2 registered members (dixiemafia, 1 invisible),
90
guests, and 18
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics42,988
Posts1,074,944
Members10,349
|
Most Online1,100 Jun 10th, 2024
|
|
|
Re: Michael & Roth's casinos
[Re: olivant]
#987279
03/03/20 10:27 PM
03/03/20 10:27 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635 AZ
Turnbull
OP
|
OP
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635
AZ
|
I don't think Michael was acting recklessly in Cuba. He operated with the confidence and assurance that he knew Roth was behind the Tahoe shooting, and that Roth wanted him in Cuba so he could be killed. He also was confident that Roth still thought Michael believed that Pentangeli was behind the shooting and that their relationship was still good. A classic example of the Corleones' craft of making your enemies relax and get careless by thinking you're weak or stupid.
Michael, like every American who read newspapers in '58, knew Batista was governing on borrowed time. He couldn't have known when Batista would resign. But, I think he was being ultra-careful by going, very visibly, to the Presidential party while Bussetta was attempting to kill Roth. He ordered the plane so he could get out of Cuba fast, before the authorities could start rounding up suspects in Roth's death. Even though Bussetta tried to smother Roth so it might look like a natural death, Batista and whoever else was in on the plot against Michael would have linked him to Roth's death--and in a dictatorship, they don't need warrants and court orders to round up suspects.
Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu, E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu... E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
|
|
|
Re: Michael & Roth's casinos
[Re: Turnbull]
#987288
03/04/20 12:58 AM
03/04/20 12:58 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
My take, for what it is worth! - from what we saw in the movie
Batista too â€seems to be in the dark about how well the rebels are doing†Batista gave assurance that according to his staff the rebels will be driven out of the city before the New Year!
Sure thing Woltz Michael arranged the below which just one phone call to the Hotel Concierge and voila! everything in place 1. his own driver to take him to the airport 2. plane and a pilot
Michael also knew a place Fredo and Michael can spend some time together
Nobody could have predicted Batista's resignation that night, New Year's Eve which resulted in the “country crumbling around themâ€
So, I don't think it is about Michael “trusted the pilot enough to stand fast†irrespective.... I believe, the pilot would have been just a regular commercial pilot, may not even know who his passenger/s are [arranged by the Hotel Concierge] and perhaps blissfully unaware of all the rebel uprising chaos, standing by at the Airport As regards “Michael seems to know Roth's exact plan†for Michael's New Year's Eve assassination If my memory serves me right - Turnbull had a credible theory that Michael would have twigged straight away as to why Michael needed to be escorted in a military car for his protection [when according to Roth “This county's had rebels for the last fifty years It's in their blood†and it is business as usual] Whilst Michael would among others “staking his life" seems implausible to me as well but seemingly that's what Michael did!
I don't think Michael thought “killing Roth will end the [Michael's assassination] threat†nor Batista was even a consideration for Michael because I believe Michael would not want Roth or Ola's bodies found until Michael was out of Cuba not because I believe Michael could be linked to the deaths but to avoid the hassle, delay and Michael having to play the grieving son!
I am not sure Turnbull "Michael also was confident that Roth still thought Michael believed that Pentangeli was behind the shooting and that their relationship was still good"
I believe the charade was finally exposed with Michael's “Who had Frank Pentangeli killed?†Roth's soliloquy and Ola looking smug that Michael has no idea Pentangeli is alive, Michael is no match for Roth
|
|
|
Re: Michael & Roth's casinos
[Re: Capri]
#987289
03/04/20 12:58 AM
03/04/20 12:58 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
It is not like Mafia haven't kill civilian women and children Could have been anyone behind the shooting
No point finding out the traitor then Michael dead
How linking to Roth's murder? Bodyguard would have smothered by a pillow it could seem a natural death caused by the same heart attack he's been dying for twenty years Mafia's code of behaviour is a convenient myth! among others, 1. Don Ciccio would have killed Vito if the orphaned Vito had been found 2. Hooker with Tattaglia 3. Geary compromise Hooker 4. Spraying machine gun fire into bedrooms with women and children would not be out of the question! either
|
|
|
Re: Michael & Roth's casinos
[Re: The Last Woltz]
#987293
03/04/20 05:26 AM
03/04/20 05:26 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 449
Capri
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 449
|
This is an interesting thread.
