Seems you and I are the only ones following this trial. It is really hard (impossible) to judge, not being in the courtroom. We can only go by what commentators/lawyers say. I mostly hear lawyers (both defense & prosecution) analyze what was testified to. It seems, at least on the surface, that the prosecutors case is weak, and all the witnesses with excess baggage and reasons to lie. However, stepping aside from that aspect, I think too, that these recent boys who testified they were never molested/fondled by Jackson, also have reason to lie. I sure wouldn't want to tell the world, if I were in that situation. Bottom line I think it is going to come down to who's believeable and who is not. My prediction is still a "not guilty" or maybe a lesser charge.
TIS
"Mankind must put an end to war before war puts an end to mankind. War will exist until that distant day when the conscientious objector enjoys the same reputation and prestige that the warrior does today." JFK
I mostly hear lawyers (both defense & prosecution) analyze what was testified to. It seems, at least on the surface, that the prosecutors case is weak, and all the witnesses with excess baggage and reasons to lie. However, stepping aside from that aspect, I think too, that these recent boys who testified they were never molested/fondled by Jackson, also have reason to lie. I sure wouldn't want to tell the world, if I were in that situation. Bottom line I think it is going to come down to who's believeable and who is not. My prediction is still a "not guilty" or maybe a lesser charge.
