of the total number of associates. Most are indeed businessmen and criminals who are not on the record. It's much harder for them to find a real street guy than it is for them to get somebody who manages a nightclub to come under their umbrella. If you were familiar with the dynamics of NY then this wouldn't even be a question in your mind. By the way, you are on point with everything else you said. I hope me and you can bury the hatchet someday  . Me too, Ralphie, no point making enemies. If the number of "on-record" associates only makes up 15-20% of the associates that the FBI lists, then that would imply there are not very many "on-record" associates. Take the Colombos. The New Jersey State of Organized Crime report in 2004 ( http://mafianj.com/sci2004/colombo.shtml) listed the Colombos at 112 members and around 500 associates. I'd wager that the number of "on-record" associates compared to made members (for the Colombos) is at least 3:1, probably more. The Jan. 2011 bust showed far more associates than made members in or around Big Anthony Russo's crew. In the 2010 bust of John Franzese, Sonny was the only "made guy" indicted - all of his goons and henchmen were associates, presumably "on-record." In the March 2010 bust, Theodore Persico Jr. and Tom Petrizzo were the only two made guys in a list of eight defendants, most of which were fulltime mob henchmen. What my point is, I guess, is that it would not surprise me at all if the 112:500 figure for made members vs. associates in the Colombos represents only "on-record" associates. Remember, most active soldiers have at least a couple of on-record guys under them to do the dirty work. I see now where you're coming from. The FBI tends to only label 'on the record' guys as associates, something you accurately stated. Those are the guys we are most interested in learning about, the guys who are on the street and belong to a crew. What I was pointing to are guys who are considered to be 'with' a certain family, but aren't considered 'on the record' street guys. These guys are mostly business people and people who are in legitimate positions doing the mob's bidding. In 2004, the Bonannos had some 2500 people who fit this category. According to Cicale, Basciano came up with around 3000 people he counted as 'associates'. Now they obviously went with the broad definition of the word and they included street guys on the record (a total of around 500). The bonannos have 500 associates ?
|
|
|
Re: American mafia - Associates?
[Re: MeyerLansky]
#950382
08/16/18 12:26 PM
08/16/18 12:26 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,940
ralphie_cifaretto
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,940
|
The bonannos have 500 associates ? They have anywhere between 300 and 500 guys who are 'on the record'. The feds tend to inflate these numbers. A good guess would be around 400. Nicky mentioned 750 guys on record with the Gambinos and he's probably not too far off. As stated earlier, the vast majority of those guys never get made. so from all of those 400 maybe only 180 - 200 are italian right ? Very hard to say, especially in this day and age. The Staten Island crews and some of the Jersey crews are almost all 90% Italian. You start seeing more diversity in Queens and the Bronx. There are certainly crews in those areas where the Italians are a minority. The life has changed a lot over the years.
|
|
|
Re: American mafia - Associates?
[Re: ralphie_cifaretto]
#950386
08/16/18 01:35 PM
08/16/18 01:35 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,441
MeyerLansky
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,441
|
The bonannos have 500 associates ? They have anywhere between 300 and 500 guys who are 'on the record'. The feds tend to inflate these numbers. A good guess would be around 400. Nicky mentioned 750 guys on record with the Gambinos and he's probably not too far off. As stated earlier, the vast majority of those guys never get made. so from all of those 400 maybe only 180 - 200 are italian right ? Very hard to say, especially in this day and age. The Staten Island crews and some of the Jersey crews are almost all 90% Italian. You start seeing more diversity in Queens and the Bronx. There are certainly crews in those areas where the Italians are a minority. The life has changed a lot over the years. So if that's true then the all mob (not only the bonanno's) are really making a come back since they lose their power in the late 80s/early 90s Like i've been saying for a long time !
|
|
|
Re: American mafia - Associates?
[Re: TheKillingJoke]
#950408
08/16/18 05:10 PM
08/16/18 05:10 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 77
OurThing
Button
|
Button
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 77
|
This is one of the ones I was thinking about. The bottom row of this chart illustrates the diversity of mob associates.
|
|
|
Re: American mafia - Associates?
[Re: TheKillingJoke]
#950418
08/16/18 05:32 PM
08/16/18 05:32 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 641
NickyfromTampa
BANNED
|
BANNED
Underboss
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 641
|
Very hard to say, especially in this day and age. The Staten Island crews and some of the Jersey crews are almost all 90% Italian. You start seeing more diversity in Queens and the Bronx. There are certainly crews in those areas where the Italians are a minority. The life has changed a lot over the years.
So if that's true then the all mob (not only the bonanno's) are really making a come back since they lose their power in the late 80s/early 90s Like i've been saying for a long time ! [/quote] It's no secret the mob has been recovering, Meyer. The FBI now only has two New York crews fighting the Five Families. The Jan. 2011 "Mafia Takedown Day" was almost a grand finale for the feds because a few months after that was when they first dismantled the separate crews for each of the Five Families and merged the Colombos with the Bonannos once more, as well as reducing the amount of agents across the board to only 45. Two years later, that number plummeted to 25 and the Genovese squad was merged with the Bonanno/Colombo squad and the Gambino squad was merged with the Luccheses. Here's a New York Post article about the situation: https://nypost.com/2013/06/20/feds-only-have-2-squads-left-to-combat-city-mafia-families/
|
|
|
|