Regarding Michael's "recklessness" in Cuba, and whether Bautista's resignation saved his life, I think we might be selling Michael a little short.
Michael seems to know Roth's exact plan but is still confident that killing Roth will end the threat. Why?
Is it realistic that Michael assumed that word of Roth's death would get to Bautista almost immediately, and that Bautista would not only not want revenge, but would go out of his way - during the party - to urgently get a hold of the assassins and call Michael's killing off? Why would Bautista make that a priority? It hardly seems like Michael to put his life on the line based on such a flimsy turn of events.
My theory is that Michael had an entirely separate plan to assure his escape, regardless of whether Roth and Ola were killed. Maybe he bribed a legion of soldiers to protect him. Maybe he bribed Bautista himself to double-cross Roth. (BTW, Roth seems to be in the dark about how well the rebels are doing, which calls into question how close he and Bautista really were.) We never see what it was, so it's hard to speculate. But that makes much more sense that him staking his life on such a flimsy chain of events.
A lot of the posts here are based on the fact that Michael was alone in Cuba, except for Bussetta. But that is clearly false. He's arranged his own driver to take him to the airport. He's arranged a plane and a pilot who he trusted enough to stand fast even as the country crumbled around them. If Michael could arrange all that, he surely could have arranged a counter-move to the assassination plan.
Bautista's resignation didn't save Michael's life, it just meant he didn't have to activate his plot. So what we saw in the movie the fact that Michael was alone in Cuba, except for Bussetta is clearly false
|
|
|
Re: Michael & Roth's casinos
[Re: Capri]
#987307
03/04/20 10:52 AM
03/04/20 10:52 AM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 773 Pittsburgh, PA
The Last Woltz
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 773
Pittsburgh, PA
|
So what we saw in the movie the fact that Michael was alone in Cuba, except for Bussetta is clearly false Right. I'm speculating. Just because you don't see anyone in the movie but Bussetta doesn't mean he was Michael's only support. Most of what we talk about here goes beyond what's on the screen. But we do know that Michael had a driver, a plane and a pilot. He correctly believed that his plane was "the only way out of here tonight." His life depended on getting out of Cuba ASAP, plus he remained confident that they would work for him even with Bautista's men trying to kill him and, as it turned out, even with the government being overthrown. I don't believe that he would have had that trust in people he randomly found at the concierge desk at the hotel. Those were guys he trusted, not hired hands. True, my theory that Michael had plan to get away even if Bautista hadn't abdicated is more speculative. But it is rooted in the nature of the characters we see on the screen. Michael was cunning, cautious and stragetic. It would be hugely out of character that he would have "twigged" to Roth's plan and then walked right into it without so much as a single bodyguard. OK, he had arranged a separate car, but that would only have helped him if he made it to the car in the first place (and if the driver was prepared to out-gun Michael's military escort). Did Michael expect a team of assassins have let him simply decline their offer of a ride and go about his way? Surely, Roth would have made sure they would have kept a close eye on Michael. Could Michael have failed to realize that? I don't think so, which is why I believe that Michael had an off-screen escape plan.
"A man in my position cannot afford to be made to look ridiculous!"
|
|
|
Re: Michael & Roth's casinos
[Re: The Last Woltz]
#987331
03/04/20 11:13 PM
03/04/20 11:13 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 818
Trojan
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 818
|
My two cents worth!
Michael and Roth sentiments aside....
What would have happened if Batista had not resigned? No doubt I reckon the assassins assigned to kill Michael would have carried out their assignment and murdered him
We all know Coppola's fanatical attention to details that he would leave out and not even give an indication of Michael's counter-move if any, to the assassination plan which he didn't have to activate his plot due to Bautista's resignation is not in accordance
As Turnbull posted the assassins would have been shadowing him, keeping a close eye but once Batista resigned they were more worried about saving their own asses than about nailing Michael's So Batista's resignation probably saved Michael's life.
How would Michael find trusted driver and pilot in foreign Havana? I reckon they were run-of-the-mill hired hands At that stage, Batista governing and nothing out of the ordinary someone hiring a private plane out of Havana after the New Year celebrations
Michael was cunning, cautious and stragetic but he did slip up with Roth in the beginning and as Turnbull posted was obsessed with finding the traitor
Exactly Woltz It would be hugely out of character as discussed uncharacteristic and implausible he was hanging around without so much as a single bodyguard.
Why he was being ultra-careful by going, very visibly, to the Presidential party? Everyone knows he is not going to personally murder!
Most of what we talk about here might go beyond what's on the screen but in conjunction with what was seen in the movie as well It is nice, fun to flesh out the different opinions, interpretations, speculations, knowledge of the Forum members, in the spirit of the Board Why we are still going!
|
|
|
Re: Michael & Roth's casinos
[Re: Trojan]
#987333
03/05/20 12:59 AM
03/05/20 12:59 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635 AZ
Turnbull
OP
|
OP
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635
AZ
|
How would Michael find trusted driver and pilot in foreign Havana? I reckon they were run-of-the-mill hired hands
I''m guessing that he had Tom arrange the driver and the plane. I'm reasonably sure he was in constant touch with Tom. It would be hugely out of character as discussed uncharacteristic and implausible he was hanging around without so much as a single bodyguard. I think that coming with only a personal bodyguard was part of his plan to make Roth "relax" by thinking Michael felt reasonably safe in Roth's territory and didn't suspect that Roth was going to have him killed. Then why bring a bodyguard at all, you may ask. Because not bringing any personal security would make Michael look uncharacteristically stupid by not being at all concerned with personal safety. And, by not bringing Neri and/or Rocco, he was signaling Roth that he hadn't ruled them out as possible conspirators in the Tahoe shooting. Why he was being ultra-careful by going, very visibly, to the Presidential party? Everyone knows he is not going to personally murder! ' Yes, he was being ultra-careful to distance himself from Buscetta's deed and to create an alibi for Roth's killing, "just in case." It is nice, fun to flesh out the different opinions, interpretations, speculations, knowledge of the Forum members, in the spirit of the Board Why we are still going! That's it in a nutshell!
Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu, E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu... E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
|
|
|
Re: Michael & Roth's casinos
[Re: The Last Woltz]
#987334
03/05/20 05:19 AM
03/05/20 05:19 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 449
Capri
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 449
|
So what we saw in the movie the fact that Michael was alone in Cuba, except for Bussetta is clearly false Right. I'm speculating. Just because you don't see anyone in the movie but Bussetta doesn't mean he was Michael's only support. Most of what we talk about here goes beyond what's on the screen. But we do know that Michael had a driver, a plane and a pilot. He correctly believed that his plane was "the only way out of here tonight." His life depended on getting out of Cuba ASAP, plus he remained confident that they would work for him even with Bautista's men trying to kill him and, as it turned out, even with the government being overthrown. I don't believe that he would have had that trust in people he randomly found at the concierge desk at the hotel. Those were guys he trusted, not hired hands. True, my theory that Michael had plan to get away even if Bautista hadn't abdicated is more speculative. But it is rooted in the nature of the characters we see on the screen. Michael was cunning, cautious and stragetic. It would be hugely out of character that he would have "twigged" to Roth's plan and then walked right into it without so much as a single bodyguard. OK, he had arranged a separate car, but that would only have helped him if he made it to the car in the first place (and if the driver was prepared to out-gun Michael's military escort). Did Michael expect a team of assassins have let him simply decline their offer of a ride and go about his way? Surely, Roth would have made sure they would have kept a close eye on Michael. Could Michael have failed to realize that? I don't think so, which is why I believe that Michael had an off-screen escape plan. Just because you don't see anyone in the movie but Bussetta doesn't mean he was Michael's only support or means just that How can he have guys he trusted, in foreign Havana? his plane was "the only way out of here tonight he still has to get to the airport Michael's plans worked because the government being overthrown No Batista resignation ride in the team of assassins car like Tessio Driver, separate car, private plane, pilot no use If he had an off-screen escape plan, what would it have been?
|
|
|
Re: Michael & Roth's casinos
[Re: Turnbull]
#987368
03/05/20 08:56 PM
03/05/20 08:56 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 818
Trojan
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 818
|
How would Michael find trusted driver and pilot in foreign Havana? I reckon they were run-of-the-mill hired hands
I''m guessing that he had Tom arrange the driver and the plane. I'm reasonably sure he was in constant touch with Tom. It would be hugely out of character as discussed uncharacteristic and implausible he was hanging around without so much as a single bodyguard. I think that coming with only a personal bodyguard was part of his plan to make Roth "relax" by thinking Michael felt reasonably safe in Roth's territory and didn't suspect that Roth was going to have him killed. Then why bring a bodyguard at all, you may ask. Because not bringing any personal security would make Michael look uncharacteristically stupid by not being at all concerned with personal safety. And, by not bringing Neri and/or Rocco, he was signaling Roth that he hadn't ruled them out as possible conspirators in the Tahoe shooting. Why he was being ultra-careful by going, very visibly, to the Presidential party? Everyone knows he is not going to personally murder! ' Yes, he was being ultra-careful to distance himself from Buscetta's deed and to create an alibi for Roth's killing, "just in case." It is nice, fun to flesh out the different opinions, interpretations, speculations, knowledge of the Forum members, in the spirit of the Board Why we are still going! That's it in a nutshell! Michael might have been in constant touch with Tom but I can't see Tom arranging the driver and plane from Tahoe Why? He would know even less about Havana than Michael who was actually in Havana As Lana posted, the hotel concierge arranging them makes more sense and I also reckon they were regular hired hands Keep up! Turnbull I don't think any of us are disputing Michael's plan coming with only a personal bodyguard It is the going we are thrashing out, Michael hanging around attending the Presidential party without so much as a single bodyguard and knowing he is a dead man once the party is over Creating an alibi? Whom did he have to answer to? The only issue I see is Bussetta being caught in the act which would no doubt link Michael to Roth's killing If he was not out of Cuba fast no doubt he would have a lot of explaining to do but money talks especially that $2 million Again as you posted Batista's resignation probably saved Michael's life but why take this uncharacteristic and unnecessary risk? Hot off the press!! Bussetta was caught in the act and killed Roth survived Michael escaped
|
|
|
Re: Michael & Roth's casinos
[Re: Turnbull]
#987458
03/08/20 10:26 AM
03/08/20 10:26 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,471 No. Virginia
mustachepete
Special
|
Special
Underboss
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,471
No. Virginia
|
There can be a tendency to impute omniscience to these characters in their cat-and-mouse games. Havana was a big city, a tourist city, a party city. People had been shuttling to Miami by air for probably forty years. I don't think anyone could keep track of every plane amongst so much traffic.
Last edited by mustachepete; 03/08/20 01:33 PM.
"All of these men were good listeners; patient men."
|
|
|
Re: Michael & Roth's casinos
[Re: Turnbull]
#987650
03/14/20 02:45 AM
03/14/20 02:45 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635 AZ
Turnbull
OP
|
OP
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635
AZ
|
[*]*]The assassins after “Batista resigned were more worried about saving their own asses than about nailing Michael's†So under the same circumstances, why would the Military Police worry about Roth? [*][/list]
Historically, Batista's assassinations and other dirty deeds were done not by the military but by his Bureau for the Repression of Communist Activities (BRAC), which was funded by the CIA. They were, technically, civilians. I'm guessing that they were depicted in Roth's hotel room, just after Buscetta strangled Johnny Ola--"Relax, Senor. Roth, we are taking you to the hospital." That scene was before Batista announced his resignation, so they were still "on the job," not covering their asses. The uniformed military people who barged into Roth's hospital room and killed Buscetta were portrayed that way by FFC, I think, for effect: to demonstrate that Roth had clout with the Cuban government--in other words, "directoral license." This was a rare example of where FFC's fanatical attention to detail slipped up: The officer who killed Buscetta used a revolver; but since the US armed Batista's forces, his standard sidearm (handgun) would have been an auto loader--a Colt Model 1911, same sidearm used by US military at that time.
Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu, E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu... E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
|
|
|
Re: Michael & Roth's casinos
[Re: Kangaroo Don]
#987687
03/15/20 01:59 AM
03/15/20 01:59 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635 AZ
Turnbull
OP
|
OP
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635
AZ
|
Why would “Batista's buttons! (BRAC) be depicted in Roth's hotel room before Batista announced his resignation†when it was business as usual and all their plans arranged by Roth including Michael's murder, were in place
?? I'll guess that Batista had his "old friend from Florida, Senor Hyman Roth," watched constantly by BRAC, and maybe the military, to protect him since Roth was paying him for the hit on Michael. Perhaps the Dr. who examined Roth was connected to the government and told BRAC that Roth was in a bad way. That might explain why those plainclothes guys were moving him to the hospital, and why that military detachment charged into his hospital room, probably after Johnny Ola's murdered body was discovered.
Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu, E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu... E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
|
|
|
Re: Michael & Roth's casinos
[Re: Trojan]
#987782
03/17/20 11:01 PM
03/17/20 11:01 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635 AZ
Turnbull
OP
|
OP
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,635
AZ
|
Roth's wife could have arranged the private boat through the hotel concierge if it was still functioning or Batista's people if they have not deserted them after his resignation
How did Fredo get out? How could anyone find him in all that chaos I discussed those points in this thread: http://www.gangsterbb.net/threads/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=472494&Searchpage=1&Main=16944&Words=%2BFredoRoth+%2Bconspiracy&Search=true#Post472494 What was Rocco doing at the Desert Inn? Why did Michael stop over there Tom and Neri were there too A guess is: directorial considerations. Logically, Michael would have met all three at his home in Tahoe. But, FFC was planning to make Michael's return to Tahoe into that deeply melancholy scene we saw (his gift to Anthony of the little car abandoned in snow, Kay working at her sewing machine without looking up when he came in, asking Mama if he could lose his family), so FFC "took care of business" by having him meet the Big Three in Vegas before returning home.
Last edited by Turnbull; 03/17/20 11:01 PM.
Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu, E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu... E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.
|
|
|
Re: Michael & Roth's casinos
[Re: Turnbull]
#987902
03/19/20 11:04 PM
03/19/20 11:04 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082 Australia
Kangaroo Don
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,082
Australia
|
Roth's plan would have been to stay on in Havana after Michael's assassination So there would have been no private boat already waiting like Michael's private plane because Roth never thought “the rebels could win†I doubt Fredo was even a consideration even if Fredo and Roth's alliance was known, “their priority sick Roth and getting out" of Havana Michael's return from sunny Havana to snowy Tahoe, no wife no children greeting him was a telling scene However.... - Kids do get tired of their toys so the little car [Michael's Christmas 'gift'!] was perhaps not quite abandoned It was perhaps too big to drive around indoors so left out for Anthony to play later
- Kay knew Michael was back [in Vegas] but may not have known Michael was actually home in Tahoe, not heard him with the whirring of the sewing machine
Whilst I acknowledge the drama factor including “Was it a boy?†what was awkward for me, was Tom telling Michael such a personal, distressing, private matter of Kay having had a 'miscarriage' and losing the baby Anyhow the sequence of events certainly put us in a melancholy mood! that - - Tom was telling Michael, the husband, Kay, his wife has had a 'miscarriage' instead of Kay telling Michael, herself
- Michael's first question to Tom at the Desert Inn was “Kay know I am back?†but then Michael doesn't even greet Kay when Michael sees Kay at home in Tahoe knowing Kay has had a 'miscarriage'
- Michael instead of comforting and talking to his wife, Kay [not dissimilar to Michael's talk! at Hotel Washington] who has just had a 'miscarriage' walks through heavy snow “to ask Mama if he could lose his familyâ€
- If Michael had talked to Kay instead of Mama or both Kay and Mama, perhaps their marriage might, just might...could have stood a chance of being saved
“The Big Three in Vegas†- Who was minding Michael's wife and his children, the future of the family, at Tahoe No wonder Kay was able to have the abortion!
|
|
|
|